Starbucks Corporation (SBUX)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicSBUX trades at 75.7x earnings — a 116% premium to its sector average of 35.0x — without a dominant ROIC-WACC spread. Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 2.7. DCF fair value of $22 implies 78% downside based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation efficiency of the firm presents a stark contradiction between operational cash generation and reported equity returns. While the ROIC-WACC spread remains positive at 1.2%, indicating that operating assets generate value above the cost of capital, the DuPont decomposition reveals a leveraged distortion driving an anomalous negative ROE of -22.9%. This negative return is mechanically driven by an equity multiplier of -3.96x rather than deteriorating margins or turnover, suggesting complex balance sheet restructuring or buyback mechanics are suppressing book value despite healthy gross and net margins alongside robust profitability factor scores. Fundamental quality indicators remain mixed; the Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 signals moderate financial strength, while a Beneish M-Score of -2.77 strongly corroborates earnings integrity, yet an Altman Z-Score of 2.7 places the entity in the gray zone regarding bankruptcy risk relative to peers.
Valuation metrics suggest significant market divergence from intrinsic value models and historical norms. Trading at a P/E ratio of 75.3x versus a sector average of 57.0x, the stock commands a substantial premium that appears misaligned with its DCF-derived fair value of $22, which implies -75.7% downside from current levels based on an assumed 18.1% ten-year free cash flow growth rate. This discrepancy indicates the market is pricing in aggressive future expansion or intangible brand moats not fully captured by standard discounted cash flow assumptions, creating a wide gap between consensus expectations and model-based valuations.
Risk-adjusted performance data highlights substantial underperformance relative to factor benchmarks over the trailing period. The Fama-French alpha of -22.05% annually demonstrates that recent returns have failed to compensate for systematic risk exposure, even as the Profitability Factor (RMW) remains robust at 0.468 and value tilt is neutral. Compounding this technical weakness with insider activity showing $460,974 in net selling over the last ninety days, the current price structure appears detached from both fundamental cash flow realities and recent insider sentiment, leaving investors to weigh whether high valuation multiples are justified by future growth or represent a significant overhang of downside risk.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 3% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 7.9% | 9.9% | 11.9% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $28 | $18 | $13 |
| 3% | $34 | $22 | $14 |
| 4% | $44 | $26 | $17 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $95.51.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=9.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $22 (-77.9%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 43% above its 5-year average P/E of 56.3x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedStarbucks stock is currently trading above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, indicating a strong uptrend with continued bullish momentum as supported by the elevated RSI reading over 68. The short-term average has pulled well ahead of the long-term one, suggesting that recent buying pressure is outpacing longer-term trends.
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
⚠️ Dividend consumes >80% of FCF — sustainability risk.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-15 | $0.6200 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-13 | $0.6200 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-14 | $0.6200 | +1.6% |
| 2025-08-15 | $0.6100 | 0.0% |
| 2025-05-16 | $0.6100 | 0.0% |
| 2025-02-14 | $0.6100 | 0.0% |
| 2024-11-15 | $0.6100 | +7.0% |
| 2024-08-16 | $0.5700 | 0.0% |
| 2024-05-16 | $0.5700 | 0.0% |
| 2024-02-08 | $0.5700 | 0.0% |
| 2023-11-09 | $0.5700 | +7.5% |
| 2023-08-10 | $0.5300 | 0.0% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XLY or VCR, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell SBUX shares regardless of Starbucks Corporation's individual fundamentals. We estimate $15.6B of passive capital is structurally linked to SBUX through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Starbucks Corporation to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies AMAZON.COM INC (AMZN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with SBUX. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 31 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
SBUX Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 7 SBUX shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 2.7% of the State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLY) and 1.8% of the VCR (VCR). Across 31 tracked ETFs, approximately 168M shares (14.7% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest SBUX Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 31 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
SBUX Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Starbucks Corporation over the past year sits near $84.12 (12% of 252-day volume). The current price of $95.51 trades 13.5% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
SBUX Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Starbucks Corporation convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Starbucks Corporation converts 51% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 1.2% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 103 | $105.95 | $10,912.85 |
| 2026-05-11 | 6,715 | $104.93 | $704,604.95 |
| 2026-05-08 | 2,124 | $104.26 | $221,448.24 |
| 2026-05-07 | 3,820 | $106.44 | $406,600.8 |
| 2026-05-05 | 20 | $104.97 | $2,099.4 |
| 2026-05-04 | 1,904 | $105.90 | $201,633.6 |
| 2026-04-30 | 17,143 | $105.50 | $1.8M |
| 2026-04-29 | 1,365 | $97.28 | $132,787.2 |
| 2026-04-28 | 1,916 | $97.89 | $187,557.24 |
| 2026-04-27 | 5 | $98.67 | $493.35 |
| 2026-04-24 | 1,966 | $99.54 | $195,695.64 |
| 2026-04-23 | 3,308 | $99.52 | $329,212.16 |
| 2026-04-21 | 111 | $98.95 | $10,983.45 |
| 2026-04-16 | 3 | $98.34 | $295.02 |
| 2026-04-15 | 9 | $98.47 | $886.23 |
| 2026-04-14 | 491 | $97.48 | $47,862.68 |
| 2026-04-13 | 1,000 | $96.60 | $96,600 |
| 2026-04-10 | 960 | $96.92 | $93,043.2 |
| 2026-04-09 | 83 | $97.21 | $8,068.43 |
| 2026-04-08 | 5,324 | $95.21 | $506,898.04 |
| 2026-04-07 | 200 | $94.78 | $18,956 |
| 2026-04-06 | 93,976 | $90.37 | $8.5M |
| 2026-04-01 | 389 | $89.59 | $34,850.51 |
| 2026-03-31 | 10,392 | $86.72 | $901,194.24 |
| 2026-03-27 | 52 | $91.22 | $4,743.44 |
| 2026-03-26 | 28,789 | $92.70 | $2.7M |
| 2026-03-25 | 114 | $91.98 | $10,485.72 |
| 2026-03-24 | 12,050 | $93.83 | $1.1M |
| 2026-03-23 | 12,050 | $92.55 | $1.1M |
| 2026-03-16 | 1,000 | $99.15 | $99,150 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| SWK | 0.485 | 0.484 | Moderate |
| HLT | 0.476 | 0.438 | Moderate |
| MGM | 0.467 | 0.475 | Moderate |
| MAR | 0.464 | 0.418 | Moderate |
| HST | 0.457 | 0.389 | Moderate |
| IP | 0.449 | 0.402 | Moderate |
| TGT | 0.443 | 0.413 | Moderate |
| DD | 0.437 | 0.388 | Moderate |
| PCAR | 0.435 | 0.441 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare SBUX to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.