Stock vs Stock Comparison

American Homes 4 Rent vs Prologis, Inc.

PLD wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4.

AMH$32.08
PLD$140.41

🏆 Tale of the Tape

45
AMHPLD
24.5%Profitability (Net Margin)37.9%
26.1xValuation (P/E)36.1x
4.4%Efficiency (ROIC)3.9%
8/9Health (Piotroski F)4/9
1.6Safety (Altman Z)2.1
7.0%Growth (Rev YoY)7.2%
-0.81Risk (Sharpe 1Y)1.53
0.72xBalance Sheet (D/E)0.71x
4.39%FCF Yield

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.393
252-Day Correlation
0.271
126-Day Correlation

Moderately correlated — some diversification benefit from holding both.

Fundamentals

MetricAMHPLD
Market Cap$13.2B$133.8B
P/E Ratio26.1x36.1x
Forward P/E47.9x42.2x
P/B1.68x2.50x
Dividend Yield4.11%2.98%
Beta0.831.35

Quantitative Metrics

MetricAMHPLD
DCF Fair Value$47.42
DCF Upside+59.4%
Piotroski F8/94/9
Altman Z1.572.10
Beneish M-2.71-2.29
FCF Yield4.39%
Net Debt/EBITDA3.8x4.6x
ROIC4.4%3.9%
WACC8.2%11.4%
ROIC – WACC-3.8pp-7.5pp
Gross Margin56.8%74.6%
Net Margin24.5%37.9%
Rev Growth YoY7.0%7.2%
Sharpe (1Y)-0.811.53
Max Drawdown 3Y-29.7%
FCF Payout Ratio62%

AMH Price

Loading chart...

PLD Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

AMH found in:

MDYV0.63%
VNQ0.56%
SPMD0.30%
MDY0.30%
VBR0.24%
VXF0.13%
VB0.13%
ONEY0.10%
ONEV0.09%
VONV0.03%
ONEO0.02%
ESGV0.02%
SPTM0.02%

PLD found in:

IYR9.18%
XLRE9.15%
SCHH9.08%
VNQ6.99%
MGV0.65%
VTV0.51%
SPYV0.47%
SCHV0.45%
IWD0.40%
VONV0.40%
ESGV0.25%
SCHX0.21%
SPY0.21%
VOO0.21%
IVV0.20%
VONE0.20%
SCHB0.20%
SPTM0.20%
RSP0.20%
SPLG0.19%
VTI0.19%
ITOT0.18%
URTH0.15%
ACWI0.13%
VT0.12%
QUS0.09%
VFMV0.08%
ONEO0.07%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

AMH vs PLD: Head-to-Head Analysis

American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) and Prologis, Inc. (PLD) represent two companies in the Real Estate sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, PLD leads 5–4 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, AMH generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 4.4% compared to PLD's 3.9%. This suggests AMH is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between AMH and PLD is 0.393, indicating moderate co-movement, with some diversification value from holding both in a portfolio context.

AMH appears in 13 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while PLD appears in 28 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, AMH or PLD?

Our quantitative analysis compares AMH and PLD across nine fundamental dimensions. PLD wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are AMH and PLD correlated?

The 252-day correlation between AMH and PLD is 0.393. They show moderate correlation — partially diversifying.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.