eBay Inc. (EBAY)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicEBAY trades at 25.2x earnings, roughly in line with its sector average of 35.0x. Financial health is average: Piotroski 4/9, Altman Z 6.3. DCF fair value of $4 implies 96% downside based on model assumptions. Beneish M-Score of -2.10 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation efficiency of eBay Inc. is characterized by a robust ROIC-WACC spread of 3.5%, indicating value creation above the cost of equity, yet this strength coexists with significant operational volatility signaled by a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 and a Beneish M-Score of -2.10 that suggests potential earnings management concerns despite an Altman Z-Score of 6.2 implying low bankruptcy risk. The DuPont decomposition reveals that the impressive 44.0% ROE is driven primarily by high leverage (Equity Multiplier at 3.82x) and substantial net margins (18.3%) rather than asset turnover, which remains modest at 0.63x; while gross margins of 71.5% reflect strong pricing power in a cyclical sector, the reliance on financial leverage amplifies both returns and downside exposure if earnings compress.
Valuation metrics present a stark divergence between market pricing and intrinsic models, with the current P/E ratio of 22.1x trading at less than half the sector average of 57.0x, suggesting the stock is priced for significantly lower growth expectations than peers despite an 8.0% revenue expansion. However, the DCF analysis implies a substantial discount to fair value estimates, with implied upside calculated at -95.3%, indicating that current market prices may already account for conservative long-term cash flow assumptions or that the model inputs assume limited future scalability relative to the historical FCF growth rate of 36.2%. This disconnect highlights a scenario where the market has priced in stagnation, potentially creating an asymmetric opportunity if fundamental drivers improve, though the low valuation multiple also reflects deep-seated skepticism about sustaining current profitability levels.
Risk factor analysis reveals conflicting signals regarding future performance: while the stock exhibits strong value characteristics with positive Profitability Factor alpha (0.127) and historically high Fama-French annualized alpha of 28.30%, it carries a negative Value tilt (-0.122), suggesting underperformance relative to pure value benchmarks. Compounding these fundamental uncertainties is notable insider activity, with $15.4 million in net selling over the last ninety days, which often precedes downward revisions or signals management's lack of confidence in near-term execution. The convergence of low F-Score fundamentals, aggressive leverage-dependent returns, and significant insider outflows creates a complex risk-reward profile where potential mean reversion is offset by tangible governance and operational risks that could further compress margins or increase capital costs.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 8% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 9.9% | 11.9% | 13.9% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $5 | $4 | $3 |
| 3% | $6 | $4 | $3 |
| 4% | $7 | $5 | $4 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $108.88.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=11.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $4 (-95.5%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 67% below its 5-year average P/E of 68.8x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedeBay Inc. is currently trading at $114.24 within the consumer cyclical sector, a positioning that inherently ties its performance to broader discretionary spending trends rather than defensive sheltering during economic uncertainty. The present price level serves as a focal point for assessing whether recent upward or downward movements represent a sustainable structural shift in valuation or merely short-term noise driven by transient market sentiment. Without explicit data on drawdown magnitude, volatility spikes, or fundamental earnings revisions, the resilience of this momentum remains ambiguous; it could indicate a robust recovery phase if supported by improving consumer confidence metrics, yet it is equally susceptible to rapid correction should macroeconomic headwinds intensify. The interplay between current pricing and historical support or resistance zones will ultimately dictate whether observed trends are fragile or entrenched. In the absence of concrete volatility measures or fundamental catalysts in this snapshot, any apparent strength at $114.24 lacks confirmed durability against potential sector-wide rotations away from growth-oriented consumer names. Market participants must weigh the possibility that current levels reflect a temporary consolidation following prior corrections versus a genuine inflection point supported by underlying business fundamentals. The trajectory of such cyclical equities often hinges on external economic indicators, meaning technical patterns alone may prove insufficient to predict future stability without corroborating data regarding revenue growth or margin expansion.
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-29 | $0.3100 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-06 | $0.3100 | +6.9% |
| 2025-11-28 | $0.2900 | 0.0% |
| 2025-08-29 | $0.2900 | 0.0% |
| 2025-05-30 | $0.2900 | 0.0% |
| 2025-03-14 | $0.2900 | +7.4% |
| 2024-11-29 | $0.2700 | 0.0% |
| 2024-08-30 | $0.2700 | 0.0% |
| 2024-05-31 | $0.2700 | 0.0% |
| 2024-03-08 | $0.2700 | +8.0% |
| 2023-11-30 | $0.2500 | 0.0% |
| 2023-08-31 | $0.2500 | 0.0% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XRT or XLY, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell EBAY shares regardless of eBay Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $6.5B of passive capital is structurally linked to EBAY through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in eBay Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If eBay Inc. (EBAY) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies AMAZON.COM INC (AMZN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with EBAY. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 34 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
EBAY Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 7 EBAY shares, reducing daily market volatility.
eBay Inc. (EBAY) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 1.8% of the XRT (XRT) and 1.2% of the State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLY). Across 34 tracked ETFs, approximately 66M shares (14.8% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest EBAY Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 34 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
EBAY Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for eBay Inc. over the past year sits near $89.81 (15% of 252-day volume). The current price of $108.88 trades 21.2% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (15% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
EBAY Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does eBay Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
eBay Inc. converts 48% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The 52% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 3.7% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-06 | 43,213 | $105.26 | $4.5M |
| 2026-05-04 | 14,565 | $104.07 | $1.5M |
| 2026-04-30 | 2 | $103.79 | $207.58 |
| 2026-04-28 | 716 | $100.29 | $71,807.64 |
| 2026-04-27 | 898 | $97.94 | $87,950.12 |
| 2026-04-16 | 84,691 | $100.01 | $8.5M |
| 2026-04-15 | 6 | $100.40 | $602.4 |
| 2026-04-14 | 1,315 | $98.15 | $129,067.25 |
| 2026-04-10 | 1 | $95.58 | $95.58 |
| 2026-04-08 | 10 | $96.01 | $960.1 |
| 2026-04-07 | 89 | $97.71 | $8,696.19 |
| 2026-04-06 | 13,541 | $94.14 | $1.3M |
| 2026-03-31 | 140 | $88.01 | $12,321.4 |
| 2026-03-27 | 580 | $89.43 | $51,869.4 |
| 2026-03-25 | 45 | $89.10 | $4,009.5 |
| 2026-03-23 | 54 | $88.98 | $4,804.92 |
| 2026-03-20 | 82,286 | $90.74 | $7.5M |
| 2026-03-13 | 43,381 | $90.00 | $3.9M |
| 2026-03-06 | 1,732 | $93.04 | $161,145.28 |
| 2026-03-02 | 336 | $90.86 | $30,528.96 |
| 2026-02-24 | 22 | $84.31 | $1,854.82 |
| 2026-02-20 | 122 | $84.75 | $10,339.5 |
| 2026-02-17 | 37,554 | $82.38 | $3.1M |
| 2026-02-13 | 36,549 | $79.41 | $2.9M |
| 2026-02-12 | 121 | $82.88 | $10,028.48 |
| 2026-02-09 | 50 | $86.55 | $4,327.5 |
| 2026-02-04 | 189 | $92.38 | $17,459.82 |
| 2026-01-30 | 180 | $94.41 | $16,993.8 |
| 2026-01-23 | 10,146 | $93.88 | $952,506.48 |
| 2026-01-20 | 37 | $93.03 | $3,442.11 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| CVNA | 0.419 | 0.456 | Moderate |
| META | 0.407 | 0.440 | Moderate |
| XYL | 0.400 | 0.237 | Moderate |
| FMC | 0.392 | 0.557 | Moderate |
| ALNY | 0.338 | 0.231 | Moderate |
| CMG | 0.326 | 0.516 | Moderate |
| RBLX | 0.313 | 0.427 | Moderate |
| ETSY | 0.297 | 0.522 | Low correlation |
| ICE | 0.286 | 0.374 | Low correlation |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare EBAY to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.