Stock vs Stock Comparison

Iron Mountain Incorporated vs Prologis, Inc.

IRM and PLD are evenly matched across key metrics.

IRM$128.46
PLD$140.41

🏆 Tale of the Tape

44
IRMPLD
2.1%Profitability (Net Margin)37.9%
139.4xValuation (P/E)36.1x
4.5%Efficiency (ROIC)3.9%
4/9Health (Piotroski F)4/9
1.0Safety (Altman Z)2.1
12.2%Growth (Rev YoY)7.2%
1.04Risk (Sharpe 1Y)1.53
-33.76xBalance Sheet (D/E)0.71x
-2.07%FCF Yield

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.396
252-Day Correlation
0.333
126-Day Correlation

Moderately correlated — some diversification benefit from holding both.

Fundamentals

MetricIRMPLD
Market Cap$38.2B$133.8B
P/E Ratio139.4x36.1x
Forward P/E48.0x42.2x
P/B-31.40x2.50x
Dividend Yield2.69%2.98%
Beta1.231.35

Quantitative Metrics

MetricIRMPLD
DCF Fair Value
DCF Upside
Piotroski F4/94/9
Altman Z0.992.10
Beneish M-2.65-2.29
FCF Yield-2.07%
Net Debt/EBITDA7.6x4.6x
ROIC4.5%3.9%
WACC9.3%11.4%
ROIC – WACC-4.8pp-7.5pp
Gross Margin55.4%74.6%
Net Margin2.1%37.9%
Rev Growth YoY12.2%7.2%
Sharpe (1Y)1.041.53
Max Drawdown 3Y-39.0%
FCF Payout Ratio

IRM Price

Loading chart...

PLD Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

IRM found in:

XLRE3.93%
IYR2.40%
SCHH2.28%
VNQ1.97%
SPYD1.62%
VOT0.83%
VO0.36%
RSP0.21%
VTV0.14%
SPYV0.13%
VONV0.11%
SCHV0.11%
IWD0.10%
VOO0.06%
ESGV0.06%
VONE0.06%
SPY0.06%
SPTM0.05%
SCHX0.05%
SPLG0.05%
VTI0.05%
SCHB0.05%
IVV0.04%
URTH0.04%
ITOT0.04%
VT0.03%
ACWI0.03%
ONEO0.02%
QUS0.01%

PLD found in:

IYR9.18%
XLRE9.15%
SCHH9.08%
VNQ6.99%
MGV0.65%
VTV0.51%
SPYV0.47%
SCHV0.45%
IWD0.40%
VONV0.40%
ESGV0.25%
SCHX0.21%
SPY0.21%
VOO0.21%
IVV0.20%
VONE0.20%
SCHB0.20%
SPTM0.20%
RSP0.20%
SPLG0.19%
VTI0.19%
ITOT0.18%
URTH0.15%
ACWI0.13%
VT0.12%
QUS0.09%
VFMV0.08%
ONEO0.07%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

IRM vs PLD: Head-to-Head Analysis

Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) and Prologis, Inc. (PLD) represent two companies in the Real Estate sector. Our quantitative Tale of the Tape shows these companies are evenly matched across profitability, valuation, and risk metrics.

In terms of capital efficiency, IRM generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 4.5% compared to PLD's 3.9%. This suggests IRM is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between IRM and PLD is 0.396, indicating moderate co-movement, with some diversification value from holding both in a portfolio context.

IRM appears in 29 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while PLD appears in 28 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, IRM or PLD?

Our quantitative analysis compares IRM and PLD across nine fundamental dimensions. IRM and PLD are evenly matched across key metrics. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are IRM and PLD correlated?

The 252-day correlation between IRM and PLD is 0.396. They show moderate correlation — partially diversifying.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.