Dollar Tree, Inc. (DLTR)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 18.7x earnings — a 43% discount to the sector average of 32.6x — DLTR is in the lower valuation range. Financial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 8/9, Altman Z 3.5 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold). DCF fair value of $204 implies 100% upside from current prices based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe company demonstrates robust fundamental quality, characterized by a 13.2% ROIC that generates a +4.6% spread over the WACC of 8.6%, indicating efficient capital deployment relative to cost of equity. The exceptional 34.2% DuPont-decomposed ROE is driven primarily by high asset turnover at 1.44x rather than leverage, which sits at a moderate 3.59x multiplier despite contributing significantly through the equity base. Financial stability is further underscored by an Altman Z-Score of 3.6 and a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9, while revenue expands at a solid 10.4% annualized rate supported by healthy gross margins of 36.4%.
Valuation metrics reveal a significant divergence between current pricing and intrinsic value models; the stock trades at an 18.3x P/E, substantially below its historical trajectory and the sector average of 34.4x. Discounted cash flow analysis suggests a fair value of $214, implying potential upside of 95.3% based on assumed long-term free cash flow growth rates of approximately 1.8% over the next decade. This wide gap between market price and model-derived fair value indicates that current pricing may not fully reflect the company's projected earnings power or operational efficiency gains relative to peer averages.
Risk assessment is complicated by conflicting signals in ownership structure, as insider activity over the last ninety days shows net selling totaling $22,956, which contrasts with the strong fundamentals and low valuation multiples. While the Piotroski score suggests improving financial health, the combination of modest implied growth assumptions and recent executive disposition requires scrutiny regarding future capital allocation or confidence levels in near-term execution.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 10% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6.9% | 8.9% | 10.9% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $259 | $178 | $133 |
| 3% | $320 | $204 | $148 |
| 4% | $423 | $241 | $166 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $109.39.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=8.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $204 (+99.9%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 11% below its 5-year average P/E of 18.8x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedDollar Tree, Inc. is currently trading at $93.48 within the Consumer Defensive sector. Without specific moving average data provided in this snapshot, a definitive assessment of whether the price sits above or below its key trend lines cannot be made solely on these figures; however, the current valuation point serves as the baseline for evaluating immediate momentum shifts. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) is not included in the available data, which limits the ability to gauge short-term overbought or oversold conditions at this precise moment. Consequently, any analysis of trend strength relies entirely on the static price level rather than dynamic oscillator readings that would clarify market sentiment direction. In a broader technical context, the absence of comparative moving average positions means one cannot determine if recent price action reflects an established uptrend, downtrend, or consolidation phase based strictly on this information set. The $93.48 figure represents the current market consensus value but does not inherently indicate future trajectory without historical context regarding its relationship to longer-term averages. Analysts would typically cross-reference this specific price point against 50-day and 200-day moving averages to identify potential support or resistance zones, though such data remains unavailable here. Similarly, missing RSI metrics prevent a clear conclusion on whether short-term momentum is accelerating or decelerating relative to recent trading ranges. Ultimately, the technical picture for Dollar Tree at this specific instant requires additional inputs regarding historical price relationships and oscillator values to form a complete narrative about trend
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XRT or XLP, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell DLTR shares regardless of Dollar Tree, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $2.8B of passive capital is structurally linked to DLTR through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Dollar Tree, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Dollar Tree, Inc. (DLTR) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Walmart Inc. (WMT) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with DLTR. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 27 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
DLTR Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 7 DLTR shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Dollar Tree, Inc. (DLTR) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 1.2% of the XRT (XRT) and 1.2% of the State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Across 27 tracked ETFs, approximately 28M shares (14.7% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest DLTR Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 27 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
DLTR Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Dollar Tree, Inc. over the past year sits near $100.57 (12% of 252-day volume). The current price of $109.39 trades 8.8% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
DLTR Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Dollar Tree, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Dollar Tree, Inc. converts 59% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 4.4% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 6 | $86.80 | $520.8 |
| 2026-05-12 | 2 | $90.02 | $180.04 |
| 2026-05-07 | 5 | $96.51 | $482.55 |
| 2026-05-06 | 25,543 | $93.69 | $2.4M |
| 2026-05-05 | 18,620 | $94.05 | $1.8M |
| 2026-05-04 | 3 | $94.67 | $284.01 |
| 2026-04-29 | 5 | $98.22 | $491.1 |
| 2026-04-22 | 5 | $103.83 | $519.15 |
| 2026-04-20 | 787 | $105.93 | $83,366.91 |
| 2026-04-16 | 295 | $101.33 | $29,892.35 |
| 2026-04-15 | 22,021 | $100.67 | $2.2M |
| 2026-04-14 | 5,947 | $102.13 | $607,367.11 |
| 2026-04-13 | 8,473 | $99.55 | $843,487.15 |
| 2026-04-10 | 9,823 | $102.60 | $1.0M |
| 2026-04-08 | 428 | $106.42 | $45,547.76 |
| 2026-04-07 | 802 | $111.09 | $89,094.18 |
| 2026-03-31 | 72,970 | $105.74 | $7.7M |
| 2026-03-27 | 19 | $105.99 | $2,013.81 |
| 2026-03-26 | 20 | $106.64 | $2,132.8 |
| 2026-03-25 | 19 | $106.53 | $2,024.07 |
| 2026-03-24 | 13,283 | $108.27 | $1.4M |
| 2026-03-20 | 1 | $105.56 | $105.56 |
| 2026-03-16 | 4,615 | $107.46 | $495,927.9 |
| 2026-03-10 | 111 | $115.85 | $12,859.35 |
| 2026-03-06 | 39 | $115.91 | $4,520.49 |
| 2026-03-04 | 31 | $118.41 | $3,670.71 |
| 2026-02-27 | 40,690 | $126.95 | $5.2M |
| 2026-02-26 | 3 | $127.70 | $383.1 |
| 2026-02-19 | 5 | $132.54 | $662.7 |
| 2026-02-17 | 1,400 | $126.06 | $176,484 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| DG | 0.546 | 0.583 | Moderate |
| HD | 0.385 | 0.432 | Moderate |
| TGT | 0.384 | 0.469 | Moderate |
| LOW | 0.381 | 0.451 | Moderate |
| PKG | 0.378 | 0.442 | Moderate |
| AVY | 0.374 | 0.403 | Moderate |
| TSCO | 0.361 | 0.297 | Moderate |
| WSM | 0.354 | 0.443 | Moderate |
| ROST | 0.350 | 0.423 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare DLTR to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.