QQQ vs SCHD – ETF Overlap Analysis
Weighted holdings overlap using institutional min-weight methodology. Each shared stock contributes the lesser of its weight in either fund.
Only 5.1% overlap — these funds complement each other well for diversification.
QQQ and SCHD employ fundamentally divergent investment philosophies, targeting distinct market segments with minimal overlap of only 5.1%. QQQ concentrates heavily within the technology sector, evidenced by its top five holdings comprising major growth-oriented names like NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Tesla. In contrast, SCHD focuses on dividend yield and value characteristics across various industries, featuring leaders such as Lockheed Martin, ConocoPhillips, Verizon, Chevron, and Bristol Myers Squibb. This structural difference means the funds react differently to market cycles; QQQ is heavily weighted toward high-growth equities while SCHD emphasizes income generation through established companies with consistent payout histories. The cost structures of these vehicles also differ significantly relative to their asset bases. QQQ carries an expense ratio of 0.20% and manages a substantial $411.8 billion in assets, reflecting its status as one of the largest equity funds available. SCHD operates at a lower fee of 0.06% with approximately $78.4 billion under management, offering a more cost-efficient structure for investors seeking exposure to dividend-paying stocks. While both funds track their respective indices effectively, the disparity in fees suggests that long-term compounding costs will vary between the two strategies depending on holding periods and portfolio sizes. Investors must weigh these operational differences against their specific return expectations and risk tolerances when selecting an allocation strategy.
AI-Synthesized Redundancy Verdict. Generated locally by Qwen-14B based on real-time constituent weight differentials and sector tilts.
Redundancy Matrix
Interactive overlap analysis. Shared holdings weighted by the institutional min-weight formula — each stock's contribution equals its lesser weight across both funds.
Top Shared Holdings
Overlap weight = min(allocation in QQQ, allocation in SCHD)
The Difference Makers
QQQ Only — Overweight vs Peer
SCHD Only — Overweight vs Peer
Sector Tilt
Look-Through Fundamentals
QQQ Concentration
SCHD Concentration
Top Sector Divergences
Largest allocation gaps between the two funds, by sector weight.
QQQ has a +40.1% Technology tilt over SCHD.
Sector Exposure Comparison
Risk & Return Metrics
| Metric | QQQ | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.06% |
| AUM | $411.8B | $78.4B |
| Holdings | 100 | 100 |
| TTM Yield | 0.29% | 3.50% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.49% | 3.44% |
| Annual Volatility | 22.4% | 14.4% |
| Sharpe (1Y) | 1.45 | 1.30 |
| Sharpe (3Y) | 1.02 | 0.55 |
| Max Drawdown (3Y) | -22.8% | -16.1% |
QQQ Price
SCHD Price
Related Comparisons
Look-through metrics derived from constituent-level analysis. Overlap calculated using institutional min-weight methodology. Not investment advice.