Stock vs Stock Comparison

Eastman Chemical Company vs Linde plc

LIN wins the Tale of the Tape 7–2.

EMN$76.67
LIN$495.91

🏆 Tale of the Tape

27
EMNLIN
5.4%Profitability (Net Margin)20.3%
21.9xValuation (P/E)33.0x
5.1%Efficiency (ROIC)10.3%
4/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
2.4Safety (Altman Z)4.0
-6.7%Growth (Rev YoY)3.0%
-0.07Risk (Sharpe 1Y)0.66
1.46xBalance Sheet (D/E)1.18x
3.50%FCF Yield2.05%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.383
252-Day Correlation
0.367
126-Day Correlation

Moderately correlated — some diversification benefit from holding both.

Fundamentals

MetricEMNLIN
Market Cap$8.7B$230.1B
P/E Ratio21.9x33.0x
Forward P/E10.8x25.3x
P/B1.44x5.97x
Dividend Yield4.43%1.29%
Beta1.060.74

Quantitative Metrics

MetricEMNLIN
DCF Fair Value$29.46$96.04
DCF Upside-60.2%-81.1%
Piotroski F4/95/9
Altman Z2.373.96
Beneish M-2.67-2.62
FCF Yield3.50%2.05%
Net Debt/EBITDA2.8x1.2x
ROIC5.1%10.3%
WACC9.4%9.3%
ROIC – WACC-4.3pp1.1pp
Gross Margin21.1%48.8%
Net Margin5.4%20.3%
Rev Growth YoY-6.7%3.0%
Sharpe (1Y)-0.070.66
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio90%55%

EMN Price

Loading chart...

LIN Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

EMN found in:

SLYV0.99%
IJS0.98%
VAW0.53%
SPSM0.50%
ONEV0.28%
ONEY0.26%
VFVA0.23%
VBR0.19%
VB0.11%
VXF0.10%
ONEO0.03%
VYM0.03%
SPTM0.01%
SPLG0.01%

LIN found in:

IYM19.89%
VAW14.98%
XLB14.97%
MGV1.15%
VIG1.05%
VYM0.98%
VTV0.90%
SPYV0.83%
QUS0.76%
VONV0.72%
SDY0.57%
ESGV0.47%
VOO0.38%
SPY0.38%
VONE0.36%
SPTM0.35%
SPLG0.34%
VTI0.33%
VT0.21%
ONEO0.07%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

EMN vs LIN: Head-to-Head Analysis

Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) and Linde plc (LIN) represent two companies in the Basic Materials sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, LIN leads 7–2 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, EMN generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 5.1% compared to LIN's 10.3%. This suggests LIN is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between EMN and LIN is 0.383, indicating moderate co-movement, with some diversification value from holding both in a portfolio context.

EMN appears in 14 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while LIN appears in 20 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, EMN or LIN?

Our quantitative analysis compares EMN and LIN across nine fundamental dimensions. LIN wins the Tale of the Tape 7–2. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are EMN and LIN correlated?

The 252-day correlation between EMN and LIN is 0.383. They show moderate correlation — partially diversifying.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.