Stock vs Stock Comparison

Lam Research Corporation vs Microsoft Corporation

LRCX wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4.

LRCX$334.41
MSFT$441.31

🏆 Tale of the Tape

54
LRCXMSFT
29.1%Profitability (Net Margin)36.1%
60.3xValuation (P/E)26.8x
32.8%Efficiency (ROIC)20.8%
7/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
21.5Safety (Altman Z)7.8
23.7%Growth (Rev YoY)14.9%
2.89Risk (Sharpe 1Y)-0.11
1.16xBalance Sheet (D/E)0.80x
1.65%FCF Yield2.59%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.178
252-Day Correlation
0.105
126-Day Correlation

Low correlation — excellent diversification pair.

Fundamentals

MetricLRCXMSFT
Market Cap$397.9B$3.34T
P/E Ratio60.3x26.8x
Forward P/E40.1x23.3x
P/B37.59x8.07x
Dividend Yield0.33%0.81%
Beta1.821.09

Quantitative Metrics

MetricLRCXMSFT
DCF Fair Value$34.66$120.75
DCF Upside-87.0%-68.6%
Piotroski F7/95/9
Altman Z21.467.76
Beneish M-2.34-2.57
FCF Yield1.65%2.59%
Net Debt/EBITDA-0.4x0.1x
ROIC32.8%20.8%
WACC15.6%11.5%
ROIC – WACC17.2pp9.3pp
Gross Margin48.7%68.8%
Net Margin29.1%36.1%
Rev Growth YoY23.7%14.9%
Sharpe (1Y)2.89-0.11
Max Drawdown 3Y-33.9%
FCF Payout Ratio21%34%

LRCX Price

Loading chart...

MSFT Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

LRCX found in:

SMH4.75%
XNTK4.34%
SOXX4.30%
RDVY3.70%
MTUM3.61%
QUAL3.22%
XLK2.51%
VFQY1.71%
VGT1.48%
VIG1.45%
MGK1.32%
QQQ1.18%
VFMV1.18%
VFMO1.08%
SPYG1.08%
VONG1.04%
QUS1.04%
SCHV0.99%
IWF0.97%
VUG0.95%
ONEO0.68%
SPY0.59%
SPTM0.55%
ESGV0.54%
VOO0.52%
VONE0.49%
SCHX0.47%
VTI0.46%
SCHB0.44%
DGRW0.38%
IVV0.37%
SPLG0.35%
URTH0.34%
ITOT0.32%
ACWI0.31%
VT0.29%
RSP0.27%

MSFT found in:

VGT10.02%
IVW9.10%
SPYG8.88%
IWF8.82%
IGV8.79%
VUG8.76%
VONG8.69%
MGK8.69%
XLK8.48%
SCHG7.34%
QQQ7.17%
SPLG6.84%
OEF6.73%
IVV6.14%
DGRW6.07%
ESGV5.53%
ITOT5.43%
DIA5.13%
QUAL5.04%
JEPQ4.91%
VOO4.90%
SPY4.87%
SCHX4.69%
VONE4.60%
IWB4.59%
LRGF4.52%
SPTM4.50%
SCHB4.39%
VTI4.36%
IYW3.99%
VIG3.96%
DFAC3.92%
URTH3.24%
ACWI3.17%
DGRO2.91%
VT2.69%
QUS2.65%
MOAT2.37%
XNTK2.02%
CLOU1.97%
USMV1.56%
VFMV1.40%
XSW0.73%
SDY0.41%
RSP0.18%
ONEO0.10%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

LRCX vs MSFT: Head-to-Head Analysis

Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) represent two companies in the Technology sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, LRCX leads 5–4 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, LRCX generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 32.8% compared to MSFT's 20.8%. This suggests LRCX is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between LRCX and MSFT is 0.178, indicating low correlation, making them an effective diversification pair in a portfolio context.

LRCX appears in 37 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while MSFT appears in 46 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, LRCX or MSFT?

Our quantitative analysis compares LRCX and MSFT across nine fundamental dimensions. LRCX wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are LRCX and MSFT correlated?

The 252-day correlation between LRCX and MSFT is 0.178. They have low correlation, offering good diversification.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.