Stock vs Stock Comparison

CubeSmart vs Prologis, Inc.

PLD wins the Tale of the Tape 5–3.

CUBE$39.43
PLD$140.41

🏆 Tale of the Tape

35
CUBEPLD
29.7%Profitability (Net Margin)37.9%
28.0xValuation (P/E)36.1x
6.0%Efficiency (ROIC)3.9%
6/9Health (Piotroski F)4/9
1.3Safety (Altman Z)2.1
5.3%Growth (Rev YoY)7.2%
0.18Risk (Sharpe 1Y)1.53
1.39xBalance Sheet (D/E)0.71x

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.582
252-Day Correlation
0.505
126-Day Correlation

Moderately correlated — some diversification benefit from holding both.

Fundamentals

MetricCUBEPLD
Market Cap$9.1B$133.8B
P/E Ratio28.0x36.1x
Forward P/E26.9x42.2x
P/B3.42x2.50x
Dividend Yield5.30%2.98%
Beta1.111.35

Quantitative Metrics

MetricCUBEPLD
DCF Fair Value
DCF Upside
Piotroski F6/94/9
Altman Z1.322.10
Beneish M-2.84-2.29
FCF Yield
Net Debt/EBITDA4.3x4.6x
ROIC6.0%3.9%
WACC9.8%11.4%
ROIC – WACC-3.8pp-7.5pp
Gross Margin68.7%74.6%
Net Margin29.7%37.9%
Rev Growth YoY5.3%7.2%
Sharpe (1Y)0.181.53
Max Drawdown 3Y-31.9%
FCF Payout Ratio

CUBE Price

Loading chart...

PLD Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

CUBE found in:

VNQ0.48%
MDYV0.30%
ONEY0.28%
SPMD0.27%
MDY0.26%
MDYG0.23%
VBR0.21%
ONEV0.20%
VB0.12%
VXF0.11%
ONEO0.06%
SPTM0.01%

PLD found in:

IYR9.18%
XLRE9.15%
SCHH9.08%
VNQ6.99%
MGV0.65%
VTV0.51%
SPYV0.47%
SCHV0.45%
IWD0.40%
VONV0.40%
ESGV0.25%
SCHX0.21%
SPY0.21%
VOO0.21%
IVV0.20%
VONE0.20%
SCHB0.20%
SPTM0.20%
RSP0.20%
SPLG0.19%
VTI0.19%
ITOT0.18%
URTH0.15%
ACWI0.13%
VT0.12%
QUS0.09%
VFMV0.08%
ONEO0.07%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

CUBE vs PLD: Head-to-Head Analysis

CubeSmart (CUBE) and Prologis, Inc. (PLD) represent two companies in the Real Estate sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, PLD leads 5–3 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, CUBE generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 6.0% compared to PLD's 3.9%. This suggests CUBE is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between CUBE and PLD is 0.582, indicating moderate co-movement, with some diversification value from holding both in a portfolio context.

CUBE appears in 12 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while PLD appears in 28 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, CUBE or PLD?

Our quantitative analysis compares CUBE and PLD across nine fundamental dimensions. PLD wins the Tale of the Tape 5–3. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are CUBE and PLD correlated?

The 252-day correlation between CUBE and PLD is 0.582. They show moderate correlation — partially diversifying.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.