Stock vs Stock Comparison

Lam Research Corporation vs NVIDIA Corporation

NVDA wins the Tale of the Tape 7–2.

LRCX$343.71
NVDA$214.75

🏆 Tale of the Tape

27
LRCXNVDA
29.1%Profitability (Net Margin)55.6%
60.3xValuation (P/E)32.4x
32.8%Efficiency (ROIC)64.1%
7/9Health (Piotroski F)4/9
21.5Safety (Altman Z)60.4
23.7%Growth (Rev YoY)65.5%
2.89Risk (Sharpe 1Y)1.48
1.16xBalance Sheet (D/E)0.31x
1.65%FCF Yield2.11%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.568
252-Day Correlation
0.567
126-Day Correlation

Moderately correlated — some diversification benefit from holding both.

Fundamentals

MetricLRCXNVDA
Market Cap$397.9B$5.11T
P/E Ratio60.3x32.4x
Forward P/E40.1x16.7x
P/B37.59x32.62x
Dividend Yield0.33%0.47%
Beta1.822.24

Quantitative Metrics

MetricLRCXNVDA
DCF Fair Value$34.66$56.04
DCF Upside-87.0%-70.4%
Piotroski F7/94/9
Altman Z21.4660.40
Beneish M-2.34-1.14
FCF Yield1.65%2.11%
Net Debt/EBITDA-0.4x-0.0x
ROIC32.8%64.1%
WACC15.6%19.0%
ROIC – WACC17.2pp45.1pp
Gross Margin48.7%71.1%
Net Margin29.1%55.6%
Rev Growth YoY23.7%65.5%
Sharpe (1Y)2.891.48
Max Drawdown 3Y-36.9%
FCF Payout Ratio21%1%

LRCX Price

Loading chart...

NVDA Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

LRCX found in:

SMH4.75%
XNTK4.34%
SOXX4.30%
RDVY3.70%
MTUM3.61%
QUAL3.22%
XLK2.51%
VFQY1.71%
VGT1.48%
VIG1.45%
MGK1.32%
QQQ1.18%
VFMV1.18%
VFMO1.08%
SPYG1.08%
VONG1.04%
QUS1.04%
SCHV0.99%
IWF0.97%
VUG0.95%
ONEO0.68%
SPY0.59%
SPTM0.55%
ESGV0.54%
VOO0.52%
VONE0.49%
SCHX0.47%
VTI0.46%
SCHB0.44%
DGRW0.38%
IVV0.37%
SPLG0.35%
URTH0.34%
ITOT0.32%
ACWI0.31%
VT0.29%
RSP0.27%

NVDA found in:

SMH21.05%
VGT18.59%
IYW16.23%
SPYG15.22%
IVW14.57%
XLK14.54%
MGK13.77%
VUG13.33%
VONG13.22%
IWF12.92%
SCHG10.83%
OEF10.78%
BOTZ9.95%
QQQ9.03%
SPLG8.58%
SPY8.35%
SOXX8.26%
ESGV8.22%
VOO7.85%
JEPQ7.76%
IVV7.74%
SPTM7.72%
LRGF7.51%
VONE7.10%
IWB7.09%
SCHX6.91%
ITOT6.85%
VTI6.63%
QUAL6.50%
SCHB6.47%
DGRW5.71%
DFAC5.61%
URTH5.04%
ACWI4.84%
MTUM4.64%
VT4.15%
XNTK2.89%
QUS2.79%
DIA2.69%
ARKX2.53%
ARKQ2.41%
XSD1.87%
USMV1.64%
JEPI1.59%
ARKF1.51%
VFMV1.41%
ARKK1.29%
MOAT1.25%
ARKW1.12%
VFQY0.54%
ONEO0.22%
RSP0.20%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

LRCX vs NVDA: Head-to-Head Analysis

Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) represent two companies in the Technology sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, NVDA leads 7–2 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, LRCX generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 32.8% compared to NVDA's 64.1%. This suggests NVDA is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between LRCX and NVDA is 0.568, indicating moderate co-movement, with some diversification value from holding both in a portfolio context.

LRCX appears in 37 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while NVDA appears in 52 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, LRCX or NVDA?

Our quantitative analysis compares LRCX and NVDA across nine fundamental dimensions. NVDA wins the Tale of the Tape 7–2. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are LRCX and NVDA correlated?

The 252-day correlation between LRCX and NVDA is 0.568. They show moderate correlation — partially diversifying.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.