Stock vs Stock Comparison

Waters Corporation vs Agilent Technologies, Inc.

A wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4.

WAT$379.77
A$137.40

🏆 Tale of the Tape

45
WATA
20.3%Profitability (Net Margin)18.8%
48.8xValuation (P/E)27.3x
17.0%Efficiency (ROIC)11.8%
4/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
11.7Safety (Altman Z)4.6
7.0%Growth (Rev YoY)6.7%
-0.05Risk (Sharpe 1Y)0.32
0.98xBalance Sheet (D/E)0.89x
1.70%FCF Yield3.41%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.731
252-Day Correlation
0.599
126-Day Correlation

Highly correlated — these stocks tend to move together. Limited diversification benefit.

Fundamentals

MetricWATA
Market Cap$37.7B$38.2B
P/E Ratio48.8x27.3x
Forward P/E23.4x20.5x
P/B8.92x5.37x
Dividend Yield0.75%
Beta1.141.22

Quantitative Metrics

MetricWATA
DCF Fair Value$48.56$50.34
DCF Upside-85.0%-57.1%
Piotroski F4/95/9
Altman Z11.744.57
Beneish M-2.38-2.46
FCF Yield1.70%3.41%
Net Debt/EBITDA0.3x0.7x
ROIC17.0%11.8%
WACC12.0%12.1%
ROIC – WACC5.0pp-0.3pp
Gross Margin59.3%52.4%
Net Margin20.3%18.8%
Rev Growth YoY7.0%6.7%
Sharpe (1Y)-0.050.32
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio24%

WAT Price

Loading chart...

A Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

WAT found in:

VOT0.71%
XLV0.62%
VHT0.49%
VO0.31%
RSP0.18%
VFQY0.18%
ONEV0.13%
SCHG0.12%
SPYV0.12%
ONEO0.08%
IWD0.07%
VUG0.06%
VONV0.06%
ESGV0.06%
VTV0.06%
QUS0.06%
SPY0.05%
SCHX0.05%
VONE0.05%
VOO0.05%
SPTM0.05%
SCHB0.05%
VTI0.04%
IVV0.04%
URTH0.04%
SPLG0.03%
ITOT0.03%
IWF0.03%
VONG0.03%
ACWI0.02%

A found in:

MOAT1.31%
VOT0.77%
XLV0.61%
VHT0.53%
VO0.33%
ONEV0.29%
RSP0.18%
VIG0.15%
VTV0.13%
SCHV0.12%
SPYV0.11%
IWD0.11%
VONV0.10%
ONEO0.09%
ESGV0.07%
QUS0.07%
SPLG0.07%
IVV0.07%
ITOT0.06%
SCHX0.06%
SCHB0.05%
SPY0.05%
VTI0.05%
VOO0.05%
VONE0.05%
SPTM0.05%
URTH0.04%
ACWI0.04%
DGRW0.04%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

WAT vs A: Head-to-Head Analysis

Waters Corporation (WAT) and Agilent Technologies, Inc. (A) represent two companies in the Healthcare sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, A leads 5–4 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, WAT generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 17.0% compared to A's 11.8%. This suggests WAT is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between WAT and A is 0.731, indicating these stocks move closely together, offering limited diversification benefit in a portfolio context.

WAT appears in 30 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while A appears in 29 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, WAT or A?

Our quantitative analysis compares WAT and A across nine fundamental dimensions. A wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are WAT and A correlated?

The 252-day correlation between WAT and A is 0.731. They are highly correlated, meaning they tend to move together.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.