International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 23.5x earnings — a 36% discount to the sector average of 36.7x — IFF is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 1.3.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. currently reflect a distressed operational cycle, characterized by an ROIC-WACC spread of -10.2% and negative net margins at -3.3%. This poor capital efficiency is mathematically decomposed via DuPont analysis into weak asset turnover of 0.43x dragging down returns despite moderate leverage; however, the Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 suggests underlying financial stability that contrasts sharply with the Altman Z-Score of 1.2, which flags potential distress risks. While the Beneish M-Score of -2.47 indicates low earnings manipulation risk and gross margins remain robust at 36.2%, revenue contraction of -5.2% year-over-year highlights a disconnect between top-line volume and profitability. The Fama-French alpha data further complicates this picture, showing negative performance relative to the market (-7.97%) and value factors (-0.355), yet offset by positive exposure to robust profitability characteristics (RMW: 0.453).
Valuation metrics present a significant divergence between historical norms and current pricing realities. The stock trades at a P/E multiple substantially below the sector average of 36.1x, suggesting market discounting is already priced in. However, this compression conflicts with an implied free cash flow growth trajectory of 27.2% over ten years, which would typically command a premium valuation rather than a deep value setup. This discrepancy implies that current pricing may be reacting disproportionately to near-term margin pressures and revenue declines while ignoring the long-term growth assumptions embedded in forward models. The market appears to be penalizing earnings volatility more heavily than fundamental quality metrics might justify given the strong profitability factor score.
Risk assessment reveals conflicting signals regarding future trajectory. While insider activity over the last 90 days shows $11,966,533 in net buying, potentially signaling confidence from those with superior information access, the negative Fama-French alpha and low Altman Z-Score introduce substantial downside risk if operational turnaround fails to materialize quickly. The combination of a high profitability factor score against a backdrop of shrinking revenues creates an asymmetric scenario where any stabilization in asset turnover could unlock significant value, whereas further margin erosion would exacerbate the already tight liquidity position indicated by the Altman metric.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedThe current trading environment for International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. presents a complex risk profile where the $75.25 price point sits within a sector characterized by cyclical volatility inherent to basic materials. While specific drawdown metrics are not provided in this snapshot, the fundamental backdrop of the chemical and fragrance industry often subjects equity prices to sharp corrections when raw material costs fluctuate or demand slows globally. This suggests that any upward momentum observed near these levels may be fragile rather than structural, potentially susceptible to sudden reversion if macroeconomic headwinds intensify. Volatility in this segment frequently acts as a double-edged sword; it can amplify gains during periods of commodity price surges but also accelerates losses when supply chain disruptions occur or consumer spending tightens. The absence of clear trend confirmation data implies that the asset is currently navigating a transitional phase where technical support levels may be tested more aggressively than usual. Investors must weigh whether recent price stability represents a genuine consolidation following a downturn or merely a temporary pause before further downside pressure from sector-wide headwinds takes hold. Ultimately, the interplay between current valuation and underlying industry fundamentals indicates that risk dynamics remain elevated. Without corroborating data on volume profiles or longer-term moving averages, it remains uncertain if the price action reflects sustainable value realization or speculative positioning vulnerable to rapid unwinding. The market structure appears sensitive to external shocks typical of the basic materials sector, meaning that momentum signals derived solely from current pricing could misrepresent the true resilience of
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
⚠️ Dividend consumes >80% of FCF — sustainability risk.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-20 | $0.4000 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-19 | $0.4000 | 0.0% |
| 2025-09-29 | $0.4000 | 0.0% |
| 2025-06-20 | $0.4000 | 0.0% |
| 2025-03-21 | $0.4000 | 0.0% |
| 2024-12-20 | $0.4000 | 0.0% |
| 2024-09-20 | $0.4000 | 0.0% |
| 2024-06-21 | $0.4000 | 0.0% |
| 2024-03-21 | $0.4000 | -50.6% |
| 2023-12-27 | $0.8100 | 0.0% |
| 2023-09-21 | $0.8100 | 0.0% |
| 2023-06-22 | $0.8100 | 0.0% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XLB or VAW, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell IFF shares regardless of International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $2.5B of passive capital is structurally linked to IFF through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Linde plc (LIN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with IFF. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 28 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
IFF Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 7 IFF shares, reducing daily market volatility.
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF) exerts notable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 2.4% of the State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) and 1.1% of the VAW (VAW). Across 28 tracked ETFs, approximately 39M shares (15.3% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest IFF Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 28 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
IFF Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. over the past year sits near $64.56 (12% of 252-day volume). The current price of $73.24 trades 13.5% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
IFF Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. converts 33% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 67% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-10.4%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 3,432 | $77.48 | $265,911.36 |
| 2026-05-13 | 9,508 | $78.47 | $746,092.76 |
| 2026-05-04 | 8,539 | $70.81 | $604,646.59 |
| 2026-04-30 | 94 | $68.89 | $6,475.66 |
| 2026-04-15 | 3 | $72.59 | $217.77 |
| 2026-04-10 | 102 | $73.13 | $7,459.26 |
| 2026-03-25 | 25 | $67.90 | $1,697.5 |
| 2026-03-10 | 555 | $73.16 | $40,603.8 |
| 2026-03-06 | 6,394 | $75.38 | $481,979.72 |
| 2026-03-03 | 676 | $80.75 | $54,587 |
| 2026-03-02 | 1,967 | $82.23 | $161,746.41 |
| 2026-02-27 | 70,274 | $80.94 | $5.7M |
| 2026-02-26 | 61,786 | $79.88 | $4.9M |
| 2026-02-23 | 1,317 | $81.39 | $107,190.63 |
| 2026-02-20 | 485 | $81.62 | $39,585.7 |
| 2026-02-18 | 9,395 | $82.74 | $777,342.3 |
| 2026-02-09 | 806 | $74.82 | $60,304.92 |
| 2026-01-30 | 109 | $69.60 | $7,586.4 |
| 2026-01-26 | 86,342 | $73.23 | $6.3M |
| 2026-01-21 | 29,702 | $70.86 | $2.1M |
| 2026-01-20 | 5,580 | $71.68 | $399,974.4 |
| 2026-01-15 | 69,027 | $70.18 | $4.8M |
| 2026-01-14 | 8,469 | $69.61 | $589,527.09 |
| 2026-01-07 | 2,727 | $68.87 | $187,808.49 |
| 2026-01-02 | 182 | $67.39 | $12,264.98 |
| 2025-12-31 | 7,311 | $67.93 | $496,636.23 |
| 2025-12-23 | 237 | $66.57 | $15,777.09 |
| 2025-12-11 | 265 | $65.39 | $17,328.35 |
| 2025-12-10 | 216 | $64.54 | $13,940.64 |
| 2025-12-01 | 110 | $69.48 | $7,642.8 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| PPG | 0.619 | 0.559 | Moderate |
| MAS | 0.553 | 0.548 | Moderate |
| NDSN | 0.537 | 0.493 | Moderate |
| VRTPX | 0.536 | 0.445 | Moderate |
| AVY | 0.535 | 0.484 | Moderate |
| SHW | 0.528 | 0.501 | Moderate |
| BALL | 0.527 | 0.475 | Moderate |
| DD | 0.527 | 0.407 | Moderate |
| ITW | 0.523 | 0.456 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare IFF to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.