Stock vs Stock Comparison

LyondellBasell Industries N.V. vs Linde plc

LIN wins the Tale of the Tape 8–1.

LYB$67.30
LIN$507.57

🏆 Tale of the Tape

18
LYBLIN
-2.5%Profitability (Net Margin)20.3%
Valuation (P/E)33.0x
-0.7%Efficiency (ROIC)10.3%
3/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
1.9Safety (Altman Z)4.0
-9.7%Growth (Rev YoY)3.0%
0.83Risk (Sharpe 1Y)0.66
2.33xBalance Sheet (D/E)1.18x
1.18%FCF Yield2.05%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.296
252-Day Correlation
0.224
126-Day Correlation

Low correlation — excellent diversification pair.

Fundamentals

MetricLYBLIN
Market Cap$21.5B$230.1B
P/E Ratio33.0x
Forward P/E8.8x25.3x
P/B2.13x5.97x
Dividend Yield6.18%1.29%
Beta0.350.74

Quantitative Metrics

MetricLYBLIN
DCF Fair Value$96.04
DCF Upside-81.1%
Piotroski F3/95/9
Altman Z1.913.96
Beneish M-2.84-2.62
FCF Yield1.18%2.05%
Net Debt/EBITDA7.5x1.2x
ROIC-0.7%10.3%
WACC6.6%9.3%
ROIC – WACC-7.3pp1.1pp
Gross Margin8.6%48.8%
Net Margin-2.5%20.3%
Rev Growth YoY-9.7%3.0%
Sharpe (1Y)0.830.66
Max Drawdown 3Y-55.4%
FCF Payout Ratio459%55%

LYB Price

Loading chart...

LIN Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

LYB found in:

XLB2.26%
SPYD1.61%
VAW1.23%
DVY1.21%
ONEY0.56%
ONEV0.43%
VBR0.22%
VOE0.17%
VB0.12%
VO0.10%
VYM0.08%
QUS0.07%
SPYV0.06%
VONV0.06%
ONEO0.05%
VTV0.04%
VOO0.03%
VTI0.03%
VONE0.03%
SPY0.03%
SPTM0.03%
SPLG0.02%

LIN found in:

IYM19.89%
VAW14.98%
XLB14.97%
MGV1.15%
VIG1.05%
VYM0.98%
VTV0.90%
SPYV0.83%
QUS0.76%
VONV0.72%
SDY0.57%
ESGV0.47%
VOO0.38%
SPY0.38%
VONE0.36%
SPTM0.35%
SPLG0.34%
VTI0.33%
VT0.21%
ONEO0.07%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

LYB vs LIN: Head-to-Head Analysis

LyondellBasell Industries N.V. (LYB) and Linde plc (LIN) represent two companies in the Basic Materials sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, LIN leads 8–1 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, LYB generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of -0.7% compared to LIN's 10.3%. This suggests LIN is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between LYB and LIN is 0.296, indicating low correlation, making them an effective diversification pair in a portfolio context.

LYB appears in 22 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while LIN appears in 20 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, LYB or LIN?

Our quantitative analysis compares LYB and LIN across nine fundamental dimensions. LIN wins the Tale of the Tape 8–1. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are LYB and LIN correlated?

The 252-day correlation between LYB and LIN is 0.296. They have low correlation, offering good diversification.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.