Stock vs Stock Comparison

Brown & Brown, Inc. vs Arch Capital Group Ltd.

ACGL wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4.

BRO$55.14
ACGL$87.89

🏆 Tale of the Tape

45
BROACGL
18.3%Profitability (Net Margin)22.8%
18.3xValuation (P/E)6.9x
6.1%Efficiency (ROIC)5.1%
4/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
1.5Safety (Altman Z)1.3
22.5%Growth (Rev YoY)14.0%
-2.01Risk (Sharpe 1Y)0.16
1.39xBalance Sheet (D/E)2.27x
4.94%FCF Yield17.06%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.485
252-Day Correlation
0.554
126-Day Correlation

Moderately correlated — some diversification benefit from holding both.

Fundamentals

MetricBROACGL
Market Cap$19.1B$31.2B
P/E Ratio18.3x6.9x
Forward P/E11.6x9.0x
P/B1.50x1.34x
Dividend Yield1.15%
Beta0.660.33

Quantitative Metrics

MetricBROACGL
DCF Fair Value$122.09$453.32
DCF Upside+81.0%+366.9%
Piotroski F4/95/9
Altman Z1.481.31
Beneish M-2.44
FCF Yield4.94%17.06%
Net Debt/EBITDA2.8x0.3x
ROIC6.1%5.1%
WACC8.5%7.7%
ROIC – WACC-2.4pp-2.6pp
Gross Margin49.1%
Net Margin18.3%22.8%
Rev Growth YoY22.5%14.0%
Sharpe (1Y)-2.010.16
Max Drawdown 3Y-48.6%-22.4%
FCF Payout Ratio14%1%

BRO Price

Loading chart...

ACGL Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

BRO found in:

KIE1.51%
NOBL1.28%
VOT0.41%
SDY0.37%
XLF0.23%
VFH0.21%
RSP0.18%
VO0.18%
ONEV0.13%
VIG0.08%
SCHV0.07%
VTV0.07%
SPYV0.06%
IWD0.06%
VONV0.05%
ESGV0.04%
IVV0.04%
SPLG0.04%
ITOT0.04%
SCHX0.03%
SCHB0.03%
VTI0.03%
VOO0.03%
VONE0.03%
SPY0.03%
ONEO0.03%
SPTM0.02%
URTH0.02%
ACWI0.02%
QUS0.01%
VONG0.01%
IWF0.01%

ACGL found in:

KIE1.79%
ONEV0.96%
VOE0.57%
XLF0.47%
VFH0.41%
ONEO0.33%
VO0.32%
QUS0.21%
VFVA0.16%
VTV0.12%
SPYV0.12%
VONV0.10%
ESGV0.07%
SPLG0.05%
SPY0.05%
SPTM0.05%
VOO0.05%
VTI0.05%
VONE0.05%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

BRO vs ACGL: Head-to-Head Analysis

Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO) and Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) represent two companies in the Financial Services sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, ACGL leads 5–4 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, BRO generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 6.1% compared to ACGL's 5.1%. This suggests BRO is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between BRO and ACGL is 0.485, indicating moderate co-movement, with some diversification value from holding both in a portfolio context.

BRO appears in 32 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while ACGL appears in 19 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, BRO or ACGL?

Our quantitative analysis compares BRO and ACGL across nine fundamental dimensions. ACGL wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are BRO and ACGL correlated?

The 252-day correlation between BRO and ACGL is 0.485. They show moderate correlation — partially diversifying.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.