Stock vs Stock Comparison

Aflac Incorporated vs Arch Capital Group Ltd.

ACGL wins the Tale of the Tape 7–2.

AFL$113.63
ACGL$87.62

🏆 Tale of the Tape

27
AFLACGL
21.0%Profitability (Net Margin)22.8%
12.8xValuation (P/E)6.9x
3.2%Efficiency (ROIC)5.1%
2/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
1.3Safety (Altman Z)1.3
-9.3%Growth (Rev YoY)14.0%
0.29Risk (Sharpe 1Y)0.16
2.95xBalance Sheet (D/E)2.27x
FCF Yield17.06%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.651
252-Day Correlation
0.642
126-Day Correlation

Moderately correlated — some diversification benefit from holding both.

Fundamentals

MetricAFLACGL
Market Cap$57.2B$31.2B
P/E Ratio12.8x6.9x
Forward P/E14.8x9.0x
P/B1.92x1.34x
Dividend Yield2.17%
Beta0.620.33

Quantitative Metrics

MetricAFLACGL
DCF Fair Value$453.32
DCF Upside+366.9%
Piotroski F2/95/9
Altman Z1.341.31
Beneish M
FCF Yield17.06%
Net Debt/EBITDA0.4x0.3x
ROIC3.2%5.1%
WACC8.3%7.7%
ROIC – WACC-5.1pp-2.6pp
Gross Margin
Net Margin21.0%22.8%
Rev Growth YoY-9.3%14.0%
Sharpe (1Y)0.290.16
Max Drawdown 3Y-22.4%
FCF Payout Ratio1%

AFL Price

Loading chart...

ACGL Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

AFL found in:

KIE1.90%
NOBL1.44%
SDY0.96%
XLF0.75%
VFH0.67%
VFVA0.47%
VOE0.47%
ONEV0.45%
VO0.27%
VIG0.24%
VYM0.22%
VTV0.21%
RSP0.20%
SPYV0.19%
SCHV0.18%
IWD0.17%
VONV0.16%
ONEO0.16%
MGV0.13%
VFMV0.10%
ESGV0.10%
VOO0.09%
IVV0.09%
SPLG0.09%
SPY0.09%
SCHX0.09%
ITOT0.08%
VONE0.08%
VTI0.08%
SCHB0.08%
SPTM0.08%
URTH0.07%
QUS0.06%
ACWI0.06%
VT0.05%

ACGL found in:

KIE1.79%
ONEV0.96%
VOE0.57%
XLF0.47%
VFH0.41%
ONEO0.33%
VO0.32%
QUS0.21%
VFVA0.16%
VTV0.12%
SPYV0.12%
VONV0.10%
ESGV0.07%
SPLG0.05%
SPY0.05%
SPTM0.05%
VOO0.05%
VTI0.05%
VONE0.05%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

AFL vs ACGL: Head-to-Head Analysis

Aflac Incorporated (AFL) and Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) represent two companies in the Financial Services sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, ACGL leads 7–2 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, AFL generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 3.2% compared to ACGL's 5.1%. This suggests ACGL is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between AFL and ACGL is 0.651, indicating moderate co-movement, with some diversification value from holding both in a portfolio context.

AFL appears in 35 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while ACGL appears in 19 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, AFL or ACGL?

Our quantitative analysis compares AFL and ACGL across nine fundamental dimensions. ACGL wins the Tale of the Tape 7–2. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are AFL and ACGL correlated?

The 252-day correlation between AFL and ACGL is 0.651. They show moderate correlation — partially diversifying.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.