Stock vs Stock Comparison

Natera, Inc. vs AbbVie Inc.

ABBV wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3.

NTRA$212.73
ABBV$215.40

🏆 Tale of the Tape

36
NTRAABBV
-9.0%Profitability (Net Margin)6.9%
Valuation (P/E)106.2x
-10.7%Efficiency (ROIC)8.3%
4/9Health (Piotroski F)7/9
23.4Safety (Altman Z)2.0
35.9%Growth (Rev YoY)8.6%
0.80Risk (Sharpe 1Y)0.61
0.40xBalance Sheet (D/E)-42.50x
0.29%FCF Yield4.23%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.163
252-Day Correlation
0.132
126-Day Correlation

Low correlation — excellent diversification pair.

Fundamentals

MetricNTRAABBV
Market Cap$32.0B$384.7B
P/E Ratio106.2x
Forward P/E-590.7x13.4x
P/B18.22x-57.80x
Dividend Yield3.18%
Beta1.570.30

Quantitative Metrics

MetricNTRAABBV
DCF Fair Value$26.96$126.26
DCF Upside-86.7%-38.9%
Piotroski F4/97/9
Altman Z23.442.01
Beneish M0.48-2.87
FCF Yield0.29%4.23%
Net Debt/EBITDA3.0x
ROIC-10.7%8.3%
WACC7.4%
ROIC – WACC0.8pp
Gross Margin64.8%70.2%
Net Margin-9.0%6.9%
Rev Growth YoY35.9%8.6%
Sharpe (1Y)0.800.61
Max Drawdown 3Y-39.9%
FCF Payout Ratio65%

NTRA Price

Loading chart...

ABBV Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

NTRA found in:

ARKG4.25%
IBB2.51%
ARKK1.25%
XBI1.20%
VBK0.80%
VHT0.44%
VXF0.35%
VB0.35%
VFMO0.11%
VONG0.09%
ONEO0.09%
ESGV0.05%
VTI0.04%
VONE0.04%
QUS0.00%

ABBV found in:

XLV7.07%
IYH6.86%
VHT6.04%
HDV5.61%
SCHD3.53%
DGRO2.52%
DGRW1.99%
MGV1.85%
VIG1.68%
VYM1.56%
NOBL1.49%
VTV1.46%
SDY1.42%
IWF1.39%
SCHV1.38%
VONG1.21%
XBI1.09%
ESGV0.78%
SPYV0.71%
IVV0.69%
SPLG0.68%
SCHX0.66%
SCHB0.62%
ITOT0.61%
VOO0.60%
SPY0.59%
VONE0.57%
SPTM0.55%
VTI0.54%
SPYG0.50%
URTH0.48%
ACWI0.41%
VFVA0.41%
VT0.33%
QUS0.32%
VFMV0.25%
RSP0.19%
ONEO0.03%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

NTRA vs ABBV: Head-to-Head Analysis

Natera, Inc. (NTRA) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) represent two companies in the Healthcare sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, ABBV leads 6–3 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, NTRA generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of -10.7% compared to ABBV's 8.3%. This suggests ABBV is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between NTRA and ABBV is 0.163, indicating low correlation, making them an effective diversification pair in a portfolio context.

NTRA appears in 15 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while ABBV appears in 38 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, NTRA or ABBV?

Our quantitative analysis compares NTRA and ABBV across nine fundamental dimensions. ABBV wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are NTRA and ABBV correlated?

The 252-day correlation between NTRA and ABBV is 0.163. They have low correlation, offering good diversification.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.