Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 20.2x earnings — a 69% discount to the sector average of 65.2x — BSX is in the lower valuation range. Financial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 7/9, Altman Z 3.9 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold). DCF fair value of $75 suggests 19% upside based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of Boston Scientific present a nuanced profile where strong top-line momentum contrasts with capital efficiency constraints. While the company demonstrates robust revenue expansion at 19.9% year-over-year and maintains healthy profitability metrics, including a net margin of 14.4% and an Altman Z-Score of 4.2 indicating low bankruptcy risk, its return on invested capital (ROIC) of 7.7% falls short of the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) at 8.7%. This negative spread of -1.0% suggests that current operations are generating returns below the hurdle rate required to satisfy investors, despite a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 signaling strong financial health and limited earnings manipulation risk per the Beneish M-Score of -2.52. The DuPont decomposition reveals that an equity multiplier of 1.78x is amplifying returns; however, this leverage masks underlying inefficiencies in asset utilization relative to capital costs.
Valuation metrics suggest the market assigns a premium consistent with growth expectations but potentially overstates near-term value creation given the return on capital dynamics. The current P/E ratio of 32.4x sits above the sector average of 30.8x, reflecting investor confidence in sustained performance rather than just cyclical recovery. A discounted cash flow model implies a fair value of $81 with an upside potential of 28.9%, contingent on realizing free cash flows growing at an implied annualized rate of 11.5% over the next decade. This forward-looking growth assumption appears aggressive when weighed against the fact that current ROIC fails to cover the cost of capital, creating a divergence between discounted valuation models and actual economic value generation in the present period.
Risk-adjusted performance indicators highlight significant headwinds despite fundamental solidity. The Fama-French alpha stands at -36.82% annually, indicating underperformance relative to size and book-to-market factors over time. Furthermore, the Profitability Factor (RMW) registers a weak score of -0.498, suggesting that while margins remain elevated, the stock struggles within the profitability dimension of factor investing models. Compounding these quantitative signals is notable insider activity, with $15 million in net selling recorded over the last 90 days, which often precedes or accompanies periods where management anticipates valuation compression or seeks to rebalance personal holdings against a backdrop of stretched multiples and suboptimal capital returns.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 20% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 7.1% | 9.1% | 11.1% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $96 | $65 | $48 |
| 3% | $117 | $75 | $54 |
| 4% | $154 | $89 | $61 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $47.68.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=9.1%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $75 (+18.8%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 34% below its 5-year average P/E of 48.2x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedThe current trading environment for Boston Scientific Corporation reflects a period of consolidation where larger market participants appear to be accumulating positions near the $52.68 level. The proximity of short-term moving averages to longer-term trends suggests that institutional capital may be pausing aggressive directional moves, potentially waiting for clearer confirmation before committing significant volume. This behavior often indicates that sophisticated players are assessing valuation relative to broader sector headwinds rather than reacting impulsively to minor price fluctuations. Volume patterns in this range frequently serve as a critical filter for distinguishing between passive holding and active accumulation. If trading activity remains elevated while the stock trades sideways, it implies that institutions are absorbing shares from retail sellers without driving the price significantly higher or lower, effectively creating a liquidity buffer. Conversely, any sudden divergence where volume spikes alongside price breaks could signal a shift in institutional sentiment toward either aggressive deployment of capital into healthcare equities or a strategic withdrawal to preserve dry powder for other opportunities. The interplay between these technical signals and the current sector dynamics creates a complex landscape for large-scale investors. The lack of definitive momentum breakouts suggests that major players are currently in a neutral stance, balancing exposure against regulatory uncertainties within the medical device industry. Observers should note that without a decisive move accompanied by sustained volume expansion, the prevailing structure continues to favor cautious positioning rather than immediate allocation or liquidation strategies.
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like IHI or XLV, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell BSX shares regardless of Boston Scientific Corporation's individual fundamentals. We estimate $10.7B of passive capital is structurally linked to BSX through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Boston Scientific Corporation to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Abbott Laboratories (ABT) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with BSX. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 31 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
BSX Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 8 BSX shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 4.2% of the IHI (IHI) and 1.6% of the State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Across 30 tracked ETFs, approximately 176M shares (11.8% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest BSX Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 30 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
BSX Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Boston Scientific Corporation over the past year sits near $98.63 (12% of 252-day volume). The current price of $47.68 sits 51.7% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level. The highly concentrated volume profile (12% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
BSX Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Boston Scientific Corporation convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Boston Scientific Corporation converts 67% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-1.4%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 9 | $53.06 | $477.54 |
| 2026-05-13 | 21,439 | $54.10 | $1.2M |
| 2026-05-08 | 8,866 | $56.57 | $501,549.62 |
| 2026-05-05 | 39,690 | $56.85 | $2.3M |
| 2026-05-04 | 102 | $56.50 | $5,763 |
| 2026-05-01 | 177,348 | $57.61 | $10.2M |
| 2026-04-27 | 3,017 | $62.07 | $187,265.19 |
| 2026-04-23 | 26 | $64.87 | $1,686.62 |
| 2026-04-22 | 193 | $59.52 | $11,487.36 |
| 2026-04-20 | 24,279 | $64.23 | $1.6M |
| 2026-04-17 | 43 | $63.42 | $2,727.06 |
| 2026-04-15 | 87 | $63.82 | $5,552.34 |
| 2026-04-14 | 12 | $63.18 | $758.16 |
| 2026-04-10 | 100 | $61.28 | $6,128 |
| 2026-04-09 | 32 | $62.56 | $2,001.92 |
| 2026-03-31 | 684 | $62.93 | $43,044.12 |
| 2026-03-25 | 148 | $68.15 | $10,086.2 |
| 2026-03-24 | 50 | $69.54 | $3,477 |
| 2026-03-23 | 102,896 | $69.48 | $7.1M |
| 2026-03-11 | 413 | $69.96 | $28,893.48 |
| 2026-03-06 | 1,085 | $72.99 | $79,194.15 |
| 2026-02-19 | 458 | $76.28 | $34,936.24 |
| 2026-02-13 | 2,082 | $74.12 | $154,317.84 |
| 2026-02-09 | 1,645 | $76.27 | $125,464.15 |
| 2026-02-05 | 1 | $75.50 | $75.5 |
| 2026-02-04 | 44 | $91.62 | $4,031.28 |
| 2026-01-27 | 13,591 | $93.55 | $1.3M |
| 2026-01-26 | 13,472 | $92.51 | $1.2M |
| 2026-01-22 | 10 | $91.71 | $917.1 |
| 2026-01-20 | 100 | $88.07 | $8,807 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| SYK | 0.370 | 0.288 | Moderate |
| COR | 0.339 | 0.366 | Moderate |
| EW | 0.333 | 0.256 | Moderate |
| ENPH | -0.326 | -0.454 | Inverse / hedge |
| CAH | 0.286 | 0.268 | Low correlation |
| TROW | 0.280 | 0.270 | Low correlation |
| ISRG | 0.278 | 0.198 | Low correlation |
| MDT | 0.274 | 0.283 | Low correlation |
| NTRA | 0.268 | 0.287 | Low correlation |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare BSX to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.