Stock vs Stock Comparison

Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. vs Arch Capital Group Ltd.

ACGL wins the Tale of the Tape 9–0.

MMC$173.97
ACGL$87.62

🏆 Tale of the Tape

09
MMCACGL
Profitability (Net Margin)22.8%
21.9xValuation (P/E)6.9x
Efficiency (ROIC)5.1%
Health (Piotroski F)5/9
Safety (Altman Z)1.3
Growth (Rev YoY)14.0%
Risk (Sharpe 1Y)0.16
Balance Sheet (D/E)2.27x
FCF Yield17.06%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.636
252-Day Correlation
0.581
126-Day Correlation

Moderately correlated — some diversification benefit from holding both.

Fundamentals

MetricMMCACGL
Market Cap$89.8B$31.2B
P/E Ratio21.9x6.9x
Forward P/E17.7x9.0x
P/B5.91x1.34x
Dividend Yield0.02%
Beta0.750.33

Quantitative Metrics

MetricMMCACGL
DCF Fair Value$453.32
DCF Upside+366.9%
Piotroski F5/9
Altman Z1.31
Beneish M
FCF Yield17.06%
Net Debt/EBITDA0.3x
ROIC5.1%
WACC7.7%
ROIC – WACC-2.6pp
Gross Margin
Net Margin22.8%
Rev Growth YoY14.0%
Sharpe (1Y)0.16
Max Drawdown 3Y-22.4%
FCF Payout Ratio1%

MMC Price

Loading chart...

ACGL Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

MMC found in:

DGRW0.77%
SCHV0.31%
IWD0.24%
RSP0.20%
IVV0.16%
SPLG0.15%
SCHX0.15%
ITOT0.14%
SCHB0.14%
URTH0.11%
ACWI0.10%
IWF0.04%

ACGL found in:

KIE1.79%
ONEV0.96%
VOE0.57%
XLF0.47%
VFH0.41%
ONEO0.33%
VO0.32%
QUS0.21%
VFVA0.16%
VTV0.12%
SPYV0.12%
VONV0.10%
ESGV0.07%
SPLG0.05%
SPY0.05%
SPTM0.05%
VOO0.05%
VTI0.05%
VONE0.05%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

MMC vs ACGL: Head-to-Head Analysis

Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) and Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) represent two companies in the Financial Services sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, ACGL leads 9–0 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

The 252-day rolling correlation between MMC and ACGL is 0.636, indicating moderate co-movement, with some diversification value from holding both in a portfolio context.

MMC appears in 12 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while ACGL appears in 19 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, MMC or ACGL?

Our quantitative analysis compares MMC and ACGL across nine fundamental dimensions. ACGL wins the Tale of the Tape 9–0. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are MMC and ACGL correlated?

The 252-day correlation between MMC and ACGL is 0.636. They show moderate correlation — partially diversifying.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.