Stock vs Stock Comparison

BlackRock, Inc. vs Arch Capital Group Ltd.

BLK wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4.

BLK$990.87
ACGL$87.89

🏆 Tale of the Tape

54
BLKACGL
22.9%Profitability (Net Margin)22.8%
26.3xValuation (P/E)6.9x
3.9%Efficiency (ROIC)5.1%
3/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
1.7Safety (Altman Z)1.3
18.7%Growth (Rev YoY)14.0%
0.54Risk (Sharpe 1Y)0.16
1.76xBalance Sheet (D/E)2.27x
2.27%FCF Yield17.06%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.140
252-Day Correlation
0.053
126-Day Correlation

Low correlation — excellent diversification pair.

Fundamentals

MetricBLKACGL
Market Cap$162.5B$31.2B
P/E Ratio26.3x6.9x
Forward P/E17.3x9.0x
P/B2.87x1.34x
Dividend Yield2.19%
Beta1.460.33

Quantitative Metrics

MetricBLKACGL
DCF Fair Value$156.50$453.32
DCF Upside-84.7%+366.9%
Piotroski F3/95/9
Altman Z1.661.31
Beneish M-2.28
FCF Yield2.27%17.06%
Net Debt/EBITDA0.1x0.3x
ROIC3.9%5.1%
WACC13.2%7.7%
ROIC – WACC-9.3pp-2.6pp
Gross Margin46.7%
Net Margin22.9%22.8%
Rev Growth YoY18.7%14.0%
Sharpe (1Y)0.540.16
Max Drawdown 3Y-22.4%
FCF Payout Ratio94%1%

BLK Price

Loading chart...

ACGL Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

BLK found in:

IYF2.63%
XLF2.08%
VFH1.87%
MGV0.74%
VIG0.69%
VYM0.68%
SCHG0.58%
VTV0.58%
SPYV0.53%
VONV0.50%
IWD0.48%
QUS0.35%
SPLG0.27%
IVV0.26%
VONE0.25%
VOO0.25%
SCHX0.25%
SPY0.24%
ITOT0.23%
SCHB0.23%
SPTM0.22%
VTI0.21%
RSP0.20%
URTH0.18%
ACWI0.17%
VT0.14%
ONEO0.05%

ACGL found in:

KIE1.79%
ONEV0.96%
VOE0.57%
XLF0.47%
VFH0.41%
ONEO0.33%
VO0.32%
QUS0.21%
VFVA0.16%
VTV0.12%
SPYV0.12%
VONV0.10%
ESGV0.07%
SPLG0.05%
SPY0.05%
SPTM0.05%
VOO0.05%
VTI0.05%
VONE0.05%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

BLK vs ACGL: Head-to-Head Analysis

BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) and Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) represent two companies in the Financial Services sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, BLK leads 5–4 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, BLK generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 3.9% compared to ACGL's 5.1%. This suggests ACGL is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between BLK and ACGL is 0.140, indicating low correlation, making them an effective diversification pair in a portfolio context.

BLK appears in 27 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while ACGL appears in 19 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, BLK or ACGL?

Our quantitative analysis compares BLK and ACGL across nine fundamental dimensions. BLK wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are BLK and ACGL correlated?

The 252-day correlation between BLK and ACGL is 0.140. They have low correlation, offering good diversification.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.