Stock vs Stock Comparison

Lam Research Corporation vs Axcelis Technologies, Inc.

LRCX wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3.

LRCX$343.71
ACLS

🏆 Tale of the Tape

63
LRCXACLS
29.1%Profitability (Net Margin)14.3%
60.3xValuation (P/E)24.1x
32.8%Efficiency (ROIC)9.8%
7/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
21.5Safety (Altman Z)7.3
23.7%Growth (Rev YoY)-17.6%
2.89Risk (Sharpe 1Y)
1.16xBalance Sheet (D/E)0.32x
1.65%FCF Yield3.95%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Fundamentals

MetricLRCXACLS
Market Cap$397.9B$2.8B
P/E Ratio60.3x24.1x
Forward P/E40.1x20.3x
P/B37.59x2.72x
Dividend Yield0.33%
Beta1.821.76

Quantitative Metrics

MetricLRCXACLS
DCF Fair Value$34.66$24.44
DCF Upside-87.0%
Piotroski F7/95/9
Altman Z21.467.31
Beneish M-2.34-2.07
FCF Yield1.65%3.95%
Net Debt/EBITDA-0.4x-0.6x
ROIC32.8%9.8%
WACC15.6%15.4%
ROIC – WACC17.2pp-5.7pp
Gross Margin48.7%44.9%
Net Margin29.1%14.3%
Rev Growth YoY23.7%-17.6%
Sharpe (1Y)2.89
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio21%

LRCX Price

Loading chart...

ACLS Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

LRCX found in:

SMH4.75%
XNTK4.34%
SOXX4.30%
RDVY3.70%
MTUM3.61%
QUAL3.22%
XLK2.51%
VFQY1.71%
VGT1.48%
VIG1.45%
MGK1.32%
QQQ1.18%
VFMV1.18%
VFMO1.08%
SPYG1.08%
VONG1.04%
QUS1.04%
SCHV0.99%
IWF0.97%
VUG0.95%
ONEO0.68%
SPY0.59%
SPTM0.55%
ESGV0.54%
VOO0.52%
VONE0.49%
SCHX0.47%
VTI0.46%
SCHB0.44%
DGRW0.38%
IVV0.37%
SPLG0.35%
URTH0.34%
ITOT0.32%
ACWI0.31%
VT0.29%
RSP0.27%

ACLS found in:

SLY0.59%
SLYG0.36%
SPSM0.28%
SLYV0.20%
VTWO0.13%
VBR0.10%
VGT0.07%
SPTM0.01%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

LRCX vs ACLS: Head-to-Head Analysis

Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) represent two companies in the Technology sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, LRCX leads 6–3 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, LRCX generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 32.8% compared to ACLS's 9.8%. This suggests LRCX is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

LRCX appears in 37 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while ACLS appears in 8 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, LRCX or ACLS?

Our quantitative analysis compares LRCX and ACLS across nine fundamental dimensions. LRCX wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are LRCX and ACLS correlated?

Correlation data is not yet available for this pair. Check back after both stocks have sufficient trading history.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.