TTD (TTD)

$21.10
-9.13%
$10.1B
Market Cap
24.5
P/E Ratio
1.10
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 6/9Altman Z 2.6 Gray ZoneBeneish M -2.98 CleanROIC−WACC +4.4%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 2.6. DCF fair value of $38 implies 80% upside from current prices based on model assumptions.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The underlying economics demonstrate a robust capital allocation framework, evidenced by an ROIC of 16.1% significantly exceeding the WACC of 11.9%, yielding a positive spread of +4.3%. This profitability is primarily margin-driven rather than leverage-dependent; while equity multipliers sit at 2.48x, the DuPont decomposition reveals that high net margins (15.3%) and substantial gross margins (78.6%) are the primary engines supporting a 17.8% ROE, with asset turnover remaining modest at 0.47x. Financial integrity metrics further corroborate this quality profile: a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 indicates strong fundamental stability, an Altman Z-Score of 2.8 suggests a safe distance from insolvency thresholds, and a Beneish M-Score of -2.98 points to low likelihoods of earnings manipulation. These fundamentals are underpinned by revenue growth accelerating at 18.5% year-over-year, signaling sustained demand dynamics within the business model.

Valuation metrics present a notable divergence between current pricing and intrinsic value estimates derived from discounted cash flow analysis. The stock trades at a P/E multiple of 22.3x, which requires comparison against historical ranges and sector peers to determine relative positioning, though the DCF model implies a fair value of $38 with an upside potential of 65.6%. This significant gap suggests that market pricing may not fully incorporate long-term free cash flow growth assumptions embedded in the ten-year projection of 5.1%. The substantial disparity between current levels and the calculated fair value indicates that either the market is discounting future cash flows more aggressively than the model assumes, or it anticipates a deterioration in margin expansion capabilities over time.

Insider activity provides a contrasting signal to public sentiment, with $143 million in net buying recorded over the past 90 days. This aggressive accumulation by insiders often precedes positive re-ratings of fundamental quality or suggests confidence in near-term catalysts not yet fully priced into the security. While the Piotroski score and insider flow point toward an improving risk-reward profile, the wide valuation gap necessitates a careful assessment of whether the implied growth rate is sustainable given the current multiple compression relative to historical norms.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive
Market Price
$21.10
Fair Value
$38
Implied Upside
+79.8%
$38IMPLIED FAIR VALUEUNDERVALUEDOVERUNDER
Growth Rate (Y1–5)20%
-10%20%50%
Discount Rate (WACC)11.8%
5%12.5%20%

5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.

Reverse DCFMarket-Implied
3.9%annual FCF growth priced in at $21.10

The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 18% YoY revenue.

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →9.8%11.8%13.8%
2%$45$35$29
3%$50$38$31
4%$57$42$33

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $21.10.

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=11.8%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $38 (+79.6%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

6/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
2.6
Altman Z-Score
Grey Zone — between 1.8 and 3.0 thresholds. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.98
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

78.6%
Gross Margin
15.3%
Net Margin
16.1%
ROIC
11.8%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: +4.4%— Positive spread.
+18.5%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+12.8%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
783.0M
Free Cash Flow

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

15.3%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.47x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
2.48x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
17.8%
Return on Equity
✅ ROE driven primarily by strong profit margins — a sign of pricing power.

Balance Sheet Health

1.48x
Debt / Equity
1.61x
Current Ratio
-0.4x
Net Debt / EBITDA
8.45%
FCF Yield
705.1M
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
+$143M
Net Buying
1
Buy Transactions
1
Sale Transactions
2026-03-05FALBERG KATHRYN E.Sold 2/8 qtrsSale$5M
2026-03-04GREEN JEFFREY TERRYSold 5/8 qtrsBuy$148M
2026-03-03DAVIS TAHNILGrant167,197 shares
2026-03-03GREEN JEFFREY TERRYSold 5/8 qtrsGrant398,089 shares
2026-03-03GRANT JAY RSold 4/8 qtrsGrant167,197 shares

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $0.25
Act: $0.33
+33.2%
Q3
✗ Miss
Est: $0.41
Act: $0.41
-0.9%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $0.44
Act: $0.45
+1.8%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $0.58
Act: $0.59
+1.7%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Risk Profile

67.8%
Annual Volatility
-1.13
Sharpe (1Y)
-0.37
Sharpe (3Y)
-85.6%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-85.6%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

10.0
Forward P/E
1.01
PEG Ratio
4.13
Price/Book
21M
Avg Volume
$91.45
52W High
$19.74
52W Low
2%
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$1.8B
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding TTD
0.04%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$4.2T
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XLC or VOX, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell TTD shares regardless of TTD's individual fundamentals. We estimate $1.8B of passive capital is structurally linked to TTD through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in TTD to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

TTD Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
TTDEpicenterVOOETFIVVETFSPYETFMETALow RiskGOOGLLow RiskMETALow RiskGOOGLow RiskGOOGLLow Risk
TTD Price Drop (%)0

If TTD (TTD) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Facebook Inc. Class A (META) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with TTD. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 24 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

TTD Ownership Dynamics

Passive funds hold 1 in every 5 TTD shares, reducing daily market volatility.

Ticker
TTD
Total Shares
427M
ETF Lock-Up
18.6%
Display Mode
Total Float Impact
18.6%Locked Float

TTD (TTD) exerts notable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 2.5% of the State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLC) and 0.6% of the VOX (VOX). Across 26 tracked ETFs, approximately 79M shares (18.6% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.

Float lock-up computed from 26 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

TTD Institutional Volume Profile

252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.

TICKER
TTD
PRICE
$21.10
FLOOR (POC)
$21.53
STRENGTH
High
$22POC 20%$21.10$2515%$296%$32$367%$397%$43$477%$506%$5410%$57$61$65$68$72$75$79$82$86$90
Focus Zone
Point of Control (POC) Support (below price) Resistance (above price) Current Price

The highest-volume price zone for TTD over the past year sits near $21.53 (20% of 252-day volume). The current price of $21.10 sits 2.0% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level. The highly concentrated volume profile (20% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.

Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.

TTD Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does TTD convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$783M
EBITDA
$705M
FCF Conversion
111%
Reinvestment Rate
-11%
111% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
16.1%
ROIC − WACC Spread
4.4%

TTD converts 111% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 4.4% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-12300$21.52$6,456
2026-05-11400$23.08$9,232
2026-05-042,802$24.24$67,920.48
2026-04-242,015$22.62$45,579.3
2026-04-23505$23.56$11,897.8
2026-04-20505$22.47$11,347.35
2026-04-176,570$22.76$149,533.2
2026-04-153$21.02$63.06
2026-04-06969$22.05$21,366.45
2026-03-302,660$21.28$56,604.8
2026-03-26234$21.97$5,140.98
2026-03-25109,541$22.34$2.4M
2026-03-231,700$24.11$40,987
2026-03-16200$27.34$5,468
2026-03-06771$29.79$22,968.09
2026-03-05771$25.17$19,406.07
2026-03-048,143$25.00$203,575
2026-03-039,581$24.32$233,009.92
2026-03-0260,707$23.82$1.4M
2026-02-2718,653$23.95$446,739.35
2026-02-232,700$25.10$67,770
2026-02-094,455$27.04$120,463.2
2026-02-0525$27.27$681.75
2026-02-03600$29.75$17,850
2026-02-02200$30.33$6,066
2026-01-29200$31.87$6,374
2026-01-227,559$35.33$267,059.47
2026-01-217$34.15$239.05
2026-01-16100$36.23$3,623
2026-01-15219$37.13$8,131.47

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Price Correlations

Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.

Peer252-Day (1Y)126-Day (6M)Direction
WTGXXNaNNaN
TOST0.4800.484Moderate
PYPL0.4090.496Moderate
XYZ0.3550.407Moderate
CRM0.3490.432Moderate
SNOW0.3470.320Moderate
LAMR0.3450.140Moderate
RPD0.3440.289Moderate
TTWO0.3350.352Moderate
MCHP0.3290.102Moderate

Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.

Compare TTD to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.