Stock vs Stock Comparison

Las Vegas Sands Corp. vs Airbnb, Inc.

LVS wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4.

LVS$50.86
ABNB$133.59

🏆 Tale of the Tape

54
LVSABNB
12.5%Profitability (Net Margin)20.5%
18.7xValuation (P/E)32.9x
13.2%Efficiency (ROIC)23.5%
7/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
2.4Safety (Altman Z)4.2
15.2%Growth (Rev YoY)10.3%
1.43Risk (Sharpe 1Y)0.23
10.33xBalance Sheet (D/E)1.71x
3.81%FCF Yield

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.328
252-Day Correlation
0.203
126-Day Correlation

Moderately correlated — some diversification benefit from holding both.

Fundamentals

MetricLVSABNB
Market Cap$33.5B$79.1B
P/E Ratio18.7x32.9x
Forward P/E13.7x22.1x
P/B27.99x10.39x
Dividend Yield2.18%
Beta0.841.21

Quantitative Metrics

MetricLVSABNB
DCF Fair Value$16.25
DCF Upside-70.4%
Piotroski F7/95/9
Altman Z2.434.17
Beneish M-2.17-2.87
FCF Yield3.81%
Net Debt/EBITDA2.4x
ROIC13.2%23.5%
WACC8.5%
ROIC – WACC4.7pp
Gross Margin49.8%83.0%
Net Margin12.5%20.5%
Rev Growth YoY15.2%10.3%
Sharpe (1Y)1.430.23
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio47%

LVS Price

Loading chart...

ABNB Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

LVS found in:

VOT0.39%
XLY0.34%
VCR0.29%
ONEY0.24%
VO0.17%
RSP0.15%
VFMO0.08%
VYM0.07%
VUG0.06%
IWF0.06%
SCHV0.06%
ONEO0.05%
VONG0.05%
SPYG0.04%
DGRW0.04%
IVV0.03%
SPLG0.03%
ITOT0.03%
VONE0.03%
VOO0.03%
SCHX0.03%
SCHB0.03%
SPY0.02%
URTH0.02%
SPTM0.02%
VTI0.02%
ACWI0.02%
QUS0.01%

ABNB found in:

MOAT2.72%
ARKF1.68%
VFQY1.37%
XLY1.30%
VCR0.93%
VFMV0.93%
ARKW0.50%
MGK0.38%
QQQ0.32%
SCHG0.22%
RSP0.20%
IWF0.19%
VONG0.19%
VUG0.17%
ONEO0.13%
ESGV0.11%
SPYV0.10%
VOO0.10%
IVV0.10%
SPLG0.09%
SCHX0.09%
VONE0.09%
SPY0.09%
ITOT0.09%
SCHB0.09%
SPTM0.09%
VTI0.08%
SPYG0.08%
URTH0.07%
ACWI0.06%
VT0.05%
QUS0.03%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

LVS vs ABNB: Head-to-Head Analysis

Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) and Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) represent two companies in the Consumer Cyclical sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, LVS leads 5–4 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, LVS generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 13.2% compared to ABNB's 23.5%. This suggests ABNB is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between LVS and ABNB is 0.328, indicating moderate co-movement, with some diversification value from holding both in a portfolio context.

LVS appears in 28 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while ABNB appears in 32 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, LVS or ABNB?

Our quantitative analysis compares LVS and ABNB across nine fundamental dimensions. LVS wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are LVS and ABNB correlated?

The 252-day correlation between LVS and ABNB is 0.328. They show moderate correlation — partially diversifying.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.