The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicWMB trades at 31.3x earnings, roughly in line with its sector average of 34.8x. Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9) with Altman Z of 1.4.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of The Williams Companies reveal a capital structure heavily reliant on leverage to drive returns, evidenced by an Equity Multiplier of 3.91x that sustains a 17.5% ROE despite a negligible -0.1% spread between its 7.6% ROIC and 7.8% WACC. This narrow margin indicates the company is barely clearing its cost of capital, suggesting limited value creation from new investments relative to financing costs. While the Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 signals strong financial health and operational stability, the Altman Z-Score of 1.4 places the firm in a "grey zone" regarding bankruptcy risk, contrasting with a robust Beneish M-Score of -2.67 that effectively rules out earnings manipulation. The high net margin of 21.9% is underpinned by significant asset turnover constraints at just 0.20x, highlighting an industry characteristic where profitability stems more from pricing power than operational velocity rather than efficient capital deployment.
Valuation metrics suggest the market assigns a premium multiple of 33.6x to current earnings, which stands substantially above the sector average of 24.0x and implies aggressive expectations for future performance. This disparity aligns with an implied free cash flow growth rate of 26.3% over the last decade, yet it creates tension given the weak profitability factor score (RMW) of -0.592, which flags declining returns on retained earnings relative to peers. The current pricing appears to embed high-growth assumptions that may not be fully supported by a negative ROIC-WACC spread and an Altman Z-Score hovering near distress thresholds. Consequently, the stock trades at a valuation premium that demands sustained execution to justify the gap between its historical profitability trajectory and present-day multiple expansion.
Risk factors further complicate the investment thesis through divergent factor exposures and insider activity. The security exhibits a strong value tilt with an HML score of 0.671 but suffers from negative momentum relative to profitability, creating a mixed signal for long-term alpha generation alongside its notable Fama-French annualized alpha of 12.37%. Furthermore, net insider selling totaling $3.89 million over the past ninety days introduces a potential divergence between management's private information and public market sentiment. These elements collectively suggest that while historical factor performance has been robust, current structural risks and leadership signals warrant caution when assessing downside protection against the elevated valuation multiple.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 12% above its 5-year average P/E of 30.5x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedWestern Midstream's stock is currently trading above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, indicating a strong upward trend over recent months. The RSI reading of 65.6 suggests that the stock has been experiencing relatively high buying momentum recently but may be approaching levels where caution might be warranted as it moves into more overbought territory.
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
⚠️ Dividend consumes >80% of FCF — sustainability risk.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-13 | $0.5250 | +5.0% |
| 2025-12-12 | $0.5000 | 0.0% |
| 2025-09-12 | $0.5000 | 0.0% |
| 2025-06-13 | $0.5000 | 0.0% |
| 2025-03-14 | $0.5000 | +5.3% |
| 2024-12-13 | $0.4750 | 0.0% |
| 2024-09-13 | $0.4750 | 0.0% |
| 2024-06-07 | $0.4750 | 0.0% |
| 2024-03-07 | $0.4750 | +6.0% |
| 2023-12-07 | $0.4480 | 0.0% |
| 2023-09-08 | $0.4480 | 0.0% |
| 2023-06-09 | $0.4480 | 0.0% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XLE or IYE, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell WMB shares regardless of The Williams Companies, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $13.1B of passive capital is structurally linked to WMB through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in The Williams Companies, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Exxon Mobil Corp (XOM) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with WMB. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 33 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
WMB Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 7 WMB shares, reducing daily market volatility.
The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 4.5% of the State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and 4.4% of the IYE (IYE). Across 32 tracked ETFs, approximately 183M shares (14.9% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest WMB Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 32 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
WMB Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for The Williams Companies, Inc. over the past year sits near $59.30 (15% of 252-day volume). The current price of $71.31 trades 20.3% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (15% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
WMB Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does The Williams Companies, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
The Williams Companies, Inc. converts 12% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a low conversion rate suggesting heavy reinvestment. This may indicate a growth phase (building capacity) or structural capital intensity. The 88% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-0.1%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | 4 | $72.95 | $291.8 |
| 2026-05-04 | 420 | $75.54 | $31,726.8 |
| 2026-04-15 | 9 | $71.44 | $642.96 |
| 2026-04-06 | 35 | $72.00 | $2,520 |
| 2026-04-02 | 876 | $71.83 | $62,923.08 |
| 2026-03-25 | 122 | $74.46 | $9,084.12 |
| 2026-03-23 | 2 | $72.41 | $144.82 |
| 2026-03-11 | 179 | $73.84 | $13,217.36 |
| 2026-03-10 | 135,483 | $73.18 | $9.9M |
| 2026-03-02 | 19,197 | $74.72 | $1.4M |
| 2026-02-23 | 95,069 | $72.98 | $6.9M |
| 2026-02-13 | 93,459 | $71.13 | $6.6M |
| 2026-02-10 | 3,986 | $67.85 | $270,450.1 |
| 2026-02-09 | 170 | $66.92 | $11,376.4 |
| 2026-02-05 | 36 | $66.46 | $2,392.56 |
| 2026-02-04 | 126 | $68.50 | $8,631 |
| 2026-02-02 | 1,500 | $67.26 | $100,890 |
| 2026-01-26 | 154 | $64.96 | $10,003.84 |
| 2026-01-20 | 2,507 | $61.55 | $154,305.85 |
| 2026-01-13 | 100 | $59.56 | $5,956 |
| 2026-01-09 | 100 | $61.15 | $6,115 |
| 2025-12-04 | 36,176 | $61.55 | $2.2M |
| 2025-11-21 | 32,498 | $58.91 | $1.9M |
| 2025-11-19 | 6,467 | $59.17 | $382,652.39 |
| 2025-10-20 | 300 | $62.46 | $18,738 |
| 2025-10-16 | 253 | $63.78 | $16,136.34 |
| 2025-10-14 | 3,063 | $62.68 | $191,988.84 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| KMI | 0.804 | 0.808 | High co-movement |
| LNG | 0.519 | 0.389 | Moderate |
| TRGP | 0.505 | 0.542 | Moderate |
| OKE | 0.493 | 0.475 | Moderate |
| EQT | 0.481 | 0.384 | Moderate |
| EXE | 0.429 | 0.292 | Moderate |
| AROC | 0.420 | 0.388 | Moderate |
| DTE | 0.346 | 0.320 | Moderate |
| KGS | 0.338 | 0.304 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare WMB to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.