Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. vs BHP Group Limited
MLM wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4.
🏆 Tale of the Tape
Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).
Rolling Correlation
Low correlation — excellent diversification pair.
Fundamentals
| Metric | MLM | BHP |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $34.9B | $225.9B |
| P/E Ratio | 36.5x | 22.1x |
| Forward P/E | 25.3x | 16.7x |
| P/B | 3.09x | 4.48x |
| Dividend Yield | 0.57% | 2.99% |
| Beta | 1.14 | 0.80 |
Quantitative Metrics
| Metric | MLM | BHP |
|---|---|---|
| DCF Fair Value | $400.23 | $19.51 |
| DCF Upside | -37.0% | -75.0% |
| Piotroski F | 8/9 | 4/9 |
| Altman Z | 3.85 | 3.78 |
| Beneish M | -2.67 | -2.88 |
| FCF Yield | 2.26% | 4.57% |
| Net Debt/EBITDA | 2.5x | 0.3x |
| ROIC | 6.5% | 17.2% |
| WACC | 11.1% | 9.2% |
| ROIC – WACC | -4.7pp | 7.9pp |
| Gross Margin | 30.7% | 71.7% |
| Net Margin | 18.5% | 17.6% |
| Rev Growth YoY | 8.6% | -7.9% |
| Sharpe (1Y) | 1.09 | 2.01 |
| Max Drawdown 3Y | — | -37.2% |
| FCF Payout Ratio | 20% | 69% |
MLM Price
BHP Price
ETF Exposure
More Comparisons
Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.
MLM vs BHP: Head-to-Head Analysis
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MLM) and BHP Group Limited (BHP) represent two companies in the Basic Materials sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, MLM leads 5–4 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.
In terms of capital efficiency, MLM generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 6.5% compared to BHP's 17.2%. This suggests BHP is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.
The 252-day rolling correlation between MLM and BHP is 0.265, indicating low correlation, making them an effective diversification pair in a portfolio context.
MLM appears in 28 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while BHP appears in 8 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which stock is the better investment, MLM or BHP?
Our quantitative analysis compares MLM and BHP across nine fundamental dimensions. MLM wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.
Are MLM and BHP correlated?
The 252-day correlation between MLM and BHP is 0.265. They have low correlation, offering good diversification.
How is the Tale of the Tape scored?
The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.