United Rentals, Inc. (URI)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 25.4x earnings — a 43% discount to the sector average of 44.7x — URI is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 4/9, Altman Z 3.1.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of URI present a distinct dichotomy between high profitability and marginally negative capital efficiency. While the DuPont decomposition reveals that ROE is driven primarily by robust net margins at 15.5% rather than asset turnover or leverage, the ROIC-WACC spread of -0.3% indicates the company fails to generate returns exceeding its cost of capital on invested assets. This inefficiency is underscored by a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 and an Altman Z-Score of 3.1, suggesting moderate financial distress risk despite a low Beneish M-Score (-2.84) that points to minimal earnings manipulation. The revenue growth trajectory of 4.9% YoY appears modest relative to the implied ten-year free cash flow growth rate of 41.2%, creating a disconnect between current top-line performance and long-term earnings power expectations embedded in valuation models.
Valuation metrics suggest the market is pricing for significant future acceleration, as the current P/E of 19.0x sits at an implied premium given the subdued historical revenue expansion. The gap between realized profitability and projected cash flow growth implies that investors are anticipating a structural shift toward higher operational leverage or margin expansion to justify the multiple. However, this optimism contrasts sharply with the negative ROIC-WACC spread, which theoretically limits sustainable value creation unless asset base utilization improves significantly. The presence of a strong Value Factor tilt (0.561) alongside robust profitability characteristics suggests the stock may be undervalued relative to growth peers but carries inherent risks associated with its capital allocation history.
Risk assessment highlights concerning insider dynamics, evidenced by $3.1 million in net selling over the past 90 days, which often precedes downside pressure or reflects a lack of confidence from management regarding near-term prospects. Despite this, the stock exhibits a positive Fama-French Alpha of 7.36% annually and maintains profitability factor exposure (RMW: 0.148), indicating it has historically outperformed on risk-adjusted returns driven by high-quality earnings. The combination of insider disposition activity with strong alpha generation creates an ambiguous risk-reward profile where fundamental quality metrics diverge from recent ownership behavior, requiring careful scrutiny of whether the negative capital spread is a cyclical anomaly or a structural constraint.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 22% below its 5-year average P/E of 25.5x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | $1.9700 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-11 | $1.9700 | +10.1% |
| 2025-11-12 | $1.7900 | 0.0% |
| 2025-08-13 | $1.7900 | 0.0% |
| 2025-05-14 | $1.7900 | 0.0% |
| 2025-02-12 | $1.7900 | +9.8% |
| 2024-11-13 | $1.6300 | 0.0% |
| 2024-08-14 | $1.6300 | 0.0% |
| 2024-05-07 | $1.6300 | 0.0% |
| 2024-02-13 | $1.6300 | +10.1% |
| 2023-11-07 | $1.4800 | 0.0% |
| 2023-08-08 | $1.4800 | 0.0% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XLI or VOE, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell URI shares regardless of United Rentals, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $8.0B of passive capital is structurally linked to URI through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in United Rentals, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If United Rentals, Inc. (URI) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies CATERPILLAR INC (CAT) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with URI. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 28 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
URI Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 7 URI shares, reducing daily market volatility.
United Rentals, Inc. (URI) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 1.1% of the State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLI) and 1.1% of the VOE (VOE). Across 28 tracked ETFs, approximately 9M shares (14.4% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest URI Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 28 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
URI Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for United Rentals, Inc. over the past year sits near $804.95 (14% of 252-day volume). The current price of $994.82 trades 23.6% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (14% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
URI Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does United Rentals, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
United Rentals, Inc. converts 9% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a low conversion rate suggesting heavy reinvestment. This may indicate a growth phase (building capacity) or structural capital intensity. The 91% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-0.5%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 5 | $935.26 | $4,676.3 |
| 2026-05-13 | 616 | $955.76 | $588,748.16 |
| 2026-05-05 | 1,506 | $925.21 | $1.4M |
| 2026-05-04 | 11,090 | $949.23 | $10.5M |
| 2026-05-01 | 12,352 | $959.84 | $11.9M |
| 2026-04-30 | 68 | $952.13 | $64,744.84 |
| 2026-04-29 | 130 | $962.72 | $125,153.6 |
| 2026-04-28 | 5,390 | $959.85 | $5.2M |
| 2026-04-27 | 4,380 | $974.41 | $4.3M |
| 2026-04-24 | 103 | $986.78 | $101,638.34 |
| 2026-04-22 | 1,122 | $806.22 | $904,578.84 |
| 2026-04-14 | 48 | $779.53 | $37,417.44 |
| 2026-04-08 | 745 | $732.74 | $545,891.3 |
| 2026-04-06 | 8 | $732.09 | $5,856.72 |
| 2026-03-30 | 18,849 | $734.30 | $13.8M |
| 2026-03-26 | 282 | $747.59 | $210,820.38 |
| 2026-03-25 | 6 | $746.84 | $4,481.04 |
| 2026-03-23 | 8,354 | $710.47 | $5.9M |
| 2026-03-18 | 744 | $745.02 | $554,294.88 |
| 2026-03-11 | 2,522 | $775.79 | $2.0M |
| 2026-02-19 | 3,415 | $880.18 | $3.0M |
| 2026-02-18 | 983 | $863.28 | $848,604.24 |
| 2026-02-17 | 16,982 | $869.57 | $14.8M |
| 2026-02-12 | 900 | $873.83 | $786,447 |
| 2026-02-10 | 1,000 | $876.52 | $876,520 |
| 2026-02-09 | 643 | $899.55 | $578,410.65 |
| 2026-01-22 | 1,175 | $940.09 | $1.1M |
| 2026-01-16 | 25 | $926.57 | $23,164.25 |
| 2026-01-15 | 224 | $917.34 | $205,484.16 |
| 2026-01-14 | 70 | $940.17 | $65,811.9 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| ALLE | 0.590 | 0.420 | Moderate |
| SWK | 0.547 | 0.488 | Moderate |
| ODFL | 0.546 | 0.536 | Moderate |
| BX | 0.525 | 0.374 | Moderate |
| OC | 0.522 | 0.473 | Moderate |
| BLDR | 0.520 | 0.498 | Moderate |
| MC | 0.518 | 0.447 | Moderate |
| BLD | 0.513 | 0.514 | Moderate |
| MAS | 0.511 | 0.463 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare URI to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.