Stock vs Stock Comparison

PayPal Holdings, Inc. vs Arch Capital Group Ltd.

ACGL wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3.

PYPL$44.53
ACGL$87.62

🏆 Tale of the Tape

36
PYPLACGL
15.8%Profitability (Net Margin)22.8%
8.4xValuation (P/E)6.9x
15.8%Efficiency (ROIC)5.1%
8/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
1.9Safety (Altman Z)1.3
4.3%Growth (Rev YoY)14.0%
-0.67Risk (Sharpe 1Y)0.16
2.96xBalance Sheet (D/E)2.27x
12.76%FCF Yield17.06%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.087
252-Day Correlation
-0.007
126-Day Correlation

Low correlation — excellent diversification pair.

Fundamentals

MetricPYPLACGL
Market Cap$39.5B$31.2B
P/E Ratio8.4x6.9x
Forward P/E7.7x9.0x
P/B1.99x1.34x
Dividend Yield1.25%
Beta1.400.33

Quantitative Metrics

MetricPYPLACGL
DCF Fair Value$60.28$453.32
DCF Upside+26.9%+366.9%
Piotroski F8/95/9
Altman Z1.871.31
Beneish M-2.52
FCF Yield12.76%17.06%
Net Debt/EBITDA0.3x0.3x
ROIC15.8%5.1%
WACC11.6%7.7%
ROIC – WACC4.1pp-2.6pp
Gross Margin46.6%
Net Margin15.8%22.8%
Rev Growth YoY4.3%14.0%
Sharpe (1Y)-0.670.16
Max Drawdown 3Y-57.3%-22.4%
FCF Payout Ratio2%1%

PYPL Price

Loading chart...

ACGL Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

PYPL found in:

VFQY1.07%
ARKF0.80%
XLF0.55%
VOE0.52%
DGRW0.49%
VFH0.32%
QQQ0.30%
VO0.29%
VFVA0.23%
RSP0.17%
SCHV0.15%
SPYV0.14%
IWD0.14%
SPLG0.11%
QUS0.11%
VTV0.11%
IVV0.09%
VONV0.09%
ITOT0.08%
VOO0.07%
SCHX0.07%
SCHB0.06%
SPY0.06%
SPTM0.06%
VTI0.06%
ONEO0.05%
ESGV0.05%
URTH0.05%
ACWI0.05%
VONE0.04%
VT0.04%

ACGL found in:

KIE1.79%
ONEV0.96%
VOE0.57%
XLF0.47%
VFH0.41%
ONEO0.33%
VO0.32%
QUS0.21%
VFVA0.16%
VTV0.12%
SPYV0.12%
VONV0.10%
ESGV0.07%
SPLG0.05%
SPY0.05%
SPTM0.05%
VOO0.05%
VTI0.05%
VONE0.05%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

PYPL vs ACGL: Head-to-Head Analysis

PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) and Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) represent two companies in the Financial Services sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, ACGL leads 6–3 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, PYPL generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 15.8% compared to ACGL's 5.1%. This suggests PYPL is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between PYPL and ACGL is 0.087, indicating low correlation, making them an effective diversification pair in a portfolio context.

PYPL appears in 31 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while ACGL appears in 19 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, PYPL or ACGL?

Our quantitative analysis compares PYPL and ACGL across nine fundamental dimensions. ACGL wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are PYPL and ACGL correlated?

The 252-day correlation between PYPL and ACGL is 0.087. They have low correlation, offering good diversification.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.