SCHV(SCHV)
AI Look-Through Summary
AI GeneratedThe SCHV ETF maintains a substantial asset base of $14.8 billion, reflecting significant investor participation in its underlying strategy. The portfolio's composition is anchored by heavy allocations to Financial Services and Technology sectors, which collectively account for over 26% of total weightings. This sector tilt suggests the fund seeks exposure to large-cap equities that often drive market breadth while maintaining a presence across industrials, healthcare, and consumer staples. Within these core areas, specific names like JPMorgan Chase in financials and Microsoft in technology represent notable individual concentrations, each holding approximately 2% to nearly 3% of the total portfolio value.
Geographically, the fund's structure implies a primary focus on developed markets given its heavy reliance on major multinational corporations listed primarily in the United States. The top ten holdings include global giants such as Berkshire Hathaway, ExxonMobil, and Johnson & Johnson, indicating that the asset allocation is heavily skewed toward established industry leaders rather than emerging market opportunities or small-cap growth stocks. While the inclusion of companies like Home Depot and Procter & Gamble provides some defensive characteristics through consumer exposure, the overall weightings in cyclical sectors like industrials and energy suggest a balance between stability and sensitivity to macroeconomic cycles.
Quantitatively, the presence of Berkshire Hathaway as the largest single holding at 3.1% introduces a unique concentration risk relative to typical broad-market indices where no single entity usually exceeds such thresholds unless specifically weighted by market cap or index methodology. The dispersion across ten distinct sectors demonstrates an attempt to mitigate idiosyncratic sector risks, yet the sheer size of the fund combined with its top-heavy holdings in specific mega-cap firms means that performance will be tightly correlated with the fortunes of these largest constituents. Ultimately, the structure points toward a vehicle designed for investors seeking broad large-cap exposure while accepting higher sensitivity to movements within financial services and technology sectors compared to more diversified global or small-cap alternatives.
Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-22 01:15:21.368721+00
🔍 Theme Alignment Audit
AI GeneratedPurity: 45/100The investment theme implied by the ticker SCHV, which typically denotes a low-volatility strategy rather than a specific sector focus, is broadly reflected in the holdings list dominated by established giants across diverse industries. While the fund maintains exposure to financial services, technology, and healthcare as expected for a broad diversification approach, the presence of mega-cap stocks like Berkshire Hathaway alongside consumer defensive leaders suggests an emphasis on stability through large market capitalization rather than adherence to a narrow thematic niche. The top holdings span multiple sectors including energy and industrials without clustering around a single industry group, indicating that the fund's primary objective appears to be risk mitigation via broad diversification among high-quality companies rather than targeting a specific economic theme like green energy or artificial intelligence.
Sector weights reveal a coherent distribution where financial services and technology constitute significant portions of the portfolio, aligning with historical characteristics of low-volatility strategies that favor established market leaders over emerging sectors. The concentration risk remains moderate given that the top ten holdings account for only 18.7% of assets, while sector allocations show no extreme skewness toward a single industry, suggesting the fund is not heavily reliant on one economic driver. This structure differentiates the vehicle from broad-market indices by likely tilting toward companies with lower beta profiles within their respective sectors, yet it lacks distinctiveness compared to standard large-cap value or minimum volatility benchmarks due to its wide sector coverage and reliance on well-known blue-chip names that overlap significantly with general market constituents.
AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-22 01:20:58.414424+00
🏢 Sector Analysis
AI GeneratedThe sector allocation of SCHV presents a distinct divergence from the broad market, characterized by an intentional underweighting in growth-oriented and cyclical categories relative to traditional value sectors. Financial Services stands out as the largest single component at 14.2%, followed closely by Technology and Industrials, suggesting a primary investment thesis anchored in established businesses with proven track records rather than high-growth potential or speculative ventures. This weighting pattern indicates a deliberate avoidance of Communication Services and Basic Materials, which together comprise less than half a percent of the portfolio, signaling that the fund seeks stability over exposure to rapidly evolving media landscapes or commodity-dependent industries. The presence of significant holdings in Energy and Consumer Defensive sectors further reinforces a strategy focused on companies with resilient cash flows and lower sensitivity to economic downturns compared to their cyclical counterparts.
Concentration risk within this structure is mitigated by a diversified top-ten holding profile that accounts for only 18.7% of total assets, yet the sheer number of positions in key sectors like Financial Services (48 holdings) suggests broad exposure rather than reliance on single-stock idiosyncrasies. The inclusion of Berkshire Hathaway alongside major players from Finance, Energy, Healthcare, and Consumer Staples highlights a tilt toward large-cap value factors, prioritizing companies with strong balance sheets and consistent dividend histories over those driven by momentum or small-cap growth metrics. While the portfolio maintains exposure to Technology at 12.2%, it lacks the aggressive overweighting seen in pure-play tech funds, instead balancing this sector with heavy industrial and healthcare components. This configuration implies a risk management approach that seeks to preserve capital during volatile market conditions while capturing returns from sectors historically associated with lower volatility and higher dividend yields, effectively positioning the fund as a defensive value instrument rather than an engine for rapid appreciation.
AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-22 18:03:43.186279+00
Flow Driver Analysis
2-Step CircleWhich larger ETFs share SCHV's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?
Approximately 100% of SCHV's weight flows through these larger ETFs
| Driver ETF | AUM | Expense | Shared Stocks | Weight Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHBSchwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | $37B | — | 555 | 99.8% |
| SCHXSCHX | $61B | — | 555 | 99.8% |
| ITOTiShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | $80B | — | 552 | 99.8% |
| URTHiShares MSCI World ETF | $7B | — | 385 | 94.0% |
| ACWIiShares MSCI ACWI ETF | $28B | — | 385 | 94.0% |
100% of SCHV's portfolio by weight is also held by SCHB, which commands 2× more assets under management. When SCHB receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging SCHV's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofSCHV's weight.
Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.
ETF Look-Through Dashboard
Replaces $249/yr MorningstarPeer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.
Weighted metrics calculated based on 85% of fund assets with available data.
Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index
Morningstar-Style Box
Sector & Cap Explorer
ETF Fundamental Radar
Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.
Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)
Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency
Based on 77% of fund weight with Piotroski data.
Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation. Data that Vanguard and BlackRock don't surface.
Dividend Safety True-Up
DeterministicThe dividend-paying companies inside SCHV collectively pay out 77% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This is stretched — a prolonged earnings slump could force constituent companies to cut dividends. Based on 59% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.
FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.
Earnings vs. Price Decomposition
ProprietarySCHV is up 28.4% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +17.7%. The remaining +10.7% of performance is driven by multiple expansion (P/E inflation) — prices rose faster than earnings grew.
Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 75% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.
Value Creation Map
ROIC vs WACCWhat percentage of SCHV's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?
Of SCHV's analyzed weight, 63% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 37% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.
ROIC-WACC spread for 64% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.
Passive Crowding Score
MODERATEHow much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.
SCHV has a Passive Crowding Score of 40/100. On average, 11.9% of the market capitalization of SCHV's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates moderate passive ownership density. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption activity can amplify short-term volatility in the underlying holdings.
Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 9 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.
Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents
| # | Ticker | Company | Weight | P/E | F-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BRKB | Berkshire Hathaway Inc | 3.12% | — | — |
| 2 | JPM | JPMorgan Chase & Co Financial Services | 2.76% | 14.3x | 3/9 |
| 3 | XOM | Exxon Mobil Corp Energy | 2.17% | 24.5x | 5/9 |
| 4 | JNJ | Johnson & Johnson Healthcare | 2.02% | 26.1x | 4/9 |
| 5 | WMT | Walmart Inc Consumer Defensive | 1.89% | 40.8x | 7/9 |
| 6 | MU | Micron Technology Inc Technology | 1.56% | 45.9x | 7/9 |
| 7 | ABBV | AbbVie Inc Healthcare | 1.38% | 106.2x | 7/9 |
| 8 | PG | Procter & Gamble Co/The Consumer Defensive | 1.32% | 21.0x | 6/9 |
| 9 | HD | Home Depot Inc/The Consumer Cyclical | 1.28% | 22.5x | 4/9 |
| 10 | CVX | Chevron Corp Energy | 1.19% | 31.7x | 6/9 |
| 11 | CAT | Caterpillar Inc Industrials | 1.17% | 43.7x | 6/9 |
| 12 | BAC | Bank of America Corp Financial Services | 1.13% | 12.8x | 5/9 |
| 13 | KO | Coca-Cola Co/The Consumer Defensive | 1.06% | 24.8x | 7/9 |
| 14 | CSCO | Cisco Systems Inc Technology | 1.06% | 40.1x | 8/9 |
| 15 | MRK | Merck & Co Inc Healthcare | 1.04% | 33.4x | 4/9 |
Historical Holdings Snapshots
Browse how SCHV’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.
2026-05-24
15 holdings · 24.1% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BRKB | 3.12% | 966,769 | $488.2M |
| 2 | JPM | 2.76% | 1,435,212 | $431.0M |
| 3 | XOM | 2.17% | 2,223,368 | $339.1M |
| 4 | JNJ | 2.02% | 1,270,210 | $315.6M |
| 5 | WMT | 1.89% | 2,311,887 | $295.8M |
| 6 | MU | 1.56% | 591,768 | $244.0M |
| 7 | ABBV | 1.38% | 931,799 | $216.3M |
| 8 | PG | 1.32% | 1,231,954 | $206.0M |
| 9 | HD | 1.28% | 524,786 | $199.8M |
| 10 | CVX | 1.19% | 997,858 | $186.4M |
| 11 | CAT | 1.17% | 246,720 | $183.3M |
| 12 | BAC | 1.13% | 3,542,014 | $176.5M |
| 13 | KO | 1.06% | 2,041,095 | $166.5M |
| 14 | CSCO | 1.06% | 2,077,624 | $165.1M |
| 15 | MRK | 1.04% | 1,308,555 | $162.0M |
2026-05-23
15 holdings · 24.1% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BRKB | 3.12% | 966,769 | $488.2M |
| 2 | JPM | 2.76% | 1,435,212 | $431.0M |
| 3 | XOM | 2.17% | 2,223,368 | $339.1M |
| 4 | JNJ | 2.02% | 1,270,210 | $315.6M |
| 5 | WMT | 1.89% | 2,311,887 | $295.8M |
| 6 | MU | 1.56% | 591,768 | $244.0M |
| 7 | ABBV | 1.38% | 931,799 | $216.3M |
| 8 | PG | 1.32% | 1,231,954 | $206.0M |
| 9 | HD | 1.28% | 524,786 | $199.8M |
| 10 | CVX | 1.19% | 997,858 | $186.4M |
| 11 | CAT | 1.17% | 246,720 | $183.3M |
| 12 | BAC | 1.13% | 3,542,014 | $176.5M |
| 13 | KO | 1.06% | 2,041,095 | $166.5M |
| 14 | CSCO | 1.06% | 2,077,624 | $165.1M |
| 15 | MRK | 1.04% | 1,308,555 | $162.0M |
2026-05-22
15 holdings · 24.1% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BRKB | 3.12% | 966,769 | $488.2M |
| 2 | JPM | 2.76% | 1,435,212 | $431.0M |
| 3 | XOM | 2.17% | 2,223,368 | $339.1M |
| 4 | JNJ | 2.02% | 1,270,210 | $315.6M |
| 5 | WMT | 1.89% | 2,311,887 | $295.8M |
| 6 | MU | 1.56% | 591,768 | $244.0M |
| 7 | ABBV | 1.38% | 931,799 | $216.3M |
| 8 | PG | 1.32% | 1,231,954 | $206.0M |
| 9 | HD | 1.28% | 524,786 | $199.8M |
| 10 | CVX | 1.19% | 997,858 | $186.4M |
| 11 | CAT | 1.17% | 246,720 | $183.3M |
| 12 | BAC | 1.13% | 3,542,014 | $176.5M |
| 13 | KO | 1.06% | 2,041,095 | $166.5M |
| 14 | CSCO | 1.06% | 2,077,624 | $165.1M |
| 15 | MRK | 1.04% | 1,308,555 | $162.0M |
2026-05-21
15 holdings · 24.1% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BRKB | 3.12% | 966,769 | $488.2M |
| 2 | JPM | 2.76% | 1,435,212 | $431.0M |
| 3 | XOM | 2.17% | 2,223,368 | $339.1M |
| 4 | JNJ | 2.02% | 1,270,210 | $315.6M |
| 5 | WMT | 1.89% | 2,311,887 | $295.8M |
| 6 | MU | 1.56% | 591,768 | $244.0M |
| 7 | ABBV | 1.38% | 931,799 | $216.3M |
| 8 | PG | 1.32% | 1,231,954 | $206.0M |
| 9 | HD | 1.28% | 524,786 | $199.8M |
| 10 | CVX | 1.19% | 997,858 | $186.4M |
| 11 | CAT | 1.17% | 246,720 | $183.3M |
| 12 | BAC | 1.13% | 3,542,014 | $176.5M |
| 13 | KO | 1.06% | 2,041,095 | $166.5M |
| 14 | CSCO | 1.06% | 2,077,624 | $165.1M |
| 15 | MRK | 1.04% | 1,308,555 | $162.0M |
2026-05-20
15 holdings · 24.1% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BRKB | 3.12% | 966,769 | $488.2M |
| 2 | JPM | 2.76% | 1,435,212 | $431.0M |
| 3 | XOM | 2.17% | 2,223,368 | $339.1M |
| 4 | JNJ | 2.02% | 1,270,210 | $315.6M |
| 5 | WMT | 1.89% | 2,311,887 | $295.8M |
| 6 | MU | 1.56% | 591,768 | $244.0M |
| 7 | ABBV | 1.38% | 931,799 | $216.3M |
| 8 | PG | 1.32% | 1,231,954 | $206.0M |
| 9 | HD | 1.28% | 524,786 | $199.8M |
| 10 | CVX | 1.19% | 997,858 | $186.4M |
| 11 | CAT | 1.17% | 246,720 | $183.3M |
| 12 | BAC | 1.13% | 3,542,014 | $176.5M |
| 13 | KO | 1.06% | 2,041,095 | $166.5M |
| 14 | CSCO | 1.06% | 2,077,624 | $165.1M |
| 15 | MRK | 1.04% | 1,308,555 | $162.0M |
2026-05-19
15 holdings · 24.1% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BRKB | 3.12% | 966,769 | $488.2M |
| 2 | JPM | 2.76% | 1,435,212 | $431.0M |
| 3 | XOM | 2.17% | 2,223,368 | $339.1M |
| 4 | JNJ | 2.02% | 1,270,210 | $315.6M |
| 5 | WMT | 1.89% | 2,311,887 | $295.8M |
| 6 | MU | 1.56% | 591,768 | $244.0M |
| 7 | ABBV | 1.38% | 931,799 | $216.3M |
| 8 | PG | 1.32% | 1,231,954 | $206.0M |
| 9 | HD | 1.28% | 524,786 | $199.8M |
| 10 | CVX | 1.19% | 997,858 | $186.4M |
| 11 | CAT | 1.17% | 246,720 | $183.3M |
| 12 | BAC | 1.13% | 3,542,014 | $176.5M |
| 13 | KO | 1.06% | 2,041,095 | $166.5M |
| 14 | CSCO | 1.06% | 2,077,624 | $165.1M |
| 15 | MRK | 1.04% | 1,308,555 | $162.0M |
Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
What Drove SCHV Today?
Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Yield & Income
Sector Drift Over Time
How SCHV’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.
Active Conviction Tracker
Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.
AUM & Capital Flow Tracker
Estimated assets under management derived from SEC filings and daily price movements — tracks how the fund's value evolves over time.
Estimated AUM derived from the latest SEC N-PORT filing TNA ($15.64B) scaled by daily price changes. Filing snapshots update when new regulatory filings are published (quarterly for most funds, daily for ARK).
Explore More
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.