Stock vs Stock Comparison

M&T Bank Corporation vs Arch Capital Group Ltd.

ACGL wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3.

MTB$214.03
ACGL$87.89

🏆 Tale of the Tape

36
MTBACGL
29.6%Profitability (Net Margin)22.8%
12.1xValuation (P/E)6.9x
Efficiency (ROIC)5.1%
7/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
0.3Safety (Altman Z)1.3
4.3%Growth (Rev YoY)14.0%
1.22Risk (Sharpe 1Y)0.16
6.32xBalance Sheet (D/E)2.27x
11.48%FCF Yield17.06%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.277
252-Day Correlation
0.296
126-Day Correlation

Low correlation — excellent diversification pair.

Fundamentals

MetricMTBACGL
Market Cap$31.6B$31.2B
P/E Ratio12.1x6.9x
Forward P/E10.4x9.0x
P/B1.24x1.34x
Dividend Yield2.78%
Beta0.590.33

Quantitative Metrics

MetricMTBACGL
DCF Fair Value$300.16$453.32
DCF Upside+35.6%+366.9%
Piotroski F7/95/9
Altman Z0.291.31
Beneish M
FCF Yield11.48%17.06%
Net Debt/EBITDA0.3x
ROIC5.1%
WACC7.4%7.7%
ROIC – WACC-2.6pp
Gross Margin
Net Margin29.6%22.8%
Rev Growth YoY4.3%14.0%
Sharpe (1Y)1.220.16
Max Drawdown 3Y-28.5%-22.4%
FCF Payout Ratio37%1%

MTB Price

Loading chart...

ACGL Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

MTB found in:

KRE1.44%
KBE0.98%
HDV0.51%
VOE0.49%
XLF0.44%
VFH0.40%
VO0.33%
RSP0.21%
VYM0.14%
VFVA0.14%
VTV0.13%
SCHV0.11%
SPYV0.11%
IWD0.10%
VONV0.10%
QUS0.07%
ONEO0.06%
ESGV0.06%
SCHX0.05%
IVV0.05%
SPY0.05%
VONE0.05%
VOO0.05%
VTI0.05%
SCHB0.05%
SPLG0.05%
ITOT0.05%
SPTM0.05%
URTH0.04%
ACWI0.03%
VFQY0.03%

ACGL found in:

KIE1.79%
ONEV0.96%
VOE0.57%
XLF0.47%
VFH0.41%
ONEO0.33%
VO0.32%
QUS0.21%
VFVA0.16%
VTV0.12%
SPYV0.12%
VONV0.10%
ESGV0.07%
SPLG0.05%
SPY0.05%
SPTM0.05%
VOO0.05%
VTI0.05%
VONE0.05%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

MTB vs ACGL: Head-to-Head Analysis

M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) and Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) represent two companies in the Financial Services sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, ACGL leads 6–3 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

The 252-day rolling correlation between MTB and ACGL is 0.277, indicating low correlation, making them an effective diversification pair in a portfolio context.

MTB appears in 31 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while ACGL appears in 19 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, MTB or ACGL?

Our quantitative analysis compares MTB and ACGL across nine fundamental dimensions. ACGL wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are MTB and ACGL correlated?

The 252-day correlation between MTB and ACGL is 0.277. They have low correlation, offering good diversification.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.