Stock vs Stock Comparison

Morgan Stanley vs Arch Capital Group Ltd.

ACGL wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3.

MS$210.14
ACGL$87.89

🏆 Tale of the Tape

36
MSACGL
25.6%Profitability (Net Margin)22.8%
18.8xValuation (P/E)6.9x
Efficiency (ROIC)5.1%
3/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
0.3Safety (Altman Z)1.3
14.5%Growth (Rev YoY)14.0%
1.92Risk (Sharpe 1Y)0.16
11.61xBalance Sheet (D/E)2.27x
-3.78%FCF Yield17.06%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.017
252-Day Correlation
-0.128
126-Day Correlation

Low correlation — excellent diversification pair.

Fundamentals

MetricMSACGL
Market Cap$328.1B$31.2B
P/E Ratio18.8x6.9x
Forward P/E16.4x9.0x
P/B3.14x1.34x
Dividend Yield1.92%
Beta1.210.33

Quantitative Metrics

MetricMSACGL
DCF Fair Value$453.32
DCF Upside+366.9%
Piotroski F3/95/9
Altman Z0.291.31
Beneish M
FCF Yield-3.78%17.06%
Net Debt/EBITDA0.3x
ROIC5.1%
WACC7.6%7.7%
ROIC – WACC-2.6pp
Gross Margin
Net Margin25.6%22.8%
Rev Growth YoY14.5%14.0%
Sharpe (1Y)1.920.16
Max Drawdown 3Y-22.4%
FCF Payout Ratio1%

MS Price

Loading chart...

ACGL Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

MS found in:

IYF3.50%
XLF3.27%
VFH2.69%
MGV1.13%
VFMV1.07%
VIG1.03%
VYM0.90%
VTV0.88%
SCHV0.68%
VONV0.66%
IWD0.61%
SPYG0.42%
ESGV0.38%
SPY0.38%
VFMO0.37%
VOO0.37%
IVV0.37%
SPTM0.35%
SPLG0.34%
VONE0.33%
VTI0.33%
SPYV0.33%
ITOT0.32%
SCHX0.32%
SCHB0.30%
URTH0.23%
ACWI0.22%
RSP0.20%
VT0.19%
QUS0.19%
ONEO0.01%

ACGL found in:

KIE1.79%
ONEV0.96%
VOE0.57%
XLF0.47%
VFH0.41%
ONEO0.33%
VO0.32%
QUS0.21%
VFVA0.16%
VTV0.12%
SPYV0.12%
VONV0.10%
ESGV0.07%
SPLG0.05%
SPY0.05%
SPTM0.05%
VOO0.05%
VTI0.05%
VONE0.05%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

MS vs ACGL: Head-to-Head Analysis

Morgan Stanley (MS) and Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) represent two companies in the Financial Services sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, ACGL leads 6–3 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

The 252-day rolling correlation between MS and ACGL is 0.017, indicating low correlation, making them an effective diversification pair in a portfolio context.

MS appears in 31 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while ACGL appears in 19 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, MS or ACGL?

Our quantitative analysis compares MS and ACGL across nine fundamental dimensions. ACGL wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are MS and ACGL correlated?

The 252-day correlation between MS and ACGL is 0.017. They have low correlation, offering good diversification.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.