Stock vs Stock Comparison

W.W. Grainger, Inc. vs American Battery Technology Company

GWW wins the Tale of the Tape 7–2.

GWW$1284.22
ABAT

🏆 Tale of the Tape

72
GWWABAT
9.5%Profitability (Net Margin)-1090.0%
33.2xValuation (P/E)
28.2%Efficiency (ROIC)-52.2%
6/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
12.6Safety (Altman Z)
4.5%Growth (Rev YoY)1149.0%
0.72Risk (Sharpe 1Y)
1.16xBalance Sheet (D/E)0.20x
2.32%FCF Yield

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Fundamentals

MetricGWWABAT
Market Cap$58.3B
P/E Ratio33.2x
Forward P/E24.5x
P/B14.83x
Dividend Yield0.75%
Beta1.04

Quantitative Metrics

MetricGWWABAT
DCF Fair Value$188.69
DCF Upside-83.8%
Piotroski F6/95/9
Altman Z12.65
Beneish M-2.555.95
FCF Yield2.32%
Net Debt/EBITDA0.6x
ROIC28.2%-52.2%
WACC11.2%
ROIC – WACC17.0pp
Gross Margin39.1%-246.5%
Net Margin9.5%-1090.0%
Rev Growth YoY4.5%1149.0%
Sharpe (1Y)0.72
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio35%

GWW Price

Loading chart...

ABAT Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

GWW found in:

NOBL1.50%
VOT1.23%
XLI1.02%
VIS0.74%
VO0.53%
VFQY0.43%
SDY0.37%
ONEV0.33%
VIG0.23%
RSP0.21%
SCHG0.19%
SPYV0.19%
VUG0.17%
QUS0.16%
ONEO0.15%
IWF0.15%
VONG0.14%
DGRW0.09%
SPY0.09%
SPTM0.08%
SCHX0.08%
VTI0.08%
VOO0.08%
VONE0.08%
IVV0.08%
SCHB0.07%
SPLG0.07%
ITOT0.07%
URTH0.06%
ACWI0.05%
VT0.04%
IWD0.02%

ABAT found in:

XME0.50%
VFMO0.09%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

GWW vs ABAT: Head-to-Head Analysis

W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) and American Battery Technology Company (ABAT) represent two companies in the Industrials sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, GWW leads 7–2 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, GWW generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 28.2% compared to ABAT's -52.2%. This suggests GWW is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

GWW appears in 32 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while ABAT appears in 2 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, GWW or ABAT?

Our quantitative analysis compares GWW and ABAT across nine fundamental dimensions. GWW wins the Tale of the Tape 7–2. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are GWW and ABAT correlated?

Correlation data is not yet available for this pair. Check back after both stocks have sufficient trading history.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.