Consumer Cyclical / Restaurants

Starbucks Corporation (SBUX)

$95.51
-1.04%
$113.0B
Market Cap
75.7
P/E Ratio
1.01
Beta
2.50%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 5/9Altman Z 2.7 Gray ZoneBeneish M -2.77 CleanROIC−WACC +1.2%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

SBUX trades at 75.7x earnings — a 116% premium to its sector average of 35.0x — without a dominant ROIC-WACC spread. Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 2.7. DCF fair value of $22 implies 78% downside based on model assumptions.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital allocation efficiency of the firm presents a stark contradiction between operational cash generation and reported equity returns. While the ROIC-WACC spread remains positive at 1.2%, indicating that operating assets generate value above the cost of capital, the DuPont decomposition reveals a leveraged distortion driving an anomalous negative ROE of -22.9%. This negative return is mechanically driven by an equity multiplier of -3.96x rather than deteriorating margins or turnover, suggesting complex balance sheet restructuring or buyback mechanics are suppressing book value despite healthy gross and net margins alongside robust profitability factor scores. Fundamental quality indicators remain mixed; the Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 signals moderate financial strength, while a Beneish M-Score of -2.77 strongly corroborates earnings integrity, yet an Altman Z-Score of 2.7 places the entity in the gray zone regarding bankruptcy risk relative to peers.

Valuation metrics suggest significant market divergence from intrinsic value models and historical norms. Trading at a P/E ratio of 75.3x versus a sector average of 57.0x, the stock commands a substantial premium that appears misaligned with its DCF-derived fair value of $22, which implies -75.7% downside from current levels based on an assumed 18.1% ten-year free cash flow growth rate. This discrepancy indicates the market is pricing in aggressive future expansion or intangible brand moats not fully captured by standard discounted cash flow assumptions, creating a wide gap between consensus expectations and model-based valuations.

Risk-adjusted performance data highlights substantial underperformance relative to factor benchmarks over the trailing period. The Fama-French alpha of -22.05% annually demonstrates that recent returns have failed to compensate for systematic risk exposure, even as the Profitability Factor (RMW) remains robust at 0.468 and value tilt is neutral. Compounding this technical weakness with insider activity showing $460,974 in net selling over the last ninety days, the current price structure appears detached from both fundamental cash flow realities and recent insider sentiment, leaving investors to weigh whether high valuation multiples are justified by future growth or represent a significant overhang of downside risk.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive
Market Price
$95.51
Fair Value
$21
Implied Upside
-77.8%
$21IMPLIED FAIR VALUEOVERVALUEDOVERUNDER
Growth Rate (Y1–5)3%
-10%20%50%
Discount Rate (WACC)9.9%
5%12.5%20%

5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.

Reverse DCFMarket-Implied
19.2%annual FCF growth priced in at $95.51

The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 3% YoY revenue.

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →7.9%9.9%11.9%
2%$28$18$13
3%$34$22$14
4%$44$26$17

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $95.51.

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=9.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $22 (-77.9%). Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

75.7x
SBUX P/E
35.0x
Sector Avg
56.3x
5Y Avg P/E
+116%
vs Sector

Currently trading 43% above its 5-year average P/E of 56.3x.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Technical Setup

AI Generated

Starbucks stock is currently trading above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, indicating a strong uptrend with continued bullish momentum as supported by the elevated RSI reading over 68. The short-term average has pulled well ahead of the long-term one, suggesting that recent buying pressure is outpacing longer-term trends.

RSI (14)
SMA 50
SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

5/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
2.7
Altman Z-Score
Grey Zone — between 1.8 and 3.0 thresholds. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.77
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

22.8%
Gross Margin
5.0%
Net Margin
11.1%
ROIC
9.9%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: +1.2%— Positive spread.
+2.8%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-50.6%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
2.4B
Free Cash Flow
113%
FCF Payout Ratio

⚠️ Dividend consumes >80% of FCF — sustainability risk.

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

5.0%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
1.16x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
-3.96x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
-22.9%
Return on Equity
Balanced ROE composition across margins, turnover, and leverage.

Balance Sheet Health

-4.96x
Debt / Equity
0.72x
Current Ratio
5.6x
Interest Coverage
2.4x
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.01%
FCF Yield
4.8B
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
$-460,974
Net Selling
0
Buy Transactions
3
Sale Transactions
2026-03-25SIEVERT G MICHAELGrant3,667 shares
2026-03-25FORD BETH EGrant3,937 shares
2026-03-25MOHAN NEALGrant3,667 shares
2026-03-25CAMPION ANDREWGrant4,099 shares
2026-03-25MOYO DAMBISA FGrant2,265 shares

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✗ Miss
Est: $0.48
Act: $0.41
-15.2%
Q3
✗ Miss
Est: $0.65
Act: $0.50
-22.5%
Q2
✗ Miss
Est: $0.56
Act: $0.52
-6.5%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $0.59
Act: $0.56
-4.6%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Dividend History

$0.6200
Latest Dividend
$2.45
2025 Total
+5.6%
YoY Growth
9 yrs
Consecutive Increases
Annual Dividends per Share
$0.45
2016
$1.05
2017
$1.32
2018
$1.49
2019
$1.68
2020
$1.84
2021
$2.00
2022
$2.16
2023
$2.32
2024
$2.45
2025
$1.24
2026
DateAmountChange
2026-05-15$0.62000.0%
2026-02-13$0.62000.0%
2025-11-14$0.6200+1.6%
2025-08-15$0.61000.0%
2025-05-16$0.61000.0%
2025-02-14$0.61000.0%
2024-11-15$0.6100+7.0%
2024-08-16$0.57000.0%
2024-05-16$0.57000.0%
2024-02-08$0.57000.0%
2023-11-09$0.5700+7.5%
2023-08-10$0.53000.0%
Stock Splits
2015-04-09: 2:12005-10-24: 2:12001-04-30: 2:11999-03-22: 2:11995-12-04: 2:11993-09-30: 2:1

Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.

Risk Profile

33.9%
Annual Volatility
0.39
Sharpe (1Y)
-20.0%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure

Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.

1.17
Market β
Mkt-RF
+0.422
Size (SMB)
Small-cap tilt
+0.069
Value (HML)
Neutral
+0.468
Profit (RMW)
Robust
+1.046
Invest (CMA)
Conservative
Alpha (annual): -22.05%
R²: 48.6%of variance explained by 5 factors

Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.

Fundamentals

32.7
Forward P/E
1.70
PEG Ratio
-13.35
Price/Book
8M
Avg Volume
$108.88
52W High
$77.99
52W Low
57%
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$15.6B
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding SBUX
0.23%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$6.8T
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XLY or VCR, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell SBUX shares regardless of Starbucks Corporation's individual fundamentals. We estimate $15.6B of passive capital is structurally linked to SBUX through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in Starbucks Corporation to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

SBUX Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
SBUXEpicenterVTIETFVOOETFIVVETFAMZNLow RiskAMZNLow RiskTSLALow RiskTSLALow RiskJNJLow Risk
SBUX Price Drop (%)0

If Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies AMAZON.COM INC (AMZN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with SBUX. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 31 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

SBUX Ownership Dynamics

Passive funds hold 1 in every 7 SBUX shares, reducing daily market volatility.

Ticker
SBUX
Total Shares
1.1B
ETF Lock-Up
14.7%
Display Mode
Total Float Impact
14.7%Locked Float

Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 2.7% of the State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLY) and 1.8% of the VCR (VCR). Across 31 tracked ETFs, approximately 168M shares (14.7% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.

Float lock-up computed from 31 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

SBUX Institutional Volume Profile

252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.

TICKER
SBUX
PRICE
$95.51
FLOOR (POC)
$84.12
STRENGTH
Medium
$78$79$81$839%$84POC 12%$869%$876%$896%$918%$929%$94$957%$95.51$97$99$100$102$103$105$106$108
Focus Zone
Point of Control (POC) Support (below price) Resistance (above price) Current Price

The highest-volume price zone for Starbucks Corporation over the past year sits near $84.12 (12% of 252-day volume). The current price of $95.51 trades 13.5% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target.

Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.

SBUX Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does Starbucks Corporation convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$2.4B
EBITDA
$4.8B
FCF Conversion
51%
Reinvestment Rate
49%
51% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
11.1%
ROIC − WACC Spread
1.2%

Starbucks Corporation converts 51% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 1.2% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-14103$105.95$10,912.85
2026-05-116,715$104.93$704,604.95
2026-05-082,124$104.26$221,448.24
2026-05-073,820$106.44$406,600.8
2026-05-0520$104.97$2,099.4
2026-05-041,904$105.90$201,633.6
2026-04-3017,143$105.50$1.8M
2026-04-291,365$97.28$132,787.2
2026-04-281,916$97.89$187,557.24
2026-04-275$98.67$493.35
2026-04-241,966$99.54$195,695.64
2026-04-233,308$99.52$329,212.16
2026-04-21111$98.95$10,983.45
2026-04-163$98.34$295.02
2026-04-159$98.47$886.23
2026-04-14491$97.48$47,862.68
2026-04-131,000$96.60$96,600
2026-04-10960$96.92$93,043.2
2026-04-0983$97.21$8,068.43
2026-04-085,324$95.21$506,898.04
2026-04-07200$94.78$18,956
2026-04-0693,976$90.37$8.5M
2026-04-01389$89.59$34,850.51
2026-03-3110,392$86.72$901,194.24
2026-03-2752$91.22$4,743.44
2026-03-2628,789$92.70$2.7M
2026-03-25114$91.98$10,485.72
2026-03-2412,050$93.83$1.1M
2026-03-2312,050$92.55$1.1M
2026-03-161,000$99.15$99,150

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Price Correlations

Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.

Peer252-Day (1Y)126-Day (6M)Direction
WTGXXNaNNaN
SWK0.4850.484Moderate
HLT0.4760.438Moderate
MGM0.4670.475Moderate
MAR0.4640.418Moderate
HST0.4570.389Moderate
IP0.4490.402Moderate
TGT0.4430.413Moderate
DD0.4370.388Moderate
PCAR0.4350.441Moderate

Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.

Compare SBUX to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.