Stock vs Stock Comparison

Vertiv Holdings Co vs Arcosa, Inc.

VRT wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3.

VRT$331.44
ACA

🏆 Tale of the Tape

63
VRTACA
13.0%Profitability (Net Margin)7.2%
79.3xValuation (P/E)28.3x
18.5%Efficiency (ROIC)6.2%
5/9Health (Piotroski F)8/9
9.9Safety (Altman Z)
27.7%Growth (Rev YoY)12.2%
2.66Risk (Sharpe 1Y)
2.10xBalance Sheet (D/E)0.89x
1.65%FCF Yield

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Fundamentals

MetricVRTACA
Market Cap$121.3B$5.9B
P/E Ratio79.3x28.3x
Forward P/E35.7x22.4x
P/B30.64x2.23x
Dividend Yield0.08%0.17%
Beta2.100.96

Quantitative Metrics

MetricVRTACA
DCF Fair Value$77.99$99.96
DCF Upside-74.0%
Piotroski F5/98/9
Altman Z9.88
Beneish M-2.44-2.48
FCF Yield1.65%
Net Debt/EBITDA0.5x2.3x
ROIC18.5%6.2%
WACC17.0%
ROIC – WACC1.6pp
Gross Margin36.3%22.4%
Net Margin13.0%7.2%
Rev Growth YoY27.7%12.2%
Sharpe (1Y)2.66
Max Drawdown 3Y-61.3%
FCF Payout Ratio4%6%

VRT Price

Loading chart...

ACA Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

VRT found in:

IWP4.22%
VOT2.96%
XLI2.33%
VIS1.69%
VO1.25%
IWR0.93%
VFMO0.91%
VONG0.40%
VUG0.38%
SPYG0.35%
ONEO0.32%
VOO0.20%
SPY0.19%
ESGV0.19%
VONE0.19%
VTI0.18%
SPTM0.18%
VT0.11%
VFQY0.09%
DGRW0.06%
QUS0.02%

ACA found in:

SLYG0.45%
SPSM0.35%
SLYV0.25%
VTWO0.18%
VFMO0.15%
VBR0.14%
VGK0.12%
VYMI0.10%
VIS0.09%
SPDW0.08%
VB0.08%
VXF0.08%
VEA0.06%
VSGX0.06%
CWI0.05%
VEU0.05%
VXUS0.04%
SPTM0.01%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

VRT vs ACA: Head-to-Head Analysis

Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT) and Arcosa, Inc. (ACA) represent two companies in the Industrials sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, VRT leads 6–3 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, VRT generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 18.5% compared to ACA's 6.2%. This suggests VRT is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

VRT appears in 21 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while ACA appears in 18 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, VRT or ACA?

Our quantitative analysis compares VRT and ACA across nine fundamental dimensions. VRT wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are VRT and ACA correlated?

Correlation data is not yet available for this pair. Check back after both stocks have sufficient trading history.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.