Stock vs Stock Comparison

CoStar Group, Inc. vs Prologis, Inc.

CSGP wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4.

CSGP$33.40
PLD$141.82

🏆 Tale of the Tape

54
CSGPPLD
0.2%Profitability (Net Margin)37.9%
460.0xValuation (P/E)36.1x
-0.6%Efficiency (ROIC)3.9%
5/9Health (Piotroski F)4/9
5.0Safety (Altman Z)2.1
18.7%Growth (Rev YoY)7.2%
-1.87Risk (Sharpe 1Y)1.53
0.26xBalance Sheet (D/E)0.71x
0.28%FCF Yield

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.187
252-Day Correlation
0.053
126-Day Correlation

Low correlation — excellent diversification pair.

Fundamentals

MetricCSGPPLD
Market Cap$13.1B$133.8B
P/E Ratio460.0x36.1x
Forward P/E17.9x42.2x
P/B1.66x2.50x
Dividend Yield2.98%
Beta0.751.35

Quantitative Metrics

MetricCSGPPLD
DCF Fair Value$2.49
DCF Upside-93.3%
Piotroski F5/94/9
Altman Z5.042.10
Beneish M-2.07-2.29
FCF Yield0.28%
Net Debt/EBITDA-3.4x4.6x
ROIC-0.6%3.9%
WACC10.1%11.4%
ROIC – WACC-10.7pp-7.5pp
Gross Margin78.9%74.6%
Net Margin0.2%37.9%
Rev Growth YoY18.7%7.2%
Sharpe (1Y)-1.871.53
Max Drawdown 3Y-62.7%
FCF Payout Ratio

CSGP Price

Loading chart...

PLD Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

CSGP found in:

XLRE1.50%
IYR1.36%
VNQ0.77%
VOT0.34%
RSP0.18%
QQQ0.16%
VO0.15%
SCHV0.06%
SPLG0.05%
VUG0.05%
SPYV0.05%
IWD0.05%
IVV0.05%
ITOT0.04%
VONV0.04%
SCHX0.03%
ESGV0.03%
SCHB0.03%
ACWI0.03%
SPY0.02%
URTH0.02%
SPTM0.02%
VOO0.02%
VONG0.01%
IWF0.01%
ONEO0.01%
QUS0.00%

PLD found in:

IYR9.18%
XLRE9.15%
SCHH9.08%
VNQ6.99%
MGV0.65%
VTV0.51%
SPYV0.47%
SCHV0.45%
IWD0.40%
VONV0.40%
ESGV0.25%
SCHX0.21%
SPY0.21%
VOO0.21%
IVV0.20%
VONE0.20%
SCHB0.20%
SPTM0.20%
RSP0.20%
SPLG0.19%
VTI0.19%
ITOT0.18%
URTH0.15%
ACWI0.13%
VT0.12%
QUS0.09%
VFMV0.08%
ONEO0.07%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

CSGP vs PLD: Head-to-Head Analysis

CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) and Prologis, Inc. (PLD) represent two companies in the Real Estate sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, CSGP leads 5–4 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, CSGP generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of -0.6% compared to PLD's 3.9%. This suggests PLD is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between CSGP and PLD is 0.187, indicating low correlation, making them an effective diversification pair in a portfolio context.

CSGP appears in 27 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while PLD appears in 28 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, CSGP or PLD?

Our quantitative analysis compares CSGP and PLD across nine fundamental dimensions. CSGP wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are CSGP and PLD correlated?

The 252-day correlation between CSGP and PLD is 0.187. They have low correlation, offering good diversification.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.