Stock vs Stock Comparison

Roku, Inc. vs Meta Platforms, Inc.

META wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4.

ROKU$122.20
META$622.98

🏆 Tale of the Tape

45
ROKUMETA
1.9%Profitability (Net Margin)30.1%
96.4xValuation (P/E)23.0x
2.4%Efficiency (ROIC)21.2%
6/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
6.4Safety (Altman Z)8.4
15.2%Growth (Rev YoY)22.2%
1.16Risk (Sharpe 1Y)0.27
0.67xBalance Sheet (D/E)0.68x
3.54%FCF Yield2.85%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.422
252-Day Correlation
0.394
126-Day Correlation

Moderately correlated — some diversification benefit from holding both.

Fundamentals

MetricROKUMETA
Market Cap$19.2B$1.61T
P/E Ratio96.4x23.0x
Forward P/E36.8x17.5x
P/B7.19x6.59x
Dividend Yield0.33%
Beta2.041.24

Quantitative Metrics

MetricROKUMETA
DCF Fair Value$125.09$450.05
DCF Upside+21.1%-29.1%
Piotroski F6/95/9
Altman Z6.368.44
Beneish M-2.77-3.01
FCF Yield3.54%2.85%
Net Debt/EBITDA0.2x
ROIC2.4%21.2%
WACC12.5%
ROIC – WACC8.7pp
Gross Margin43.8%82.0%
Net Margin1.9%30.1%
Rev Growth YoY15.2%22.2%
Sharpe (1Y)1.160.27
Max Drawdown 3Y-51.6%-34.2%
FCF Payout Ratio12%

ROKU Price

Loading chart...

META Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

ROKU found in:

ARKK4.29%
ARKW4.11%
IYZ3.72%
ARKF3.44%
VOX0.91%
VBK0.45%
VFQY0.22%
VB0.20%
VXF0.19%
ONEO0.09%
VONV0.04%
VTI0.02%
VONE0.02%
ESGV0.02%
VONG0.01%

META found in:

VOX20.32%
XLC13.46%
FDN8.68%
SCHG4.58%
IVW4.02%
MGK3.90%
VUG3.88%
QQQ3.86%
SPYG3.79%
QUAL3.49%
IWF3.46%
VONG3.31%
DGRW3.10%
JEPQ2.99%
OEF2.97%
IYW2.80%
SPLG2.77%
ESGV2.52%
ARKF2.46%
IVV2.46%
SCHX2.27%
XNTK2.18%
ITOT2.17%
VOO2.17%
SCHB2.12%
QUS2.11%
SPY2.08%
ARKW2.03%
VONE2.03%
IWB2.03%
LRGF1.97%
VTI1.93%
SPTM1.93%
DFAC1.88%
URTH1.64%
ACWI1.62%
VFMV1.30%
MOAT1.23%
VT1.19%
IWD0.73%
VONV0.73%
ARKK0.59%
RSP0.22%
ONEO0.06%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

ROKU vs META: Head-to-Head Analysis

Roku, Inc. (ROKU) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) represent two companies in the Communication Services sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, META leads 5–4 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, ROKU generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 2.4% compared to META's 21.2%. This suggests META is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between ROKU and META is 0.422, indicating moderate co-movement, with some diversification value from holding both in a portfolio context.

ROKU appears in 15 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while META appears in 44 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, ROKU or META?

Our quantitative analysis compares ROKU and META across nine fundamental dimensions. META wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are ROKU and META correlated?

The 252-day correlation between ROKU and META is 0.422. They show moderate correlation — partially diversifying.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.