MetLife, Inc. vs Arch Capital Group Ltd.
ACGL wins the Tale of the Tape 9–0.
🏆 Tale of the Tape
Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).
Rolling Correlation
Moderately correlated — some diversification benefit from holding both.
Fundamentals
| Metric | MET | ACGL |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $53.2B | $31.2B |
| P/E Ratio | 16.0x | 6.9x |
| Forward P/E | 7.5x | 9.0x |
| P/B | 1.96x | 1.34x |
| Dividend Yield | 2.87% | — |
| Beta | 0.78 | 0.33 |
Quantitative Metrics
| Metric | MET | ACGL |
|---|---|---|
| DCF Fair Value | — | $453.32 |
| DCF Upside | — | +366.9% |
| Piotroski F | 4/9 | 5/9 |
| Altman Z | 0.25 | 1.31 |
| Beneish M | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | 17.06% |
| Net Debt/EBITDA | -0.5x | 0.3x |
| ROIC | 0.6% | 5.1% |
| WACC | 7.9% | 7.7% |
| ROIC – WACC | -7.3pp | -2.6pp |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | 4.5% | 22.8% |
| Rev Growth YoY | 7.9% | 14.0% |
| Sharpe (1Y) | 0.05 | 0.16 |
| Max Drawdown 3Y | — | -22.4% |
| FCF Payout Ratio | — | 1% |
MET Price
ACGL Price
ETF Exposure
More Comparisons
Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.
MET vs ACGL: Head-to-Head Analysis
MetLife, Inc. (MET) and Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) represent two companies in the Financial Services sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, ACGL leads 9–0 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.
In terms of capital efficiency, MET generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 0.6% compared to ACGL's 5.1%. This suggests ACGL is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.
The 252-day rolling correlation between MET and ACGL is 0.384, indicating moderate co-movement, with some diversification value from holding both in a portfolio context.
MET appears in 31 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while ACGL appears in 19 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which stock is the better investment, MET or ACGL?
Our quantitative analysis compares MET and ACGL across nine fundamental dimensions. ACGL wins the Tale of the Tape 9–0. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.
Are MET and ACGL correlated?
The 252-day correlation between MET and ACGL is 0.384. They show moderate correlation — partially diversifying.
How is the Tale of the Tape scored?
The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.