Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicTRGP trades at 26.1x earnings, roughly in line with its sector average of 34.8x. Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 2.6.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedTarga Resources Corp. demonstrates robust capital efficiency with a 12.2% ROIC significantly outpacing its 8.6% WACC, generating a +3.5% spread that indicates strong value creation potential. This high return is primarily driven by substantial leverage rather than operational expansion; the DuPont decomposition reveals an equity multiplier of 7.89x dominating a modest asset turnover of 0.68x and net margins of 11.3%. While the Beneish M-Score of -3.06 suggests low earnings manipulation risk, the Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 signals moderate financial strength, and an Altman Z-Score of 2.6 places the firm in a gray zone regarding bankruptcy safety margins.
Valuation metrics suggest the market is pricing in aggressive growth expectations that may not align with current operational realities. The stock trades at a premium 28.8x P/E compared to the sector average of 24.0x, while implied free cash flow growth over ten years stands at an exceptionally high 29.1%. This valuation gap implies investors are anticipating rapid expansion despite revenue growing only 4% year-over-year and profitability factors showing weakness with a -0.397 RMW score. The discrepancy between the lofty multiple and tepid top-line growth creates a scenario where any miss in future earnings could precipitate a sharp re-rating downward.
Risk-adjusted performance data presents a conflicting narrative for long-term alpha generation. Although the stock exhibits a distinct value tilt with an HML factor of 1.129, it has underperformed on a risk-adjusted basis over the last year, recording a Fama-French annualized alpha of -7.66%. Compounding this technical weakness is significant insider activity, evidenced by $25.4 million in net selling over the past ninety days. These factors collectively suggest that while the underlying economics support high returns on invested capital, current market pricing and recent behavioral signals indicate elevated downside risk relative to historical valuations.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 11% above its 5-year average P/E of 25.9x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedThe current price of TRGP is well above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, indicating a strong upward trend in the short to medium term. The RSI reading at 67.3 suggests that momentum remains robust but close to overbought territory, which could signal potential for some consolidation or pullback soon.
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
⚠️ Dividend consumes >80% of FCF — sustainability risk.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-30 | $1.2500 | +25.0% |
| 2026-01-30 | $1.0000 | 0.0% |
| 2025-10-31 | $1.0000 | 0.0% |
| 2025-07-31 | $1.0000 | 0.0% |
| 2025-04-30 | $1.0000 | +33.3% |
| 2025-01-31 | $0.7500 | 0.0% |
| 2024-10-31 | $0.7500 | 0.0% |
| 2024-07-31 | $0.7500 | 0.0% |
| 2024-04-29 | $0.7500 | +50.0% |
| 2024-01-30 | $0.5000 | 0.0% |
| 2023-10-30 | $0.5000 | 0.0% |
| 2023-07-28 | $0.5000 | 0.0% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XLE or VDE, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell TRGP shares regardless of Targa Resources Corp.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $9.4B of passive capital is structurally linked to TRGP through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Targa Resources Corp. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies EXXON MOBIL CORP (XOM) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with TRGP. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 28 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
TRGP Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 6 TRGP shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP) exerts notable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 3.2% of the State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and 2.2% of the VDE (VDE). Across 27 tracked ETFs, approximately 37M shares (17.4% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest TRGP Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 27 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
TRGP Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Targa Resources Corp. over the past year sits near $166.55 (24% of 252-day volume). The current price of $263.30 trades 58.1% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (24% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
TRGP Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Targa Resources Corp. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Targa Resources Corp. converts 12% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a low conversion rate suggesting heavy reinvestment. This may indicate a growth phase (building capacity) or structural capital intensity. The 88% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 3.7% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-30 | 598 | $250.14 | $149,583.72 |
| 2026-04-21 | 1,724 | $231.51 | $399,123.24 |
| 2026-04-15 | 3 | $239.28 | $717.84 |
| 2026-04-09 | 170 | $244.00 | $41,480 |
| 2026-04-08 | 558 | $250.98 | $140,046.84 |
| 2026-04-01 | 3 | $250.73 | $752.19 |
| 2026-03-31 | 2 | $248.09 | $496.18 |
| 2026-03-25 | 22 | $246.10 | $5,414.2 |
| 2026-03-23 | 62 | $237.41 | $14,719.42 |
| 2026-03-10 | 1,634 | $234.74 | $383,565.16 |
| 2026-03-02 | 41 | $235.80 | $9,667.8 |
| 2026-02-26 | 4,719 | $230.14 | $1.1M |
| 2026-02-13 | 1,869 | $218.26 | $407,927.94 |
| 2026-02-09 | 1,374 | $211.44 | $290,518.56 |
| 2026-01-30 | 3 | $201.52 | $604.56 |
| 2026-01-28 | 8,324 | $195.04 | $1.6M |
| 2026-01-15 | 3,242 | $182.78 | $592,572.76 |
| 2026-01-12 | 27 | $176.86 | $4,775.22 |
| 2026-01-06 | 2 | $183.47 | $366.94 |
| 2025-12-24 | 2 | $184.79 | $369.58 |
| 2025-11-14 | 28,749 | $169.71 | $4.9M |
| 2025-10-24 | 94 | $156.80 | $14,739.2 |
| 2025-10-16 | 1 | $151.06 | $151.06 |
| 2025-10-08 | 17,470 | $166.44 | $2.9M |
| 2025-10-03 | 384 | $162.65 | $62,457.6 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| OKE | 0.730 | 0.669 | High co-movement |
| DVN | 0.585 | 0.555 | Moderate |
| COP | 0.572 | 0.547 | Moderate |
| FANG | 0.560 | 0.538 | Moderate |
| EOG | 0.546 | 0.498 | Moderate |
| APA | 0.543 | 0.521 | Moderate |
| KMI | 0.537 | 0.569 | Moderate |
| CTRA | 0.528 | 0.520 | Moderate |
| AROC | 0.524 | 0.435 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare TRGP to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.