Stock vs Stock Comparison

International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. vs Linde plc

LIN wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3.

IFF$73.24
LIN$495.91

🏆 Tale of the Tape

36
IFFLIN
-3.3%Profitability (Net Margin)20.3%
23.5xValuation (P/E)33.0x
-0.7%Efficiency (ROIC)10.3%
6/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
1.3Safety (Altman Z)4.0
-5.2%Growth (Rev YoY)3.0%
-0.03Risk (Sharpe 1Y)0.66
0.80xBalance Sheet (D/E)1.18x
1.12%FCF Yield2.05%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.358
252-Day Correlation
0.304
126-Day Correlation

Moderately correlated — some diversification benefit from holding both.

Fundamentals

MetricIFFLIN
Market Cap$19.4B$230.1B
P/E Ratio23.5x33.0x
Forward P/E15.8x25.3x
P/B1.37x5.97x
Dividend Yield2.10%1.29%
Beta0.940.74

Quantitative Metrics

MetricIFFLIN
DCF Fair Value$96.04
DCF Upside-81.1%
Piotroski F6/95/9
Altman Z1.273.96
Beneish M-2.47-2.62
FCF Yield1.12%2.05%
Net Debt/EBITDA5.3x1.2x
ROIC-0.7%10.3%
WACC9.7%9.3%
ROIC – WACC-10.4pp1.1pp
Gross Margin36.2%48.8%
Net Margin-3.3%20.3%
Rev Growth YoY-5.2%3.0%
Sharpe (1Y)-0.030.66
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio161%55%

IFF Price

Loading chart...

LIN Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

IFF found in:

XLB2.42%
VAW1.15%
VOE0.30%
RSP0.21%
VO0.17%
VFVA0.13%
ONEV0.13%
SCHV0.07%
VYM0.07%
VTV0.07%
SPYV0.07%
IWD0.06%
VONV0.05%
ESGV0.04%
ONEO0.04%
SCHX0.03%
SCHB0.03%
SPY0.03%
VONE0.03%
VOO0.03%
IVV0.03%
SPTM0.03%
SPLG0.03%
ITOT0.03%
URTH0.03%
QUS0.02%
VTI0.02%
ACWI0.02%

LIN found in:

IYM19.89%
VAW14.98%
XLB14.97%
MGV1.15%
VIG1.05%
VYM0.98%
VTV0.90%
SPYV0.83%
QUS0.76%
VONV0.72%
SDY0.57%
ESGV0.47%
VOO0.38%
SPY0.38%
VONE0.36%
SPTM0.35%
SPLG0.34%
VTI0.33%
VT0.21%
ONEO0.07%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

IFF vs LIN: Head-to-Head Analysis

International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF) and Linde plc (LIN) represent two companies in the Basic Materials sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, LIN leads 6–3 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, IFF generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of -0.7% compared to LIN's 10.3%. This suggests LIN is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between IFF and LIN is 0.358, indicating moderate co-movement, with some diversification value from holding both in a portfolio context.

IFF appears in 28 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while LIN appears in 20 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, IFF or LIN?

Our quantitative analysis compares IFF and LIN across nine fundamental dimensions. LIN wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are IFF and LIN correlated?

The 252-day correlation between IFF and LIN is 0.358. They show moderate correlation — partially diversifying.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.