Stock vs Stock Comparison

Deckers Outdoor Corporation vs Airbnb, Inc.

DECK wins the Tale of the Tape 7–2.

DECK
ABNB$133.59

🏆 Tale of the Tape

72
DECKABNB
19.4%Profitability (Net Margin)20.5%
13.8xValuation (P/E)32.9x
35.2%Efficiency (ROIC)23.5%
9/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
12.2Safety (Altman Z)4.2
16.3%Growth (Rev YoY)10.3%
Risk (Sharpe 1Y)0.23
0.42xBalance Sheet (D/E)1.71x
7.67%FCF Yield

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Fundamentals

MetricDECKABNB
Market Cap$14.2B$79.1B
P/E Ratio13.8x32.9x
Forward P/E13.3x22.1x
P/B5.30x10.39x
Dividend Yield
Beta1.161.21

Quantitative Metrics

MetricDECKABNB
DCF Fair Value$185.81
DCF Upside
Piotroski F9/95/9
Altman Z12.194.17
Beneish M-2.59-2.87
FCF Yield7.67%
Net Debt/EBITDA-1.3x
ROIC35.2%23.5%
WACC11.8%
ROIC – WACC23.3pp
Gross Margin57.9%83.0%
Net Margin19.4%20.5%
Rev Growth YoY16.3%10.3%
Sharpe (1Y)0.23
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio

DECK Price

Loading chart...

ABNB Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

DECK found in:

VBK0.43%
VFQY0.38%
XLY0.33%
VCR0.27%
RSP0.23%
VB0.19%
ONEV0.10%
SCHG0.06%
IWF0.05%
SPYV0.05%
VONG0.05%
QUS0.05%
ESGV0.03%
SCHX0.03%
IVV0.03%
SCHB0.03%
ITOT0.02%
SPY0.02%
SPTM0.02%
SPLG0.02%
URTH0.02%
ONEO0.02%
ACWI0.02%
VOO0.02%

ABNB found in:

MOAT2.72%
ARKF1.68%
VFQY1.37%
XLY1.30%
VCR0.93%
VFMV0.93%
ARKW0.50%
MGK0.38%
QQQ0.32%
SCHG0.22%
RSP0.20%
IWF0.19%
VONG0.19%
VUG0.17%
ONEO0.13%
ESGV0.11%
SPYV0.10%
VOO0.10%
IVV0.10%
SPLG0.09%
SCHX0.09%
VONE0.09%
SPY0.09%
ITOT0.09%
SCHB0.09%
SPTM0.09%
VTI0.08%
SPYG0.08%
URTH0.07%
ACWI0.06%
VT0.05%
QUS0.03%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

DECK vs ABNB: Head-to-Head Analysis

Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) and Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) represent two companies in the Consumer Cyclical sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, DECK leads 7–2 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, DECK generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 35.2% compared to ABNB's 23.5%. This suggests DECK is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

DECK appears in 24 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while ABNB appears in 32 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, DECK or ABNB?

Our quantitative analysis compares DECK and ABNB across nine fundamental dimensions. DECK wins the Tale of the Tape 7–2. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are DECK and ABNB correlated?

Correlation data is not yet available for this pair. Check back after both stocks have sufficient trading history.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.