Stock vs Stock Comparison

Linde plc vs Alcoa Corporation

AA wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4.

LIN$495.91
AA$83.79

🏆 Tale of the Tape

45
LINAA
20.3%Profitability (Net Margin)9.0%
33.0xValuation (P/E)19.9x
10.3%Efficiency (ROIC)7.8%
5/9Health (Piotroski F)6/9
4.0Safety (Altman Z)2.3
3.0%Growth (Rev YoY)7.9%
0.66Risk (Sharpe 1Y)2.18
1.18xBalance Sheet (D/E)1.60x
2.05%FCF Yield2.82%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.184
252-Day Correlation
0.095
126-Day Correlation

Low correlation — excellent diversification pair.

Fundamentals

MetricLINAA
Market Cap$230.1B$20.5B
P/E Ratio33.0x19.9x
Forward P/E25.3x11.5x
P/B5.97x3.00x
Dividend Yield1.29%0.52%
Beta0.741.51

Quantitative Metrics

MetricLINAA
DCF Fair Value$96.04$43.49
DCF Upside-81.1%-40.7%
Piotroski F5/96/9
Altman Z3.962.31
Beneish M-2.62-2.39
FCF Yield2.05%2.82%
Net Debt/EBITDA1.2x0.5x
ROIC10.3%7.8%
WACC9.3%13.9%
ROIC – WACC1.1pp-6.1pp
Gross Margin48.8%16.9%
Net Margin20.3%9.0%
Rev Growth YoY3.0%7.9%
Sharpe (1Y)0.662.18
Max Drawdown 3Y-52.3%
FCF Payout Ratio55%19%

LIN Price

Loading chart...

AA Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

LIN found in:

IYM19.89%
VAW14.98%
XLB14.97%
MGV1.15%
VIG1.05%
VYM0.98%
VTV0.90%
SPYV0.83%
QUS0.76%
VONV0.72%
SDY0.57%
ESGV0.47%
VOO0.38%
SPY0.38%
VONE0.36%
SPTM0.35%
SPLG0.34%
VTI0.33%
VT0.21%
ONEO0.07%

AA found in:

XME4.27%
MDYV1.03%
IJJ0.98%
VAW0.79%
SPMD0.50%
MDY0.50%
ONEY0.48%
VBR0.38%
VB0.22%
VXF0.20%
ONEO0.14%
VFMO0.10%
VONV0.05%
VONE0.03%
VTI0.02%
SPTM0.02%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

LIN vs AA: Head-to-Head Analysis

Linde plc (LIN) and Alcoa Corporation (AA) represent two companies in the Basic Materials sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, AA leads 5–4 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, LIN generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 10.3% compared to AA's 7.8%. This suggests LIN is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between LIN and AA is 0.184, indicating low correlation, making them an effective diversification pair in a portfolio context.

LIN appears in 20 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while AA appears in 16 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, LIN or AA?

Our quantitative analysis compares LIN and AA across nine fundamental dimensions. AA wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are LIN and AA correlated?

The 252-day correlation between LIN and AA is 0.184. They have low correlation, offering good diversification.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.