Stock vs Stock Comparison

CRH plc vs Linde plc

CRH wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4.

CRH$106.52
LIN$495.91

🏆 Tale of the Tape

54
CRHLIN
10.0%Profitability (Net Margin)20.3%
20.2xValuation (P/E)33.0x
8.9%Efficiency (ROIC)10.3%
6/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
3.1Safety (Altman Z)4.0
5.3%Growth (Rev YoY)3.0%
0.90Risk (Sharpe 1Y)0.66
1.29xBalance Sheet (D/E)1.18x
3.19%FCF Yield2.05%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.190
252-Day Correlation
0.025
126-Day Correlation

Low correlation — excellent diversification pair.

Fundamentals

MetricCRHLIN
Market Cap$72.7B$230.1B
P/E Ratio20.2x33.0x
Forward P/E16.3x25.3x
P/B3.15x5.97x
Dividend Yield1.43%1.29%
Beta1.230.74

Quantitative Metrics

MetricCRHLIN
DCF Fair Value$60.02$96.04
DCF Upside-48.8%-81.1%
Piotroski F6/95/9
Altman Z3.153.96
Beneish M-2.62
FCF Yield3.19%2.05%
Net Debt/EBITDA1.6x1.2x
ROIC8.9%10.3%
WACC11.0%9.3%
ROIC – WACC-2.0pp1.1pp
Gross Margin36.1%48.8%
Net Margin10.0%20.3%
Rev Growth YoY5.3%3.0%
Sharpe (1Y)0.900.66
Max Drawdown 3Y-27.0%
FCF Payout Ratio34%55%

CRH Price

Loading chart...

LIN Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

CRH found in:

VAW5.08%
XLB4.34%
VOE1.41%
VO0.80%
VFVA0.36%
VYM0.33%
VTV0.31%
VONV0.24%
SPYV0.23%
ESGV0.14%
VOO0.13%
VONE0.12%
VTI0.11%
SPY0.11%
SPTM0.10%
ONEO0.09%
VT0.07%
VFMO0.06%
QUS0.06%

LIN found in:

IYM19.89%
VAW14.98%
XLB14.97%
MGV1.15%
VIG1.05%
VYM0.98%
VTV0.90%
SPYV0.83%
QUS0.76%
VONV0.72%
SDY0.57%
ESGV0.47%
VOO0.38%
SPY0.38%
VONE0.36%
SPTM0.35%
SPLG0.34%
VTI0.33%
VT0.21%
ONEO0.07%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

CRH vs LIN: Head-to-Head Analysis

CRH plc (CRH) and Linde plc (LIN) represent two companies in the Basic Materials sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, CRH leads 5–4 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, CRH generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 8.9% compared to LIN's 10.3%. This suggests LIN is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between CRH and LIN is 0.190, indicating low correlation, making them an effective diversification pair in a portfolio context.

CRH appears in 19 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while LIN appears in 20 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, CRH or LIN?

Our quantitative analysis compares CRH and LIN across nine fundamental dimensions. CRH wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are CRH and LIN correlated?

The 252-day correlation between CRH and LIN is 0.190. They have low correlation, offering good diversification.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.