Stock vs Stock Comparison

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. vs Axcelis Technologies, Inc.

CDNS wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3.

CDNS$416.39
ACLS

🏆 Tale of the Tape

63
CDNSACLS
20.9%Profitability (Net Margin)14.3%
87.8xValuation (P/E)24.1x
15.2%Efficiency (ROIC)9.8%
7/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
11.8Safety (Altman Z)7.3
14.1%Growth (Rev YoY)-17.6%
0.28Risk (Sharpe 1Y)
0.85xBalance Sheet (D/E)0.32x
2.18%FCF Yield3.95%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Fundamentals

MetricCDNSACLS
Market Cap$103.4B$2.8B
P/E Ratio87.8x24.1x
Forward P/E39.9x20.3x
P/B15.76x2.72x
Dividend Yield
Beta1.131.76

Quantitative Metrics

MetricCDNSACLS
DCF Fair Value$99.50$24.44
DCF Upside-65.5%
Piotroski F7/95/9
Altman Z11.807.31
Beneish M-2.44-2.07
FCF Yield2.18%3.95%
Net Debt/EBITDA-0.3x-0.6x
ROIC15.2%9.8%
WACC11.0%15.4%
ROIC – WACC4.2pp-5.7pp
Gross Margin86.4%44.9%
Net Margin20.9%14.3%
Rev Growth YoY14.1%-17.6%
Sharpe (1Y)0.28
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio

CDNS Price

Loading chart...

ACLS Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

CDNS found in:

SMH2.67%
VFQY0.95%
XSW0.86%
XLK0.65%
MGK0.52%
QQQ0.47%
VGT0.46%
SCHG0.31%
VONG0.29%
VUG0.28%
IWF0.27%
QUS0.26%
SPYG0.18%
RSP0.17%
SPLG0.16%
SPY0.15%
ESGV0.15%
VOO0.15%
IVV0.15%
SPTM0.14%
VONE0.14%
SCHX0.13%
VTI0.13%
ITOT0.13%
SPYV0.13%
SCHB0.12%
URTH0.10%
ACWI0.09%
VT0.08%
ONEO0.05%

ACLS found in:

SLY0.59%
SLYG0.36%
SPSM0.28%
SLYV0.20%
VTWO0.13%
VBR0.10%
VGT0.07%
SPTM0.01%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

CDNS vs ACLS: Head-to-Head Analysis

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) and Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) represent two companies in the Technology sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, CDNS leads 6–3 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, CDNS generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 15.2% compared to ACLS's 9.8%. This suggests CDNS is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

CDNS appears in 30 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while ACLS appears in 8 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, CDNS or ACLS?

Our quantitative analysis compares CDNS and ACLS across nine fundamental dimensions. CDNS wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are CDNS and ACLS correlated?

Correlation data is not yet available for this pair. Check back after both stocks have sufficient trading history.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.