Stock vs Stock Comparison

Ambev S.A. vs Costco Wholesale Corporation

COST wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3.

ABEV
COST$961.83

🏆 Tale of the Tape

36
ABEVCOST
17.6%Profitability (Net Margin)2.9%
Valuation (P/E)49.8x
17.6%Efficiency (ROIC)21.7%
7/9Health (Piotroski F)6/9
Safety (Altman Z)10.0
-1.4%Growth (Rev YoY)8.2%
Risk (Sharpe 1Y)-0.05
0.63xBalance Sheet (D/E)1.64x
FCF Yield1.80%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Fundamentals

MetricABEVCOST
Market Cap$424.1B
P/E Ratio49.8x
Forward P/E42.3x
P/B25.65x
Dividend Yield0.61%
Beta0.91

Quantitative Metrics

MetricABEVCOST
DCF Fair Value$29.49$576.10
DCF Upside-41.3%
Piotroski F7/96/9
Altman Z10.02
Beneish M-2.74-2.66
FCF Yield1.80%
Net Debt/EBITDA-0.6x-0.6x
ROIC17.6%21.7%
WACC10.8%
ROIC – WACC10.9pp
Gross Margin51.4%12.8%
Net Margin17.6%2.9%
Rev Growth YoY-1.4%8.2%
Sharpe (1Y)-0.05
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio103%28%

ABEV Price

Loading chart...

COST Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

ABEV found in:

SPEM0.10%
CWI0.06%

COST found in:

VDC12.27%
XLP9.78%
IYC4.26%
MGV2.23%
QQQ2.10%
VIG2.03%
SCHG1.70%
VFQY1.64%
SPYV1.62%
IWF1.60%
IVE1.58%
XRT1.51%
VONG1.45%
VFMV1.40%
VUG1.32%
QUS1.27%
ESGV0.89%
DGRW0.82%
VOO0.73%
SPY0.73%
SCHX0.72%
SPLG0.69%
VONE0.68%
SPTM0.67%
SCHB0.67%
IVV0.65%
VTI0.65%
ITOT0.58%
URTH0.52%
ACWI0.43%
VT0.40%
SDY0.23%
RSP0.21%
GWX0.11%
ONEO0.04%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

ABEV vs COST: Head-to-Head Analysis

Ambev S.A. (ABEV) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) represent two companies in the Consumer Defensive sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, COST leads 6–3 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, ABEV generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 17.6% compared to COST's 21.7%. This suggests COST is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

ABEV appears in 2 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while COST appears in 35 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, ABEV or COST?

Our quantitative analysis compares ABEV and COST across nine fundamental dimensions. COST wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are ABEV and COST correlated?

Correlation data is not yet available for this pair. Check back after both stocks have sufficient trading history.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.