Stock vs Stock Comparison

Beyond Meat, Inc. vs Costco Wholesale Corporation

COST wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3.

BYND
COST$961.83

🏆 Tale of the Tape

36
BYNDCOST
64.6%Profitability (Net Margin)2.9%
Valuation (P/E)49.8x
34.1%Efficiency (ROIC)21.7%
3/9Health (Piotroski F)6/9
Safety (Altman Z)10.0
-15.6%Growth (Rev YoY)8.2%
Risk (Sharpe 1Y)-0.05
-617.60xBalance Sheet (D/E)1.64x
FCF Yield1.80%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Fundamentals

MetricBYNDCOST
Market Cap$424.1B
P/E Ratio49.8x
Forward P/E42.3x
P/B25.65x
Dividend Yield0.61%
Beta0.91

Quantitative Metrics

MetricBYNDCOST
DCF Fair Value$576.10
DCF Upside-41.3%
Piotroski F3/96/9
Altman Z10.02
Beneish M1.89-2.66
FCF Yield1.80%
Net Debt/EBITDA0.8x-0.6x
ROIC34.1%21.7%
WACC10.8%
ROIC – WACC10.9pp
Gross Margin2.8%12.8%
Net Margin64.6%2.9%
Rev Growth YoY-15.6%8.2%
Sharpe (1Y)-0.05
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio28%

BYND Price

Loading chart...

COST Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

BYND found in:

VDC0.05%

COST found in:

VDC12.27%
XLP9.78%
IYC4.26%
MGV2.23%
QQQ2.10%
VIG2.03%
SCHG1.70%
VFQY1.64%
SPYV1.62%
IWF1.60%
IVE1.58%
XRT1.51%
VONG1.45%
VFMV1.40%
VUG1.32%
QUS1.27%
ESGV0.89%
DGRW0.82%
VOO0.73%
SPY0.73%
SCHX0.72%
SPLG0.69%
VONE0.68%
SPTM0.67%
SCHB0.67%
IVV0.65%
VTI0.65%
ITOT0.58%
URTH0.52%
ACWI0.43%
VT0.40%
SDY0.23%
RSP0.21%
GWX0.11%
ONEO0.04%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

BYND vs COST: Head-to-Head Analysis

Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) represent two companies in the Consumer Defensive sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, COST leads 6–3 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, BYND generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 34.1% compared to COST's 21.7%. This suggests BYND is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

BYND appears in 1 ETF tracked by SecuritiesDB, while COST appears in 35 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, BYND or COST?

Our quantitative analysis compares BYND and COST across nine fundamental dimensions. COST wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are BYND and COST correlated?

Correlation data is not yet available for this pair. Check back after both stocks have sufficient trading history.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.