Stock vs Stock Comparison

Public Storage vs Prologis, Inc.

PSA and PLD are evenly matched across key metrics.

PSA$299.14
PLD$140.41

🏆 Tale of the Tape

44
PSAPLD
37.0%Profitability (Net Margin)37.9%
31.3xValuation (P/E)36.1x
8.4%Efficiency (ROIC)3.9%
4/9Health (Piotroski F)4/9
3.3Safety (Altman Z)2.1
2.7%Growth (Rev YoY)7.2%
0.25Risk (Sharpe 1Y)1.53
1.16xBalance Sheet (D/E)0.71x
4.69%FCF Yield

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.538
252-Day Correlation
0.452
126-Day Correlation

Moderately correlated — some diversification benefit from holding both.

Fundamentals

MetricPSAPLD
Market Cap$53.3B$133.8B
P/E Ratio31.3x36.1x
Forward P/E30.0x42.2x
P/B10.88x2.50x
Dividend Yield3.95%2.98%
Beta0.981.35

Quantitative Metrics

MetricPSAPLD
DCF Fair Value$192.41
DCF Upside-35.0%
Piotroski F4/94/9
Altman Z3.352.10
Beneish M9.04-2.29
FCF Yield4.69%
Net Debt/EBITDA3.1x4.6x
ROIC8.4%3.9%
WACC9.8%11.4%
ROIC – WACC-1.4pp-7.5pp
Gross Margin72.9%74.6%
Net Margin37.0%37.9%
Rev Growth YoY2.7%7.2%
Sharpe (1Y)0.251.53
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio80%

PSA Price

Loading chart...

PLD Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

PSA found in:

XLRE4.35%
SCHH3.45%
IYR3.41%
VNQ2.53%
SPYD1.26%
VOE0.85%
ONEY0.62%
VO0.48%
ONEV0.40%
RSP0.20%
VTV0.19%
SPYV0.17%
SCHV0.16%
ONEO0.15%
VONV0.13%
IWD0.12%
ESGV0.09%
VOO0.08%
SCHX0.08%
SPLG0.08%
SPY0.08%
SCHB0.07%
SPTM0.07%
VONE0.07%
VTI0.07%
IVV0.07%
ITOT0.06%
URTH0.06%
ACWI0.05%
VT0.04%
QUS0.02%
IWF0.02%
VONG0.02%

PLD found in:

IYR9.18%
XLRE9.15%
SCHH9.08%
VNQ6.99%
MGV0.65%
VTV0.51%
SPYV0.47%
SCHV0.45%
IWD0.40%
VONV0.40%
ESGV0.25%
SCHX0.21%
SPY0.21%
VOO0.21%
IVV0.20%
VONE0.20%
SCHB0.20%
SPTM0.20%
RSP0.20%
SPLG0.19%
VTI0.19%
ITOT0.18%
URTH0.15%
ACWI0.13%
VT0.12%
QUS0.09%
VFMV0.08%
ONEO0.07%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

PSA vs PLD: Head-to-Head Analysis

Public Storage (PSA) and Prologis, Inc. (PLD) represent two companies in the Real Estate sector. Our quantitative Tale of the Tape shows these companies are evenly matched across profitability, valuation, and risk metrics.

In terms of capital efficiency, PSA generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 8.4% compared to PLD's 3.9%. This suggests PSA is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between PSA and PLD is 0.538, indicating moderate co-movement, with some diversification value from holding both in a portfolio context.

PSA appears in 33 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while PLD appears in 28 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, PSA or PLD?

Our quantitative analysis compares PSA and PLD across nine fundamental dimensions. PSA and PLD are evenly matched across key metrics. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are PSA and PLD correlated?

The 252-day correlation between PSA and PLD is 0.538. They show moderate correlation — partially diversifying.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.