Stock vs Stock Comparison

Waters Corporation vs AbCellera Biologics Inc.

WAT wins the Tale of the Tape 6–2.

WAT$379.77
ABCL

🏆 Tale of the Tape

62
WATABCL
20.3%Profitability (Net Margin)-194.9%
48.8xValuation (P/E)
17.0%Efficiency (ROIC)-12.4%
4/9Health (Piotroski F)4/9
11.7Safety (Altman Z)
7.0%Growth (Rev YoY)160.6%
-0.05Risk (Sharpe 1Y)
0.98xBalance Sheet (D/E)0.40x
1.70%FCF Yield

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Fundamentals

MetricWATABCL
Market Cap$37.7B
P/E Ratio48.8x
Forward P/E23.4x
P/B8.92x
Dividend Yield
Beta1.14

Quantitative Metrics

MetricWATABCL
DCF Fair Value$48.56
DCF Upside-85.0%
Piotroski F4/94/9
Altman Z11.74
Beneish M-2.38
FCF Yield1.70%
Net Debt/EBITDA0.3x
ROIC17.0%-12.4%
WACC12.0%
ROIC – WACC5.0pp
Gross Margin59.3%
Net Margin20.3%-194.9%
Rev Growth YoY7.0%160.6%
Sharpe (1Y)-0.05
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio

WAT Price

Loading chart...

ABCL Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

WAT found in:

VOT0.71%
XLV0.62%
VHT0.49%
VO0.31%
RSP0.18%
VFQY0.18%
ONEV0.13%
SCHG0.12%
SPYV0.12%
ONEO0.08%
IWD0.07%
VUG0.06%
VONV0.06%
ESGV0.06%
VTV0.06%
QUS0.06%
SPY0.05%
SCHX0.05%
VONE0.05%
VOO0.05%
SPTM0.05%
SCHB0.05%
VTI0.04%
IVV0.04%
URTH0.04%
SPLG0.03%
ITOT0.03%
IWF0.03%
VONG0.03%
ACWI0.02%

ABCL found in:

GWX0.09%
SPDW0.01%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

WAT vs ABCL: Head-to-Head Analysis

Waters Corporation (WAT) and AbCellera Biologics Inc. (ABCL) represent two companies in the Healthcare sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, WAT leads 6–2 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, WAT generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 17.0% compared to ABCL's -12.4%. This suggests WAT is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

WAT appears in 30 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while ABCL appears in 2 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, WAT or ABCL?

Our quantitative analysis compares WAT and ABCL across nine fundamental dimensions. WAT wins the Tale of the Tape 6–2. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are WAT and ABCL correlated?

Correlation data is not yet available for this pair. Check back after both stocks have sufficient trading history.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.