Stock vs Stock Comparison

Kimco Realty Corporation vs Prologis, Inc.

PLD wins the Tale of the Tape 6–2.

KIM$23.77
PLD$141.82

🏆 Tale of the Tape

26
KIMPLD
27.3%Profitability (Net Margin)37.9%
27.7xValuation (P/E)36.1x
3.4%Efficiency (ROIC)3.9%
8/9Health (Piotroski F)4/9
1.3Safety (Altman Z)2.1
5.1%Growth (Rev YoY)7.2%
0.81Risk (Sharpe 1Y)1.53
0.86xBalance Sheet (D/E)0.71x

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.633
252-Day Correlation
0.574
126-Day Correlation

Moderately correlated — some diversification benefit from holding both.

Fundamentals

MetricKIMPLD
Market Cap$16.2B$133.8B
P/E Ratio27.7x36.1x
Forward P/E27.9x42.2x
P/B1.56x2.50x
Dividend Yield4.32%2.98%
Beta0.991.35

Quantitative Metrics

MetricKIMPLD
DCF Fair Value
DCF Upside
Piotroski F8/94/9
Altman Z1.282.10
Beneish M-2.62-2.29
FCF Yield
Net Debt/EBITDA5.6x4.6x
ROIC3.4%3.9%
WACC8.8%11.4%
ROIC – WACC-5.4pp-7.5pp
Gross Margin69.0%74.6%
Net Margin27.3%37.9%
Rev Growth YoY5.1%7.2%
Sharpe (1Y)0.811.53
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio

KIM Price

Loading chart...

PLD Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

KIM found in:

XLRE1.69%
SPYD1.37%
IYR1.21%
SCHH1.13%
VNQ0.85%
VBR0.36%
VB0.21%
RSP0.20%
ONEY0.15%
SPYV0.06%
SCHV0.05%
VONV0.05%
IWD0.05%
VOO0.03%
ESGV0.03%
SCHX0.03%
SPY0.03%
SPLG0.02%
SCHB0.02%
SPTM0.02%
IVV0.02%
ITOT0.02%
VTI0.02%
VONE0.02%
ONEO0.02%
URTH0.02%
QUS0.02%
ACWI0.01%

PLD found in:

IYR9.18%
XLRE9.15%
SCHH9.08%
VNQ6.99%
MGV0.65%
VTV0.51%
SPYV0.47%
SCHV0.45%
IWD0.40%
VONV0.40%
ESGV0.25%
SCHX0.21%
SPY0.21%
VOO0.21%
IVV0.20%
VONE0.20%
SCHB0.20%
SPTM0.20%
RSP0.20%
SPLG0.19%
VTI0.19%
ITOT0.18%
URTH0.15%
ACWI0.13%
VT0.12%
QUS0.09%
VFMV0.08%
ONEO0.07%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

KIM vs PLD: Head-to-Head Analysis

Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) and Prologis, Inc. (PLD) represent two companies in the Real Estate sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, PLD leads 6–2 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, KIM generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 3.4% compared to PLD's 3.9%. This suggests PLD is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between KIM and PLD is 0.633, indicating moderate co-movement, with some diversification value from holding both in a portfolio context.

KIM appears in 28 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while PLD appears in 28 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, KIM or PLD?

Our quantitative analysis compares KIM and PLD across nine fundamental dimensions. PLD wins the Tale of the Tape 6–2. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are KIM and PLD correlated?

The 252-day correlation between KIM and PLD is 0.633. They show moderate correlation — partially diversifying.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.