Industrials / Specialty Industrial Machinery

Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK)

$463.41
+1.47%
$50.2B
Market Cap
46.9
P/E Ratio
1.56
Beta
1.22%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 7/9Altman Z 5.3 SafeBeneish M -2.71 CleanROIC−WACC -2.8%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

ROK trades at 46.9x earnings, roughly in line with its sector average of 44.7x. Financial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 7/9, Altman Z 5.3 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold). DCF fair value of $198 implies 51% downside based on model assumptions.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of this Industrials leader present a complex dichotomy between current profitability drivers and capital efficiency. While the DuPont decomposition reveals that an ROE of 23.4% is primarily fueled by significant financial leverage (Equity Multiplier of 3.02x) rather than operational margin expansion or asset turnover, the underlying business quality metrics suggest resilience. A Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and a Beneish M-Score of -2.71 indicate strong balance sheet health with low earnings manipulation risk, yet this is counterbalanced by an ROIC-WACC spread of -2.6%, signaling that current returns on invested capital fail to cover the cost of capital. This negative spread implies value destruction at the margin despite the high nominal return generated through leverage.

Valuation metrics currently reflect a significant premium relative to historical norms and peer averages, with a P/E ratio of 41.7x trading substantially above the sector average of 32.1x. Discounted cash flow analysis suggests the market is pricing in aggressive future performance, specifically an implied free cash flow growth rate of 23.4% over ten years; however, this optimism appears misaligned with fundamentals as the DCF fair value implies a -43.8% downside from current levels. The disconnect between the high valuation multiple and negative intrinsic value suggests that market expectations are far more optimistic than what the current ROIC-WACC spread justifies.

Risk-adjusted performance indicators further complicate the investment thesis, highlighting divergent factor exposures. Although the stock exhibits a strong Fama-French Alpha of 17.94% annually, indicating outperformance relative to traditional risk factors, this is offset by negative signals in profitability (RMW: -0.331) and minimal value tilt (HML: 0.121). Compounding these fundamental concerns is notable insider activity, with $23.6 million in net selling over the past ninety days, which may signal management's view on near-term liquidity or valuation levels despite the company's solid credit profile indicated by an Altman Z-Score of 5.0.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive
Market Price
$463.41
Fair Value
$196
Implied Upside
-57.8%
$196IMPLIED FAIR VALUEOVERVALUEDOVERUNDER
Growth Rate (Y1–5)18%
-10%20%50%
Discount Rate (WACC)13.7%
5%12.5%20%

5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.

Reverse DCFMarket-Implied
25.6%annual FCF growth priced in at $463.41

The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 1% YoY revenue.

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →11.7%13.7%15.7%
2%$231$184$151
3%$253$198$161
4%$282$215$172

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $463.41.

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=13.7%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $198 (-51.4%). Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

46.9x
ROK P/E
44.7x
Sector Avg
52.6x
5Y Avg P/E
+5%
vs Sector

Currently trading 14% below its 5-year average P/E of 52.6x.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Technical Setup

AI Generated

The stock is trading slightly below its 200-day moving average and well under the 50-day moving average, indicating a short-term bearish trend. The RSI at 34.7 suggests that near-term momentum may be weak but not yet in oversold territory, hinting at potential stabilization or slight recovery.

RSI (14)
SMA 50
SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

7/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
5.3
Altman Z-Score
Safe Zone — above 3.0 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.71
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

48.1%
Gross Margin
10.4%
Net Margin
10.9%
ROIC
13.7%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -2.8%— Negative spread.
+0.9%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-8.8%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
1.4B
Free Cash Flow
44%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

10.4%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.74x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
3.02x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
23.4%
Return on Equity
⚠️ High equity multiplier — ROE is being amplified by leverage, not operational excellence.

Balance Sheet Health

2.02x
Debt / Equity
1.14x
Current Ratio
6.9x
Interest Coverage
1.5x
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.91%
FCF Yield
1.4B
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
-$24M
Net Selling
0
Buy Transactions
9
Sale Transactions
2026-03-02BUTTERMORE ROBERT L.Sold 5/6 qtrsSale$4M
2026-03-02BUTTERMORE ROBERT L.Sold 5/6 qtrsGrant$2M
2026-02-26NARDECCHIA CHRISTOPHERSold 4/6 qtrsSale$6M
2026-02-26NARDECCHIA CHRISTOPHERSold 4/6 qtrsGrant$3M
2026-02-25GENEREUX SCOTT ASold 4/6 qtrsSale$7M

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $2.12
Act: $2.45
+15.8%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $2.67
Act: $2.82
+5.7%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $2.94
Act: $3.34
+13.6%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $2.48
Act: $2.75
+10.7%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Dividend History

$1.3800
Latest Dividend
$5.31
2025 Total
+4.9%
YoY Growth
9 yrs
Consecutive Increases
Annual Dividends per Share
$1.48
2016
$3.12
2017
$3.64
2018
$3.93
2019
$4.13
2020
$4.33
2021
$4.54
2022
$4.79
2023
$5.06
2024
$5.31
2025
$2.76
2026
DateAmountChange
2026-05-18$1.38000.0%
2026-02-23$1.38000.0%
2025-11-17$1.3800+5.3%
2025-08-18$1.31000.0%
2025-05-19$1.31000.0%
2025-02-18$1.31000.0%
2024-11-18$1.3100+4.8%
2024-08-12$1.25000.0%
2024-05-10$1.25000.0%
2024-02-16$1.25000.0%
2023-11-10$1.2500+5.9%
2023-08-11$1.18000.0%
Stock Splits
1987-04-14: 2:11983-06-20: 2:1

Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.

Risk Profile

31.9%
Annual Volatility
1.83
Sharpe (1Y)
-19.8%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure

Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.

1.19
Market β
Mkt-RF
+0.350
Size (SMB)
Small-cap tilt
+0.121
Value (HML)
Value tilt
-0.331
Profit (RMW)
Weak
+0.469
Invest (CMA)
Conservative
Alpha (annual): +17.94%
R²: 59.2%of variance explained by 5 factors

Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.

Fundamentals

31.1
Forward P/E
2.41
PEG Ratio
14.25
Price/Book
839615
Avg Volume
$463.49
52W High
$305.44
52W Low
100%
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$6.6B
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding ROK
0.10%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$6.6T
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XLI or VIS, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell ROK shares regardless of Rockwell Automation, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $6.6B of passive capital is structurally linked to ROK through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in Rockwell Automation, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

ROK Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
ROKEpicenterVTIETFVOOETFIVVETFCATLow RiskGELow RiskVRTLow RiskCATLow RiskGEVLow Risk
ROK Price Drop (%)0

If Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies CATERPILLAR INC (CAT) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with ROK. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 34 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

ROK Ownership Dynamics

Passive funds hold 1 in every 7 ROK shares, reducing daily market volatility.

Ticker
ROK
Total Shares
111M
ETF Lock-Up
15.3%
Display Mode
Total Float Impact
15.3%Locked Float

Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK) exerts notable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 0.9% of the State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLI) and 0.7% of the VIS (VIS). Across 34 tracked ETFs, approximately 17M shares (15.3% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.

Float lock-up computed from 34 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

ROK Institutional Volume Profile

252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.

TICKER
ROK
PRICE
$463.41
FLOOR (POC)
$346.99
STRENGTH
High
$306$314$323$331$33912%$347POC 13%$3557%$363$371$380$3887%$3968%$40410%$4126%$420$429$437$445$453$461$463.41
Focus Zone
Point of Control (POC) Support (below price) Resistance (above price) Current Price

The highest-volume price zone for Rockwell Automation, Inc. over the past year sits near $346.99 (13% of 252-day volume). The current price of $463.41 trades 33.6% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (13% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.

Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.

ROK Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does Rockwell Automation, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$1.4B
EBITDA
$1.4B
FCF Conversion
97%
Reinvestment Rate
3%
97% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
10.9%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-2.8%

Rockwell Automation, Inc. converts 97% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-2.8%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-14225$454.99$102,372.75
2026-05-129$456.66$4,109.94
2026-05-064,398$435.93$1.9M
2026-04-1623,189$397.40$9.2M
2026-04-153$405.27$1,215.81
2026-04-13399$396.00$158,004
2026-04-07160$367.18$58,748.8
2026-03-2511$361.22$3,973.42
2026-03-19549$355.11$194,955.39
2026-03-10254$375.55$95,389.7
2026-03-02476$407.45$193,946.2
2026-02-19172$396.46$68,191.12
2026-02-091,678$415.02$696,403.56
2026-01-2838,562$419.75$16.2M
2026-01-2095$415.52$39,474.4
2026-01-128$410.53$3,284.24
2025-12-3136$393.68$14,172.48
2025-12-3040$396.48$15,859.2
2025-12-10119$400.61$47,672.59
2025-11-24189,145$378.73$71.6M
2025-11-202,772$372.48$1.0M
2025-11-17300$377.13$113,139
2025-11-1029$373.49$10,831.21
2025-10-305,320$368.15$2.0M
2025-10-20100$347.66$34,766

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Price Correlations

Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.

Peer252-Day (1Y)126-Day (6M)Direction
WTGXXNaNNaN
EMR0.7310.755High co-movement
PH0.6680.655Moderate
DIS0.6310.470Moderate
IR0.5980.604Moderate
CMI0.5850.682Moderate
TRMB0.5750.494Moderate
MS0.5690.613Moderate
AME0.5690.591Moderate
CAT0.5670.608Moderate

Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.

Compare ROK to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.