Stock vs Stock Comparison

Chubb Limited vs Arch Capital Group Ltd.

ACGL wins the Tale of the Tape 7–2.

CB$312.75
ACGL$87.89

🏆 Tale of the Tape

27
CBACGL
17.2%Profitability (Net Margin)22.8%
11.0xValuation (P/E)6.9x
4.0%Efficiency (ROIC)5.1%
6/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
1.1Safety (Altman Z)1.3
7.0%Growth (Rev YoY)14.0%
0.66Risk (Sharpe 1Y)0.16
2.41xBalance Sheet (D/E)2.27x
FCF Yield17.06%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.718
252-Day Correlation
0.706
126-Day Correlation

Highly correlated — these stocks tend to move together. Limited diversification benefit.

Fundamentals

MetricCBACGL
Market Cap$120.9B$31.2B
P/E Ratio11.0x6.9x
Forward P/E10.7x9.0x
P/B1.64x1.34x
Dividend Yield1.31%
Beta0.440.33

Quantitative Metrics

MetricCBACGL
DCF Fair Value$453.32
DCF Upside+366.9%
Piotroski F6/95/9
Altman Z1.151.31
Beneish M
FCF Yield17.06%
Net Debt/EBITDA1.0x0.3x
ROIC4.0%5.1%
WACC7.6%7.7%
ROIC – WACC-3.6pp-2.6pp
Gross Margin
Net Margin17.2%22.8%
Rev Growth YoY7.0%14.0%
Sharpe (1Y)0.660.16
Max Drawdown 3Y-22.4%
FCF Payout Ratio1%

CB Price

Loading chart...

ACGL Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

CB found in:

KIE1.80%
XLF1.63%
USMV1.49%
VFH1.45%
VFMV0.90%
VFVA0.65%
QUS0.61%
MGV0.57%
VIG0.54%
SDY0.51%
VYM0.50%
VTV0.45%
SPYV0.42%
VONV0.37%
ESGV0.24%
VOO0.19%
SPY0.19%
VONE0.18%
SPLG0.17%
SPTM0.17%
VTI0.17%
ONEO0.16%
VT0.10%

ACGL found in:

KIE1.79%
ONEV0.96%
VOE0.57%
XLF0.47%
VFH0.41%
ONEO0.33%
VO0.32%
QUS0.21%
VFVA0.16%
VTV0.12%
SPYV0.12%
VONV0.10%
ESGV0.07%
SPLG0.05%
SPY0.05%
SPTM0.05%
VOO0.05%
VTI0.05%
VONE0.05%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

CB vs ACGL: Head-to-Head Analysis

Chubb Limited (CB) and Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) represent two companies in the Financial Services sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, ACGL leads 7–2 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, CB generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 4.0% compared to ACGL's 5.1%. This suggests ACGL is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between CB and ACGL is 0.718, indicating these stocks move closely together, offering limited diversification benefit in a portfolio context.

CB appears in 23 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while ACGL appears in 19 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, CB or ACGL?

Our quantitative analysis compares CB and ACGL across nine fundamental dimensions. ACGL wins the Tale of the Tape 7–2. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are CB and ACGL correlated?

The 252-day correlation between CB and ACGL is 0.718. They are highly correlated, meaning they tend to move together.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.