Stock vs Stock Comparison

Carpenter Technology Corporation vs American Airlines Group Inc.

CRS wins the Tale of the Tape 7–2.

CRS$487.05
AAL$13.57

🏆 Tale of the Tape

72
CRSAAL
13.1%Profitability (Net Margin)0.2%
49.3xValuation (P/E)47.2x
14.0%Efficiency (ROIC)4.0%
7/9Health (Piotroski F)4/9
10.6Safety (Altman Z)0.7
4.3%Growth (Rev YoY)0.8%
2.11Risk (Sharpe 1Y)0.17
0.85xBalance Sheet (D/E)-17.57x
1.30%FCF Yield-5.62%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.343
252-Day Correlation
0.415
126-Day Correlation

Moderately correlated — some diversification benefit from holding both.

Fundamentals

MetricCRSAAL
Market Cap$23.3B$9.7B
P/E Ratio49.3x47.2x
Forward P/E37.1x6.6x
P/B11.27x-2.38x
Dividend Yield0.17%
Beta1.241.28

Quantitative Metrics

MetricCRSAAL
DCF Fair Value$124.85
DCF Upside-71.9%
Piotroski F7/94/9
Altman Z10.590.66
Beneish M-2.65-2.55
FCF Yield1.30%-5.62%
Net Debt/EBITDA0.6x6.0x
ROIC14.0%4.0%
WACC12.2%6.0%
ROIC – WACC1.8pp-2.0pp
Gross Margin26.7%19.2%
Net Margin13.1%0.2%
Rev Growth YoY4.3%0.8%
Sharpe (1Y)2.110.17
Max Drawdown 3Y-28.7%
FCF Payout Ratio14%

CRS Price

Loading chart...

AAL Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

CRS found in:

XAR3.39%
MDYG1.23%
SPMD0.64%
MDY0.63%
VBK0.60%
VIS0.30%
VB0.26%
VXF0.26%
ONEO0.22%
VFMO0.22%
VONV0.05%
SPTM0.03%
EWX0.03%
VTI0.03%
VONE0.03%
VONG0.01%

AAL found in:

XTN2.80%
MDYV0.54%
VGK0.34%
SPMD0.26%
MDY0.26%
VFVA0.19%
SPDW0.19%
VBR0.18%
VEA0.17%
CWI0.17%
VEU0.13%
VXUS0.12%
VIS0.11%
VB0.10%
VXF0.09%
VT0.05%
ONEO0.04%
SPTM0.01%
VONG0.00%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

CRS vs AAL: Head-to-Head Analysis

Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) and American Airlines Group Inc. (AAL) represent two companies in the Industrials sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, CRS leads 7–2 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, CRS generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 14.0% compared to AAL's 4.0%. This suggests CRS is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between CRS and AAL is 0.343, indicating moderate co-movement, with some diversification value from holding both in a portfolio context.

CRS appears in 16 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while AAL appears in 19 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, CRS or AAL?

Our quantitative analysis compares CRS and AAL across nine fundamental dimensions. CRS wins the Tale of the Tape 7–2. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are CRS and AAL correlated?

The 252-day correlation between CRS and AAL is 0.343. They show moderate correlation — partially diversifying.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.