Stock vs Stock Comparison

Moody's Corporation vs Arch Capital Group Ltd.

ACGL wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4.

MCO$453.60
ACGL$87.89

🏆 Tale of the Tape

45
MCOACGL
31.9%Profitability (Net Margin)22.8%
32.5xValuation (P/E)6.9x
21.0%Efficiency (ROIC)5.1%
8/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
6.9Safety (Altman Z)1.3
8.9%Growth (Rev YoY)14.0%
-0.01Risk (Sharpe 1Y)0.16
2.76xBalance Sheet (D/E)2.27x
3.19%FCF Yield17.06%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.188
252-Day Correlation
0.075
126-Day Correlation

Low correlation — excellent diversification pair.

Fundamentals

MetricMCOACGL
Market Cap$79.2B$31.2B
P/E Ratio32.5x6.9x
Forward P/E24.4x9.0x
P/B26.44x1.34x
Dividend Yield0.91%
Beta1.370.33

Quantitative Metrics

MetricMCOACGL
DCF Fair Value$168.90$453.32
DCF Upside-61.6%+366.9%
Piotroski F8/95/9
Altman Z6.871.31
Beneish M-2.49
FCF Yield3.19%17.06%
Net Debt/EBITDA1.2x0.3x
ROIC21.0%5.1%
WACC12.9%7.7%
ROIC – WACC8.1pp-2.6pp
Gross Margin74.4%
Net Margin31.9%22.8%
Rev Growth YoY8.9%14.0%
Sharpe (1Y)-0.010.16
Max Drawdown 3Y-22.4%
FCF Payout Ratio27%1%

MCO Price

Loading chart...

ACGL Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

MCO found in:

XLF0.93%
VFH0.88%
MGK0.42%
VIG0.32%
SCHG0.28%
IWF0.24%
DGRW0.24%
VONG0.23%
VUG0.22%
RSP0.21%
QUS0.16%
ESGV0.14%
IVV0.13%
SPLG0.12%
SPYV0.12%
ITOT0.12%
SCHX0.12%
SCHB0.11%
VOO0.11%
VONE0.11%
SPY0.11%
VTI0.10%
SPTM0.10%
SPYG0.09%
URTH0.09%
ACWI0.09%
ONEO0.08%
VT0.06%

ACGL found in:

KIE1.79%
ONEV0.96%
VOE0.57%
XLF0.47%
VFH0.41%
ONEO0.33%
VO0.32%
QUS0.21%
VFVA0.16%
VTV0.12%
SPYV0.12%
VONV0.10%
ESGV0.07%
SPLG0.05%
SPY0.05%
SPTM0.05%
VOO0.05%
VTI0.05%
VONE0.05%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

MCO vs ACGL: Head-to-Head Analysis

Moody's Corporation (MCO) and Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) represent two companies in the Financial Services sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, ACGL leads 5–4 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, MCO generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 21.0% compared to ACGL's 5.1%. This suggests MCO is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between MCO and ACGL is 0.188, indicating low correlation, making them an effective diversification pair in a portfolio context.

MCO appears in 28 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while ACGL appears in 19 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, MCO or ACGL?

Our quantitative analysis compares MCO and ACGL across nine fundamental dimensions. ACGL wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are MCO and ACGL correlated?

The 252-day correlation between MCO and ACGL is 0.188. They have low correlation, offering good diversification.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.