Stock vs Stock Comparison

Fabrinet vs Microsoft Corporation

MSFT wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4.

FN$701.11
MSFT$441.31

🏆 Tale of the Tape

45
FNMSFT
9.7%Profitability (Net Margin)36.1%
56.2xValuation (P/E)26.8x
13.9%Efficiency (ROIC)20.8%
2/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
20.1Safety (Altman Z)7.8
18.6%Growth (Rev YoY)14.9%
2.24Risk (Sharpe 1Y)-0.11
0.43xBalance Sheet (D/E)0.80x
0.88%FCF Yield2.59%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.262
252-Day Correlation
0.173
126-Day Correlation

Low correlation — excellent diversification pair.

Fundamentals

MetricFNMSFT
Market Cap$23.4B$3.34T
P/E Ratio56.2x26.8x
Forward P/E37.9x23.3x
P/B10.17x8.07x
Dividend Yield0.81%
Beta1.221.09

Quantitative Metrics

MetricFNMSFT
DCF Fair Value$192.05$120.75
DCF Upside-72.2%-68.6%
Piotroski F2/95/9
Altman Z20.107.76
Beneish M-2.25-2.57
FCF Yield0.88%2.59%
Net Debt/EBITDA0.1x
ROIC13.9%20.8%
WACC11.5%
ROIC – WACC9.3pp
Gross Margin12.1%68.8%
Net Margin9.7%36.1%
Rev Growth YoY18.6%14.9%
Sharpe (1Y)2.24-0.11
Max Drawdown 3Y-37.5%-33.9%
FCF Payout Ratio34%

FN Price

Loading chart...

MSFT Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

FN found in:

IWO1.45%
MDYG1.42%
IJK1.41%
VTWO0.74%
SPMD0.73%
MDY0.73%
VBK0.72%
IJH0.72%
VB0.31%
VXF0.30%
VFMO0.24%
VGT0.17%
ESGV0.04%
VTI0.04%
SPTM0.04%

MSFT found in:

VGT10.02%
IVW9.10%
SPYG8.88%
IWF8.82%
IGV8.79%
VUG8.76%
VONG8.69%
MGK8.69%
XLK8.48%
SCHG7.34%
QQQ7.17%
SPLG6.84%
OEF6.73%
IVV6.14%
DGRW6.07%
ESGV5.53%
ITOT5.43%
DIA5.13%
QUAL5.04%
JEPQ4.91%
VOO4.90%
SPY4.87%
SCHX4.69%
VONE4.60%
IWB4.59%
LRGF4.52%
SPTM4.50%
SCHB4.39%
VTI4.36%
IYW3.99%
VIG3.96%
DFAC3.92%
URTH3.24%
ACWI3.17%
DGRO2.91%
VT2.69%
QUS2.65%
MOAT2.37%
XNTK2.02%
CLOU1.97%
USMV1.56%
VFMV1.40%
XSW0.73%
SDY0.41%
RSP0.18%
ONEO0.10%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

FN vs MSFT: Head-to-Head Analysis

Fabrinet (FN) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) represent two companies in the Technology sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, MSFT leads 5–4 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, FN generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 13.9% compared to MSFT's 20.8%. This suggests MSFT is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between FN and MSFT is 0.262, indicating low correlation, making them an effective diversification pair in a portfolio context.

FN appears in 15 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while MSFT appears in 46 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, FN or MSFT?

Our quantitative analysis compares FN and MSFT across nine fundamental dimensions. MSFT wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are FN and MSFT correlated?

The 252-day correlation between FN and MSFT is 0.262. They have low correlation, offering good diversification.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.